Abstract
Research on the molecular mechanisms controlling circadian rhythm in Western medicine is comparable to the study of a day-night rhythm in Chinese medicine (CM), as also focus on the same life phenomenon. By comparing the two, this paper elaborates on the differences between them in their respective issues of consciousness, ways of thinking, research methods and research results. Relatively speaking, Nobel Prize research has a stronger sense of the problems and concerns about the essence of “what”, while CM focuses on “how a thing functions”. The former mainly adopts experimental and mathematical methods, while the latter primarily depends on observation and understanding. The natural philosophy and natural science eventually lead to the results and the inevitable, quantitative and qualitative differences. Research on the life rhythm in CM should be proposed, scientific problems should be fully grasped, and research should be carried out with the aid of multidisciplinary new knowledge and new achievements through cross-disciplinary studies. On the basis of clinical epidemiological research and experimental research, a systematic review should be made of the human physiology of CM and the pathological rhythm model to explore the regulatory mechanism of time rhythm and create a new theory of time medicine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Takahashi JS. Molecular architecture of the circadian clock in mammals. A time for metabolism and hormones. Springer International Publishing;2016:6–11.
Kivimäe S, Saez L, Young MW. Activating PER repressor through a DBT-directed phosphorylation switch. Plos Biol 2008;6(7):e183.
Xing YR, ed. The theory and methodology of Huangdi Neijing. 2. Xi’an: Shaanxi Science and Technology Press;2006:341–353.
Ding L, Wang P, You QY, Long QH. Application of circadian rhythm in clinical practice of traditional Chinese medicine. China J Tradit Chin Med Pharm (Chin) 2017;32:95–97.
Pivot. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House;1981:39.
Pivot. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House;1981:90.
Chen GY. Laozi’s commentary and review. Beijing: China Publishing House;2015:151.
Wang FZ. Chuanshan Quanshu. Book 1. Changsha: Yuelu Publishing. House;1988:1112.
Yellow Emperor’s Canon of Medicine•Su Wen. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House;1983:456.
Zhang ZL, ed. Research on Chinese ancient body path. Beijing: Life, Reading, New Knowledge, Sanlian Bookstore;2015:128–137.
Yellow Emperor’s Canon of Medicine•Su Wen. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House;1983:361.
Liu CL, ed. Chinese systematic thinking—cultural gene access. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press;2009:267.
Chen JJ, Zhang CM. Chinese astronomical discovery. Jinan: Shandong Pictorial Publishing House;2008:24–53.
Chen JJ. New theory on the origin of yin yang and five elements and eight diagrams. Nat Hist Res (Chin) 1986;5:97–112.
Dong ZS, ed. Luxuriant gems of the spring and autumn annals. Changsha: Yuelu Publishing House;1997:224.
Yellow Emperor’s Canon of Medicine•Su Wen. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House;1983:158.
Yellow Emperor’s Canon of Medicine•Su Wen. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House;1983:141.
Popper K, Ji SL. Conjecture and rebuttal: the growth of scientific knowledge: conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House;2015:320.
Hilbert D. Mathematical problems. In: Li WL, Yuan XD, Translated. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press;2009:38.
Zhuo LS. Observation of meridian length and camp airflow from ancient numbers. Chin Acupunct Moxibust (Chin) 2008;28:591–595.
Glass L, McGee MC. From the pendulum clock to Chaos—the rhythm of life. In: Pan T, Zeng YZ, Pan Y, Translated. Shanghai: Shanghai Far East Press;1994:179–186.
Bernard C. Introduction to experimental medical research. In: Xia NR, Guang QD, Translated. Beijing: Commercial Press;1991:8, 44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Key Basic Research Development Plan (“973” Plan) Funded Projects (No. 2013CB532002)
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Author Contributions
Under the guidance of Xing YR, Meng X and Qu KS completed the writing of this paper, and Huang Y provided supplementary information and improvements.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xing, M., Qu, Ks., Huang, Y. et al. A Reflection on the 2017 Nobel Prize for Physiology and Chinese Medicine. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 26, 867–872 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-018-2945-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-018-2945-3