Skip to main content
Log in

Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To clarify the effectiveness of Chinese herbal fomentation in treating chronic neck pain by means of changes in cervical kinematics.

Methods

Seventy-six patients with chronic neck pain were included in the study and were randomized into two groups based on the random number generator of the SPSS software: fomentation combined with Chinese herbal (Group 1) and fomentation without any medicine (Group 2). In both groups, the fomentation lasted for 60 min and heated to 35 °C, once a day for 28 consecutive days. Standard lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained including the neutral, full flexion, and full extension positions. Before and after intervention, the following parameters were used to evaluate the changes in kinematics: range of motion (ROM), sagittal alignment and instantaneous center of rotation (ICR).

Results

After treatment, the ROM was signifcantly higher than that of before treatment in Group 1 (51.5, 95% CI: 49.8–55.9; P<0.05). There was no significant difference between before and after treatment in Group 2 (P>0.05). Although C2-C7 cervical alignment was increased in both groups after treatment, no significant difference was detected between before and after treatment (P>0.05). For Group 1, the significant X coordinate variation was only observed at C5/C6 level (38.1; 95% CI: 34.0, 42.1; P<0.05). There was a significant upward trend in the Y coordinate of the ICR at C5/C6 (−30.5; 95% CI: −34.3, −26.8; P<0.05) and C6/C7 after treatment (−6.1; 95% CI: −6.7, −5.4; P<0.05). For Group 2, the ICR location of each level was not statistically different between the pre- and post-treatment (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Chinese herbal fomentation could improve abnormal mobility in terms of ROM and ICR. Chinese herbal fomentation might be an effective treatment for chronic neck pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Kristman V. The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the general population: a population-based cohort study. Pain 2004;112:267–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2005;15:834–848.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Abnormal instantaneous axes of rotation in patients with neck pain. Spine 1992;17:748–756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogt L, Segieth C, Banzer W, Himmelreich H. Movement behaviour in patients with chronic neck pain. Physiother Res Int 2007;12:206–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu WB, Liang ZH, Zhu XP, Yu P, Zhang JF. Analysis on the effect of acupuncture in treating cervical spondylosis with different syndrome types. Chin J Integr Med 2009;15:426–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moon TW, Choi TY, Park TY, Lee MS. Chuna therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials in Korean literature. Chin J Integr Med 2013;19:228–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang SW, Mi ZX, Li SH, Zhang DH, Deng Q. Evaluate the clinical outcome of modified open door laminoplasty using anchor method combined with Chinese herbs pyrogenic dressing therapy. Cina J Orthopaed Traumatol (Chin) 2008;21:934–935.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cui J, Liu X, Wei HE, Zhang XQ, Li XH. The impact of electroacupuncture with traditional Chinese medicine fomentation to hypertrophic cervical spondylosis in clinic and electromyogram. J Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2008;20(4):58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 2000;25:2072–2078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 2000;15:633–648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. White A, Panjabi M, eds. Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1990:88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: I. An empirical study of technical errors. Clin Biomechanics 1991;6:31–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, Mazel C, Guise JD, Skalli W. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 2006;6:982–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodhouse A, Vasseljen O. Altered motor control patterns in whiplash and chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagen KB, Harms-Ringdahl K, Enger NO, Hedenstad R, Morten H. Relationship between subjective neck disorders and cervical spine mobility and motion related pain in male machine operators. Spine 1997;22:1501–1507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Loose V, van den Oord M, Burnotte F, van Tiggelen D, Stevens V, Cagnie B, et al. Functional assessment of the cervical spine in F-16 pilots with and without neck pain. Aviation Space Environm Med 2009;80:477–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider G, Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N. Abnormal motion in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2005;30:1159–1164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grip H, Sundelin G, Gerdle B, Stefan Karlsson J. Cervical helical axis characteristics and its center of rotation during active head and upper arm movements-comparisons of whiplash-associated disorders, non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals. J Biomech 2008;41:2799–2805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bogduk N, Marsland A. The cervical zygapophysial joints as a source of neck pain. Spine 1988;13:610–617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falla D. Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Man Ther 2004;9:125–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Falla D, Jull G, Hodges PW. Feedforward activity of the cervical flexor muscles during voluntary arm movements is delayed in chronic neck pain. Exp Brain Res 2004;157:43–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ylinen J, Takala EP, Kautiainen H, Nykänen M, Häkkinen A, Pohjolainen T, et al. Association of neck pain, disability and neck pain during maximal effort with neck muscle strength and range of movement in women with chronic non-specific neck pain. Eur J Pain 2004;8:473–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolff MW, Levine LA. Cervical radiculopathies: conservative approaches to management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2002;13:589–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Kessler R, Phillips, RS. Patterns and perceptions of care for treatment of back and neck pain: results of a national survey. Spine 2003;28:292–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Lin  (林 欣).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Zy., Liu, Bg. & Lin, X. Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 20, 917–922 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4

Keywords

Navigation