Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fragility fractures: proposal of the best practice through the fracture coordination units: the experience of Mexico

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fragility fractures represent a health problem in Mexico and in the world. This paper reviews and puts forward the implementation of Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) as a feasible and cost-effective alternative in health institutions in our country through the identification, treatment, and follow-up of this type of fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 1726–1733

  2. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7(5):407–413

  3. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11(8):669–674

  4. Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O'Connor MK, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13(12):1915–1923

  5. Curtis EM, van der Velde R, Moon RJ, van den Bergh JP, Geusens P, de Vries F, et al (2016) Epidemiology of fractures in the United Kingdom 1988–2012: variation with age, sex, geography, ethnicity and socioeconomic status Bone 87:19-26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations’ projections (UN); Consulted Nov18,2021:available from: .https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Oct/undesa_pd_2020_pf_government_policies_population_ageing.pdf

  7. Clark P, Lavielle P, Franco-Marina F, Ramirez E, Salmeron J, Kanis JA, et al (2005) Incidence rates and life-time risk of hip fractures in Mexicans over 50 years of age: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 16(12):2025–2030

  8. Johansson H, Clark P, Carlos F, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA (2011) Increasing age- and sex-specific rates of hip fracture in Mexico: a survey of the Mexican Institute of Social Security. Osteoporos Int 22(8):2359–2364

  9. Banefelt J, Akesson KE, Spangeus A, Ljunggren O, Karlsson L, Strom O, et al (2019) Risk of imminent fracture following a previous fracture in a Swedish database study. Osteoporos Int 30(3):601–609

  10. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Mineral Res 15(4):721–739

  11. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (1993) Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137(9):1001-1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seeman E (1995) The dilemma of osteoporosis in men. Am J Med 98(2A):76S-88S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ (2002) Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(10):1644-1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borgstrom F, Lekander I, Ivergard M, Strom O, Svedbom A, Alekna V, et al (2013) The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS)–quality of life during the first 4 months after fracture. Osteoporos Int 24(3):811–823

  15. Carlos F, Clark P, Galindo-Suarez RM, Chico-Barba LG (2013) Health care costs of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fragility fractures in Mexico. Arch Osteoporos 8:125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. IMSS (2019) Informe al Ejecutivo Federal y al Congreso de la Unión Sobre la Situación Financiera y los Riesgos del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 2018–2019. Consulted Nov 18,2021. Available from: http://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/pdf/informes/20182019/21-InformeCompleto.pdf

  17. María Gilma Arroyave Loaiza, Rocío Aburto Mejía, Dávila Torres JD. https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/profesionalesSalud/economia/Libro-GRD2017.pdf(2017) Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico Pg 502

  18. Aziziyeh R, Perlaza JG, Saleem N, Guiang H, Szafranski K, McTavish RK (2021) Benefits of fracture liaison services (FLS) in four Latin American countries: Brazil Mexico Colombia and Argentina J Med Econ 24(1):96-102 https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.1864920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McLellan AR (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with oste- oporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14(12):1028-1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. INEGI (2015) Intercensal survey 2015 of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) of Mexico. [cited 2021 June, 15]; Available from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/derechohabiencia/

  21. Gomez Dantes O, Sesma S, Becerril VM, Knaul FM, Arreola H, Frenk J (2011) The health system of Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 53(Suppl 2):s220–32. Epub 2011/09/09.

  22. José Alfredo Ochoa Moreno (2018) El financiamiento del sistema público de salud y la seguridad del paciente. Boletin CONAMED-OPS. Año 4, Num 19 Julio-Agosto

  23. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Mineral Res 7(2):221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kendler DL, Bauer DC, Davison KS, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST, et al (2016) Vertebral fractures: clinical importance and management. Am J Med 129(2):221-e1-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. (GCOA) GCoA (2019) The World’s leading business voice on aging. [cited 2019 8th June]; Available from: https://globalcoalitiononaging.com/

  26. Marsh D, Akesson K, Beaton DE, Bogoch ER, Boonen S, Brandi ML, et al (2011) Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2051–2065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD et al (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24(8):2135–2152

  28. Foundation IO (2019) Capture the fracture. [cited 2019 8th June]; Available from: https://www.capturethefracture.org/

  29. fundation Io. International fracture liaison service toolkit.; Consulted Nov 18, 2021. Available from: https://capturethefracture.org/sites/default/files/2014-IOF-CTF-FLS_toolkit.pdf

  30. Javaid MK, Sami A, Lems W, Mitchell P, Thomas T, Singer A et al (2020) A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos Int 31(7):1193–1204

  31. Bonanni S, Sorensen AA, Dubin J, Drees B (2017) The role of the fracture liaison service in osteoporosis care. Mo Med 114(4):295-298

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Geiger I, Kammerlander C, Höfer C, Volland R, Trinemeier J, Henschelchen M, et al (2021) Implementation of an integrated care programme to avoid fragility fractures of the hip in older adults in 18 Bavarian hospitals – study protocol for the cluster-randomised controlled fracture liaison service FLS-CARE. BMC Geriatr 21(1):43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Senay A, Delisle J, Banica A, Laflamme G (2018) Barriers to the identification of fragility fractures for secondary prevention in an orthopaedic clinic-based fracture liaison service: a prospective cohort study. Curr Orthop Pract 29(6):754-758

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baseline secondary fracture prevention in three Health Systems in Mexico: The FLS-Mx Inter-Institutional Group, https://www.asbmr.org/education/AbstractDetail?aid=a8d83ea0-7938-44fa-9e10-297e35078a18 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors want to thank the support from Mrs. María Josefina Bolado Garza, Head of the Translation Department, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, for translating this manuscript. MKJ was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Grupo FLS-MX: Grushenska Aguilar-Esparza, Patricia Clark, Roberto Coronado-Zarco, Muhammad Kassim Javaid, Fryda Medina-Rodríguez, Lucía Méndez-Sánchez, Andrea Olascoaga Gómez de León, Esperanza Ramírez-Pérez, Edgar Reyes-Padilla, Beatriz I. Sánchez-Trampe, Rubén Torres-González, Juan M. Viruega-Avalos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Clark.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

MKJ has received honoraria and grant support from Amgen, UCB and Kyowa Kirin Hakin outside of the development of this manuscript. The rest of the authors do not declare any conflict of interest in the development of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Méndez-Sánchez, L., Caló, M., Javaid, M.K. et al. Fragility fractures: proposal of the best practice through the fracture coordination units: the experience of Mexico. Arch Osteoporos 17, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-01044-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-01044-y

Keywords

Navigation