Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sunscreens block cutaneous vitamin D production with only a minimal effect on circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

A 50+ SPF sunscreen decreased significantly cutaneous vitamin D production following a single narrow-band (nb)UVB exposure, independently from the body surface area exposed. In contrast, the circulating 25(OH)D3 levels were only minimally affected. It is probable that another endogenous source of precursors is selected when skin-originated precursors are lacking.

Purpose

Sunscreen use, highly advocated for preventing cutaneous carcinogenesis, is potentially leading to an aggravation of vitamin D deficiency with its consequences on bone health. The effect of sunscreens on circulating vitamin D levels remains debated. This study investigated the effect of sunscreen on cutaneous vitamin D production and circulating 25(OH)D3 levels, according to different body surface areas (BSA).

Methods

Vitamin D and 25(OH)D3 levels were measured in four groups exposed to a single nbUVB exposure on 9% (group I: head and hands), 23% (group II: head, hands and arms), 50% (group III: head, hands, arms and legs) and 96% (group IV: total body) of the body surface without and with a 50+ sun protection factor sunscreen.

Results

Sunscreen use decreased by 83, 88.3, 75.7 and 92.5% the cutaneous vitamin D production in groups I to IV, respectively, but only by 13.2, 10.5, 7.7 and 10.4% the values of circulating 25(OH)D3, correspondingly.

Conclusions

Although a 50+ sunscreen decreases significantly cutaneous vitamin D production following a single nbUVB exposure, and independently from the BSA, the circulating 25(OH)D3 levels were only minimally affected. This could be explained by a switch to another endogenous source of precursors. Short-term sunscreen use probably does not affect circulating vitamin D levels and hence does not increase the risk for osteoporosis. The effect of long-term sunscreen use remains however to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cianferotti L, Cricelli C, Kanis JA, Nuti R, Reginster JY, Ringe JD, Rizzoli R, Brandi ML (2015) The clinical use of vitamin D metabolites and their potential developments: a position statement from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). Endocrine 50:12–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mistretta VI, Delanaye P, Chapelle JP, Souberbielle JC, Cavalier E (2008) Vitamin D2 or vitamin D3? Rev Med Interne 29:815–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Libon F, Cavalier E, Nikkels AF (2013) Skin color is relevant to vitamin D synthesis. Dermatology 227:250–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marwaha RK, Yenamandra VK, Sreenivas V, Sahay R, Baruah MP, Desai A, Kurvilla S, Joseph S, Unnikrishnan AG, Lakshmy R, Apoorva C, Sharma VK, Sethuraman G (2016) Regional and seasonal variations in ultraviolet B irradiation and vitamin D synthesis in India. Osteoporos Int 27:1611–1617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Libon F, Courtois J, Le GC, Lukas P, Fabregat-Cabello N, Seidel L, Cavalier E, Nikkels AF (2017) Effect of body site and surface on vitamin D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D production after a single narrowband UVB-exposure. J Invest Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.01.032

  6. Sánchez G, Nova J, Rodriguez-Hernandez AE, Medina RD, Solorzano-Restrepo C, Gonzalez J, Olmos M, Godfrey K, Arevalo-Rodriguez I (2016) Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD011161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Autier P, Boniol M, Severi G, Doré JF (2001) Quantity of sunscreen used by European students. European organization for research and treatment of cancer melanoma co-operative group. Br J Dermatol 144:288–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gozali MV, Zhou BR, Luo D (2016) Update on treatment of photodermatosis. Dermatol Online J 22

  9. Heine G, Lahl A, Müller C, Worm M (2010) Vitamin D deficiency in patients withcutaneous lupus erythematosus is prevalent throughout the year. Br J Dermatol 163:863–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuoka LY, Ide L, Wortsman J, Holick MF (1987) Sunscreens suppress cutaneous vitamin D3 synthesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:1165–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuoka LY, Wortsman J, Hanifan N, Holick MF (1988) Chronic sunscreen use decreases circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. A preliminary study. Arch Dermatol 124:1802–1804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuoka LY, Wortsman J, Hollis BW (1990) Use of topical sunscreen for the evaluation of regional synthesis of vitamin D3. J Am Acad Dermatol 22:772–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cusack C, Danby C, Fallon JC (2008) Photoprotectivebehaviour and sunscreen use: impact on vitamin D levels in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 24:260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faurschou A, Beyer DM, Schmedes A, Bogh MK, Philipsen PA, Wulf HC (2012) The relation between sunscreen layer thickness and vitamin D production after ultraviolet B exposure: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 167:391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kligman EW, Watkins A, Johnson K, Kronland R (1989) The impact of lifestyle factors on serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in older adults: a preliminary study. Fam Pract Res 9:11–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marks R, Foley PA, Jolley D, Knight KR, Harrison J, Thompson SC (1995) The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dermatol 131:415–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sollitto RB, Kraemer KH, DiGiovanna JJ (1989) Normal vitamin D levels can be maintained despite rigorous photoprotection: six years’ experience with xerodermapigmentosum. J Am Acad Dermatol 37:942–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thieden E, Philipsen PA, Sandby-Møller J, Wulf HC (2005) Sunscreen use related to UV exposure, age, sex, and occupation based on personal dosimeter readings and sun-exposure behavior diaries. Arch Dermatol 141:967–973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris SS, Dawson-Hughes B (2007) Reduced sun exposure does not explain the inverse association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D with percent body fat in older adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:3155–3157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kimlin M, Harrison S, Nowak M, Moore M, Brodie A, Lang C (2007) Does a high UV environment ensure adequate vitamin D status? J Photochem Photobiol B 89:139–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Mutairi N, Issa BI, Nair V (2012) Photoprotection and vitamin D status: a study on awareness, knowledge and attitude towards sun protection in general population from Kuwait, and its relation with vitamin D levels. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 78:342–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Linos E, Keiser E, Kanzler M, Sainani KL, Lee W, Vittinghoff E, Chren MM, Tang JY (2006) Sun protective behaviors and vitamin D levels in the US population: NHANES 2003-2006. Cancer Causes Control 23:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stiefel C, Schwack W (2015) Photoprotection in changing times—UV filter efficacy and safety, sensitization processes and regulatory aspects. Int J Cosmet Sci 37:2–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310:2191–2194

  25. Hettiaratchy S, Papini R (2004) ABC of burns: initial management of a major burn: II—assessment and resuscitation. BMJ 329:101–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Grigalavicius M, Iani V, Juzeniene A (2016) Layer thickness of SPF 30 sunscreen and formation of pre-vitamin D. Anticancer Res 36:1409–1415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sayre RM, Dowdy JC (2007) Darkness at noon: sunscreens and vitamin D3. Photochem Photobiol 83:459–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Farrerons J, Barnadas M, López-Navidad A, Renau A, Rodríguez J, Yoldi B, Alomar A (2001) Sunscreen and risk of osteoporosis in the elderly: a two-year follow-up. Dermatology 202:27–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MacLaughlin JA, Anderson RR, Holick MF (1982) Spectral character of sunlight modulates photosynthesis of previtamin D3 and its photoisomers in human skin. Science 216:1001–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kockott D, Herzog B, Reichrath J, Keane K, Holick MF (2016) New approach to develop optimized sunscreens that enable cutaneous vitamin D formation with minimal erythema risk. PLoS One 11:e0145509

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Holick MF (2009) Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation, and clinical application. Ann Epidemiol 19:73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carrelli A, Bucovsky M, Horst R, Cremers S, Zhang C, Bessler M, Schrope B, Evanko J, Blanco J, Silverberg SJ, Stein EM (2017) Vitamin D storage in adipose tissue of obese and normal weight women. J Bone Miner Res 32:237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ethgen O, Hiligsmann M, Burlet N, Reginster JY (2015) Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dairy products supplemented with vitamin D in prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Arch Public Health 73:48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ethgen O, Hiligsmann M, Burlet N, Reginster JY (2016) Cost-effectiveness of personalized supplementation with vitamin D-rich dairy products in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 27:301–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hiligsmann M, Burlet N, Fardellone P, Al-Daghri N, Reginster JY (2017) Public health impact and economic evaluation of vitamin D-fortified dairy products for fracture prevention in France. Osteoporos Int 28:833–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Norval M, Björn LO, de Gruijl FR (2010) Is the action spectrum for the UV-induced production of previtamin D3 in human skin correct? Photochem Photobiol Sci 9:11–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357:266–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No specific acknowledgments to be declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjen F. Nikkels.

Ethics declarations

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) [24] and approved by the university hospital ethics committee. All study procedures were explained to the volunteers. All participants signed an informed consent form.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Libon, F., Courtois, J., Le Goff, C. et al. Sunscreens block cutaneous vitamin D production with only a minimal effect on circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Arch Osteoporos 12, 66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0361-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0361-0

Keywords

Navigation