Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the divorced eutectoid transformation in the spheroidization of 52100 steel

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Austenite containing fine particles of carbides may undergo the eutectoid transformation by either the pearlite reaction or the divorced eutectoid transformation (DET) reaction. The latter reaction automatically produces a spheroidized structure, while the pearlite reaction produces a structure that resists spheroidization. This study has evaluated the heat treatment conditions that promote the DET in 52100 steel. The results show that the DET is dominant over the pearlite reaction for austenitization at temperatures of 830 °C and below and for cooling rates of 500 °C/h and below. This information should be useful in the design of more energy efficient heat treatment processes for spheroidization annealing than the very long time processes currently recommended in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metals Handbook, 8th ed., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1964, vol. 2, pp. 1–3.

  2. K.E. Thelning: Steel and Its Heat Treatment, Butterworth and Co., London, 1975, pp. 177–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Hewitt: Heat Treatment Met., 1982–83, pp. 56–62.

  4. L.E. Heron: Metallurgia, 1969, vol. 80 (478), pp. 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heat Treater’s Guide, 2nd ed, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1995, p. 429.

  6. K. Honda and S. Saito: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1920, vol. 102, pp. 261–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.H. Whiteley: J Iron Steel Inst. 1922, vol. 105, pp. 111–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Payson, W.L. Hodapp, and J. Leeder: Trans. ASM, 1940, vol. 28, pp. 306–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Oyama, O.D. Sherby, J. Wadsworth, and B. Walser: Scripta Metall., 1984, vol. 18, pp. 799–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J.D. Verhoeven and E.D. Gibson: Metall. Mater. Trans. 1998, vol. 29A, pp. 1181–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. E.L. Brown and G. Krauss: Metall. Trans., 1986, vol. 17A, pp. 31–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A.M. Cree, R.G. Faulkner, and A.T. Lyne: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1995, vol. 11, pp. 566–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C.A. Stickels: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 865–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.M. Beswick, Met. Trans. A, 1987, vol. 18A, pp. 1897–1906.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E.M. Taleff, C.K. Syn, D.R. Lesuer, and O.D. Sherby: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A, pp. 111–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhoeven, J.D. The role of the divorced eutectoid transformation in the spheroidization of 52100 steel. Metall Mater Trans A 31, 2431–2438 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-000-0188-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-000-0188-x

Keywords

Navigation