The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s methods and processes for developing position statements

Abstract

Summary

The methods and processes described in this manuscript have been approved and adopted by the NOF Board of Trustees on November 11, 2015. This manuscript has been peer-reviewed by the NOF Research Committee and Osteoporosis International.

The National Osteoporosis Foundation frequently publishes position statements for the benefit of educating healthcare professionals and the general public on a particular issue and/or concern related to preventing osteoporosis and/or promoting strong bones throughout the lifespan. This manuscript represents the official methods and processes adopted by the NOF Board of Trustees for the purpose developing future position statements in a transparent and unbiased manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Abbreviations

AHRQ:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

NOF:

National Osteoporosis Foundation

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

References

  1. 1.

    Institute of Medicine (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (2008) U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF. July 2008. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/methods-and-processes

  3. 3.

    Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (2015) Standards for Commercial Support: Standards to Ensure Independence in CME Activities. Available from: http://www.accme.org/requirements/accreditation-requirements-cme-providers/standards-for-commercial-support

  4. 4.

    Coughlin SS, Soskolne CL, Goodman KW (1997) Case studies in public health ethics. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    American Diabetes Association (2012) Clinical practice recommendation. Diabetes Care 35(suppl 1):S1–2

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Woolf SH (2006) Weighing the evidence to formulate dietary guidelines. J Am Coll Nutr 25(suppl):277S–84S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taylor C. Wallace.

Ethics declarations

Sources of financial support

None

Conflicts of interest

TCW is employed by the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Bauer DC, Gagel RF, Greenspan SL, Lappe JM, LeBoff MS, Recker RR, Saag KG, and Singer AJ are members of the National Osteoporosis Foundation Board of Trustees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wallace, T.C., Bauer, D.C., Gagel, R.F. et al. The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s methods and processes for developing position statements. Arch Osteoporos 11, 22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-016-0276-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Position statement
  • Process
  • National Osteoporosis Foundation