Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) has herein drafted clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis for the people of India. Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.

Purpose

In India, osteoporosis is a major public health problem. However, in the absence of any robust regional guidelines, the screening, treatment, and follow-up of patients with osteoporosis are lagging behind in the country.

Methods

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR), which is a multidisciplinary group of physicians, researchers, dietitians, and epidemiologists and who study bone and related tissues, in their annual meeting, drafted the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis that would be appropriate in a resource constraint setting like India.

Results

Diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in a patient with minimal trauma fracture without the aid of any other diagnostic tools. In others, bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry remains the modality of choice. Data indicates that osteoporotic fractures occur at an earlier age in Indians than in the West; hence, screening for osteoporosis should begin at an earlier age. FRAX can be used for fracture risk estimation; however, it may underestimate the risk of future fractures in our population and still needs validation. Maintaining optimum serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels is essential, which, in most cases, would require regular vitamin D supplementation. Pharmacotherapy should be guided by the presence/absence of vertebral/hip fractures or the severity of risk based on clinical factors, although bisphosphonates remain the first choice in most cases. Regular follow-up is essential to ensure adherence and response to therapy.

Conclusions

Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK et al (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roux C, Briot K (2020) The crisis of inadequate treatment in osteoporosis. Lancet Rheumatol 2:e110–e119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30136-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malhotra N, Mithal A (2008) Osteoporosis in Indians. Indian J Med Res 127:263–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khadilkar A, Mandlik R (2015) Epidemiology and treatment of osteoporosis in women: an Indian perspective. Int J Womens Health 841. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S54623

  6. Agrawal T, Verma AK Cross sectional study of osteoporosis among women. Med J Armed Forces India 69:168–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.07.024

  7. Babu A, Ikbal F, Noone M et al (2009) Osteoporosis and osteopenia in India: a few more observations. Indian J Med Sci 63:76. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.49242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kadam N, Chiplonkar S, Khadilkar A et al (2010) Low bone mass in urban Indian women above 40 years of age: prevalence and risk factors. Gynecol Endocrinol 26:909–917. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2010.487604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Garg MK et al (2011) Bone health in healthy Indian population aged 50 years and above. Osteoporos Int 22:2829–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1507-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma S, Tandon V, Mahajan A et al (2006) Preliminary screening of osteoporosis and osteopenia in urban women from Jammu using calcaneal QUS. Indian J Med Sci 60:183. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.25679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandhi AB, Shukla AK (2005) Evaluation of BMD of women above 40 years of age. J Obstet Gynecol India 55:265–267

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vaidya SV, Ekbote VH, Khadilkar AV et al (2012) Bone status of women over 40 years of age from two socioeconomic strata. Endocr Res 37:25–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/07435800.2011.601384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Unni J, Garg R, Pawar R (2010) Bone mineral density in women above 40 years. J Midlife Health 1:19. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.66989

  14. Shatrugna V, Kulkarni B, Kumar PA et al (2005) Bone status of Indian women from a low-income group and its relationship to the nutritional status. Osteoporos Int 16:1827–1835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1933-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Agrawal NK, Sharma B (2013) Prevalence of osteoporosis in otherwise healthy Indian males aged 50 years and above. Arch Osteoporos 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0116-x

  16. Shetty S, Kapoor N, Naik D et al (2014) Osteoporosis in healthy south Indian males and the influence of life style factors and vitamin D status on bone mineral density. J Osteoporos 2014:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/723238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nallasivan S (2019) Current treatment of osteoporosis. Indian J Rheumatol 14:57. https://doi.org/10.4103/injr.injr_74_18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mithal A, Bansal B, Kyer C, Ebeling P (2014) The Asia-Pacific regional audit-epidemiology, costs, and burden of osteoporosis in india 2013: a report of international osteoporosis foundation. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18:449. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.137485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Joshi A, Bhagwat N, Chadha M, Varthakavi P (2014) Osteoporosis treatment in India: call for action. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18:441. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.137482

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jhaveri S (2015) Current Clinical practice scenario of osteoporosis management in India. J Clin Diagn Res. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13000.6635

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh M, Harinarayan CV, Marwah R et al (2013) Clinical practice guidelines on postmenopausal osteoporosis: an executive summary and recommendations. J Midlife Health 4:107–126. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.115293

  22. Ahuja M (2016) Age of menopause and determinants of menopause age: a PAN India survey by IMS. J Midlife Health 7:126. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.191012

  23. Keramat A, Patwardhan B, Larijani B, et al (2008) The assessment of osteoporosis risk factors in Iranian women compared with Indian women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-28

  24. Alekel DL, Mortillaro E, Hussain EA et al (1999) Lifestyle and biologic contributors to proximal femur bone mineral density and hip axis length in two distinct ethnic groups of premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 9:327–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980050155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alekel DL, Peterson CT, Werner RK et al (2002) Frame size, ethnicity, lifestyle, and biologic contributors to areal and volumetric lumbar spine bone mineral density in Indian/Pakistani and American Caucasian premenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 5:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:5:2:175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaidya R, Shah R (2010) Bone mineral density and reference standards for Indian women. J Midlife Health 1:55. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.76211

  27. Ahmad I, Jafar T, Mahdi F et al (2018) Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism (TaqI and Apa1) with bone mineral density in North Indian postmenopausal women. Gene 659:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.03.052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitra S, Desai M, IkramKhatkhatay M (2006) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and bone mineral density in postmenopausal Indian women. Maturitas 55:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.01.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nutrient requirements and recommended dietary allowances for Indians: A Report of the Expert Group of the Indian Council of Medical Research; 2009. Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrition; Indian Council of Medical Research

  30. Harinarayan CV, Ramalakshmi T, Prasad UV et al (2007) High prevalence of low dietary calcium, high phytate consumption, and vitamin D deficiency in healthy south Indians. Am J Clin Nutr 85:1062–1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/85.4.1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Balk EM, Adam GP, Langberg VN et al (2017) Global dietary calcium intake among adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 28:3315–3324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4230-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Aparna P, Muthathal S, Nongkynrih B, Gupta S (2018) Vitamin D deficiency in India. J Fam Med Prim Care 7:324. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_78_18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Khadilkar A, Das G, Sayyad M et al (2007) Low calcium intake and hypovitaminosis D in adolescent girls. Arch Dis Child 92:1045–1045. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.116376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. G R, Gupta A, (2014) Vitamin D deficiency in India: prevalence, causalities and interventions. Nutrients 6:729–775. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6020729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal KS, Mughal MZ, Upadhyay P et al (2002) The impact of atmospheric pollution on vitamin D status of infants and toddlers in Delhi, India. Arch Dis Child 87:111–113. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.87.2.111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Gupta Y et al (2012) The prevalence of and risk factors for radiographic vertebral fractures in older Indian women and men: Delhi Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (DeVOS). Arch Osteoporos 7:201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0098-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar A, Mittal S, Orito S et al (2010) Impact of dietary intake, education, and physical activity on bone mineral density among North Indian women. J Bone Miner Metab 28:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-009-0118-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Raveendran A, Sen R, Dhaliwal L et al (2011) Prevalence and related risk factors of osteoporosis in peri- and postmenopausal Indian women. J Midlife Health 2:81. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.92537

  39. Pal R, Aggarwal A, Singh T et al (2020) Diagnostic cut-offs, prevalence, and biochemical predictors of sarcopenia in healthy Indian adults: the Sarcopenia-Chandigarh Urban Bone Epidemiological Study (Sarco-CUBES). Eur Geriatr Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00332-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jang H-D, Hong J-Y, Han K et al (2017) Relationship between bone mineral density and alcohol intake: a nationwide health survey analysis of postmenopausal women. PLoS ONE 12:e0180132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. van Staa TP, van Staa TP, van Staa TP et al (2002) The epidemiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 13:777–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980200108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vinayan K, Nisha B (2006) Epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs and bone health. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 9:90. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.25980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Paul T, Koshy G, Varghese R et al (2014) Derangements in bone mineral parameters and bone mineral density in south Indian subjects on antiepileptic medications. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 17:272. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.138489

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang L, Li M, Cao Y, et al (2017) Proton pump inhibitors and the risk for fracture at specific sites: data mining of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Sci Rep 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05552-1

  45. Siminoski K, Warshawski RS, Jen H, Lee K (2006) The accuracy of historical height loss for the detection of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17:290–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-2017-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenthal DI (1974) Tosteson AN (1989) Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis. Public Health Rep Wash DC 104(Suppl):31–33

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 288:1889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.15.1889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Binkley NC, Schmeer P, Wasnich RD, Lenchik L (2002) What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-caucasians? J Clin Densitom 5:s19–s27. https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shuhart CR, Yeap SS, Anderson PA et al (2019) Executive summary of the 2019 ISCD position development conference on monitoring treatment, DXA cross-calibration and least significant change, spinal cord injury, peri-prosthetic and orthopedic bone health, transgender medicine, and pediatrics. J Clin Densitom 22:453–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2019.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Aggarwal A, Pal R, Bhadada SK et al (2021) Bone mineral density in healthy adult Indian population: the Chandigarh Urban Bone Epidemiological Study (CUBES). Arch Osteoporos 16:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00868-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Makker A, Mishra G, Singh BP et al (2008) Normative bone mineral density data at multiple skeletal sites in Indian subjects. Arch Osteoporos 3:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-008-0019-z

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H et al (2008) A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone 42:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Binu AJ, Cherian KE, Kapoor N, et al (2018) Referral pattern for DXA scanning in a tertiary care centre from southern India. Arch Osteoporos 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0548-z

  54. Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Baim S (2008) National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008 Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis and the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): what they mean to the bone densitometrist and bone technologist. J Clin Densitom 11:473–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2008.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gupta A (1996) Osteoporosis in India–the nutritional hypothesis. Natl Med J India 9:268–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tannenbaum C, Clark J, Schwartzman K et al (2002) Yield of laboratory testing to identify secondary contributors to osteoporosis in otherwise healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4431–4437. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shetty S, Kapoor N, Bondu J et al (2016) Bone turnover markers: emerging tool in the management of osteoporosis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 20:846. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.192914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Bansal B, Mithal A, Chopra SR, et al (2018) Judicious use of DXA-BMD in assessing fracture risk by using clinical risk factors in the Indian population. Arch Osteoporos 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0536-3

  59. Eastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM et al (2019) Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an endocrine society* clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:1595–1622. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-00221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB et al (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. The Lancet 348:1535–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07088-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS et al (2007) Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med 357:1799–1809. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Odén A et al (2018) Characteristics of recurrent fractures. Osteoporos Int 29:1747–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4502-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey NC et al (2017) Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporos Int 28:775–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Roux C, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S et al (2007) Mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are risk factors for new fractures. Osteoporos Int 18:1617–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0413-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Huntjens KM, van Geel TA, van Helden S, et al (2013) The role of the combination of bone and fall related risk factors on short-term subsequent fracture risk and mortality. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-121

  66. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS et al (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25:2359–2381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR et al (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200105103441904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Daswani B, Desai M, Mitra S et al (2016) Influence of bone mineral density measurement on fracture risk assessment tool® scores in postmenopausal Indian women. Post Reprod Health 22:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053369116628722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Singh V, Pal AK, Biswas D, et al (2020) Identification of patients at high risk of fragility fractures in an Indian clinical setting using FRAX. Arch Osteoporos 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00807-3

  70. Leslie WD, Shevroja E, Johansson H et al (2018) Risk-equivalent T-score adjustment for using lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD registry. Osteoporos Int 29:751–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4405-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Harvey NC, Glüer CC, Binkley N et al (2015) Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice. Bone 78:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Garg A, Aggarwal A, Pal R, et al (2019) Trabecular bone score in healthy adult population of India: Chandigarh Urban Bone Epidemiological Study (CUBES). J Endocr Soc 3. https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2019-SAT-537

  73. Sooragonda B, Cherian KE, Jebasingh FK, et al (2019) Longitudinal changes in bone mineral density and trabecular bone score following yearly zoledronic acid infusion in postmenopausal osteoporosis—a retrospective-prospective study from southern India. Arch Osteoporos 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0630-1

  74. Kapoor N, Cherian K, Pramanik B et al (2017) Association between dental health and osteoporosis: a study in South Indian postmenopausal women. J Midlife Health 8:159. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_21_17

  75. Cherian KE, Kapoor N, Shetty S et al (2018) Evaluation of different screening tools for predicting femoral neck osteoporosis in rural south Indian postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 21:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2017.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Satyaraddi A, Shetty S, Kapoor N, et al (2017) Performance of risk assessment tools for predicting osteoporosis in south Indian rural elderly men. Arch Osteoporos 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0332-5

  77. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N et al (2016) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis — 2016– EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract 22:1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161435.ESGL

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Díez-Pérez A, Marin F, Eriksen EF et al (2019) Effects of teriparatide on hip and upper limb fractures in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone 120:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.09.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Lewiecki EM (2000) Osteoporosis: clinical evaluation. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al (eds) Endotext. MDText.com, Inc., South Dartmouth (MA)

  80. Roux C, Briot K (2017) Imminent fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 28:1765–1769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3976-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Leder BZ (2018) Optimizing sequential and combined anabolic and antiresorptive osteoporosis therapy: optimizing anabolic and antiresorptive therapy. JBMR Plus 2:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10041

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Anastasilakis AD, Papapoulos SE, Polyzos SA et al (2019) Zoledronate for the prevention of bone loss in women discontinuing denosumab treatment. a prospective 2-year clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 34:2220–2228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Kendler D, Chines A, Clark P et al (2020) Bone mineral density after transitioning from denosumab to alendronate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105:e255–e264. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lakhotia SM, Dongre P (2012) Treatment algorithm for Indian patients of osteoporosis. Ind Med Gaz 47:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  85. Tandon V, Gillani Z, Khajuria V et al (2014) First Indian prospective randomized comparative study evaluating adherence and compliance of postmenopausal osteoporotic patients for daily alendronate, weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate regimens of bisphosphonates. J Midlife Health 5:29. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.127788

  86. File E, Deal C (2009) Clinical update on teriparatide. Curr Rheumatol Rep 11:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-009-0023-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Minisola S, Cipriani C, Grotta GD, et al (2019) Update on the safety and efficacy of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 11:1759720X1987799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X19877994

  88. Bhadada SK, Sridhar S, Muthukrishnan J et al (2014) Predictors of atypical femoral fractures during long term bisphosphonate therapy: a case series & review of literature. Indian J Med Res 140:46–54

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Bonnick SL et al (2009) Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 24:1643–1646. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F et al (2002) Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 112:281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(01)01124-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Miller PD, Bilezikian JP, Deal C et al (2004) Clinical use of teriparatide in the real world: initial insights. Endocr Pract 10:139–148. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP.10.2.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Diez-Perez A, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D et al (2012) Treatment failure in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23:2769–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2093-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Miller PD (2007) Monitoring osteoporosis therapies. Curr Osteoporos Rep 5:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02938621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Pal R, Agrawal K, Gupta S et al (2020) Worsening of unrecognized tumour-induced osteomalacia with inadvertent use of recombinant human parathyroid hormone. Endokrynol Pol 71:102–103. https://doi.org/10.5603/EP.a2019.0045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Wu C-H, Chang Y-F, Chen C-H et al (2019) Consensus statement on the use of bone turnover markers for short-term monitoring of osteoporosis treatment in the Asia-Pacific Region. J Clin Densitom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2019.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Eastell R, Pigott T, Gossiel F et al (2018) Diagnosis of endocrine disease: bone turnover markers: are they clinically useful? Eur J Endocrinol 178:R19–R31. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Morris HA, Eastell R, Jorgensen NR et al (2017) Clinical usefulness of bone turnover marker concentrations in osteoporosis. Clin Chim Acta 467:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Krege JH, Lane NE, Harris JM, Miller PD (2014) PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25:2159–2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2646-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Ro C, Cooper O (2013) Bisphosphonate drug holiday: choosing appropriate candidates. Curr Osteoporos Rep 11:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-012-0129-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Sharma S, Tandon V, Mahajan A (2014) Bisphosphonate drug holidays: can we recommend currently? J Midlife Health 5:111. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.141186

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The initial version of the manuscript was drafted by Sanjay K. Bhadada, Manoj Chadha, Usha Sriram, Rimesh Pal, Thomas Paul, Nitin Kapoor, Ameya Joshi, Beena Bansal, Sushil Gupta, and Ambrish Mithal. The initial draft was edited and revised by Sanjay K. Bhadada, Ambrish Mithal, Satinath Mukhopadhay, Soham Mukherjee, Mahendra K. Garg, Narendra Kotwal, Nikhil Tandon, Rajesh Khadgawat, Subhash C. Kukreja, and Sudhaker D. Rao. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sanjay K. Bhadada or Ambrish Mithal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Being a position statement, ethical committee approval was not required.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhadada, S.K., Chadha, M., Sriram, U. et al. The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults. Arch Osteoporos 16, 102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00954-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00954-1

Keywords

Navigation