Phalangeal bone mineral density predicts incident fractures: a prospective cohort study on men and women—results from the Danish Health Examination Survey 2007–2008 (DANHES 2007–2008)
- 183 Downloads
This prospective study investigates the use of phalangeal bone mineral density (BMD) in predicting fractures in a cohort (15,542) who underwent a BMD scan. In both women and men, a decrease in BMD was associated with an increased risk of fracture when adjusted for age and prevalent fractures.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of a compact and portable scanner using radiographic absorptiometry (RA) to predict major osteoporotic fractures.
This prospective study included a cohort of 15,542 men and women aged 18–95 years, who underwent a BMD scan in Danish Health Examination Survey 2007–2008. BMD at the middle phalanges of the second, third and fourth digits of the non-dominant hand was measured using RA (Alara MetriScan®). These data were merged with information on incident fractures retrieved from the Danish National Patient Registry comprising the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Follow-up was 27–45 months. Major osteoporotic fractures (vertebral fractures, humerus fractures, forearm fractures and hip fractures) were used in the analyses. Fracture events were calculated as “persons with fracture” and evaluated using survival analysis.
A total of 307 (1.98 %) of the participants had experienced a new fracture during follow-up. BMD was significantly lower in subjects with fracture (0.32 vs. 0.34 g/cm2; p < 0.001 adjusted for age, gender, prevalent fractures, height, weight and smoking). In both women and men, a 1 SD decrease in BMD (T score units) was associated with an increased risk of fracture when adjusted for age and prevalent fractures (women: HR = 1.39, CI 1.24–1.54, p < 0.001; men: HR = 1.47, CI 1.20–1.79, p < 0.001).
Phalangeal BMD as measured using RA predicts the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures.
KeywordsFracture Fracture prediction Follow-up studies Bone mineral density Phalangeal bone Osteoporosis
- 3.Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De LC, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ III, O’Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.World Health Organisation (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. WHO Sientific Group, World Health Organisation, BrusselGoogle Scholar
- 6.Rejnmark L, Abrahamsen B, Ejersted C, Hyldstrup L, Jensen J, Madsen OR, Mosekilde L, Schwarz P, Vestergaard P, Langdahl B (2009) Vejledning til udredning og behandling af osteoporose [Guidance for diagnosing and treatment of osteoporosis]. Dansk Knoglemedicinsk Selskab [Danish Bonemedical Society], DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Curtis JR, Laster A, Becker DJ, Carbone L, Gary LC, Kilgore ML, Matthews RS, Morrisey MA, Saag KG, Tanner SB, Delzell E (2009) The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States. Osteoporos Int 20:1553–1561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM, Felsenberg D, Roux C, Barkmann R, Timm W, Blenk T, Armbrecht G, Stewart A, Clowes J, Thomasius FE, Kolta S (2004) Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS study. J Bone Miner Res 19:782–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Chen YT, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ekman A, Michaelsson K, Petren-Mallmin M, Ljunghall S, Mallmin H (2002) Dual X-ray absorptiometry of hip, heel ultrasound, and densitometry of fingers can discriminate male patients with hip fracture from control subjects: a comparison of four different methods. J Clin Densitom 5:79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.World Health Organisation (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Report of the WHO study group, 843rd edn, WHO technical report series. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 30.Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (2005) The Cox proportional hazards model and its characteristics. In: Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (eds) Survival analysis. A self-learning text, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 97–160Google Scholar
- 38.Christensen AI, Severin M, Eriksen L, Toftager M, Zachariassen A, Ekholm O, Tolstrup JS, Grønbæk M, Curtis T (2009) KRAM-undersøgelsen i tal og billeder [The KRAM-study in numbers and pictures]. The Danish Ministry of Health and Prevention and the. TrygFoundation, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- 39.Statistic Denmark (2009) StatBank Denmark http://www.statbank.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1280 Accessed 5 Jun 2012
- 40.Ekholm O, Kjøller M, Davidsen M, Hesse U, Eriksen L, Christensen AI, Grønbæk M (2006) Sundhed og Sygelighed i Danmark 2005 og udviklingen siden 1987 [Health and morbidity in Denmark 2005]. National Institute of Public Health, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar