Skip to main content

Clinical research on acupuncture — Concepts and guidance on efficacy and effectiveness research

Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine volume 17, pages 166–172 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Over the last few years a number of large acupuncture trials have been carried out in western countries. carried out in western countries. The following article draws on the experience from these recent large-scale trials on acupuncture to outline the way randomized trials could be used to answer questions on efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency. could be used to answer questions on efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency. It will provide guidance, firstly on the underlying concepts of both efficacy and effectiveness and secondly on designing both types of trials. and secondly on designing both types of trials. In addition, the controversy over specific and non-specific effects of acupuncture, emerging from the results of the above-mentioned trials, will be highlighted. above-mentioned trials, will be highlighted. Suggestions for future clinical research on acupuncture include: greater reflection on the complex approach of Chinese medicine, and transparent and detailed reporting according to CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines. guidelines. The current data on acupuncture point-specific effects do indeed have relevance, however for valid decision-making on acupuncture, further clinical trials on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are required to provide realistic benefit estimates for future health care. provide realistic benefit estimates for future health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van-Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280:1569–1575.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Härtel U, Volger E. Use and acceptance of classical natural remedies and alternative medicines in Germany-Results of a represenntative population study. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2004;11:327–334.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, Van Rompay MI, Walters EE, Wilkey SA, et al. Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:262–268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Witt CM, Brinkhaus B, Jena S, Selim D, Straub J, Willich SN. Efficacy, safety and cost of acupuncture-a model project with the health insurance technician. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2006;103:196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Witt CM. Efficacy, effectiveness, pragmatic trials — guidance on terminology and the advantages of pragmatic trials. Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2009;16:292–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Last J, Spasoff, RA, Harris S. A dictionary of epidemiology. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness research—implications of the federal coordinating council’s report. N Engl J Med 2009;361:330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis 1967;20:637–648.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624–1632.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008;337: a2390.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ 2009;180:E47–E57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Liecker B, Wegscheider K, Willich SN. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and the hip. Arthritis Rheumatism 2006;54:3485–3493.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Witt CM, Jena S, Selim D, Brinkhaus B, Reinhold T, Wruck K, et al. Pragmatic randomized trial of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:487–496.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Liecker B, Wegscheider K, Willich SN. Acupuncture for patients with chronic neck pain. Pain 2006;125:98–106.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jena S, Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Wegscheider K, Willich S. Acupuncture in patients with headache. Cephalalgia 2008;28:969–979.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Willich SN, Reinhold T, Selim D, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Witt CM. Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic neck pain. Pain 2006;125:107–113.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Witt CM, Reinhold T, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Willich SN. Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in patients with headache. Cephalalgia 2008;28:334–345.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reinhold T, Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Willich SN. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in patients with osteoarthritis pain. Eur J Health Econ 2008;9:209–219.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Jena S, Linde K, Streng A, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005;366:136–143.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brinkhaus B, Witt CM, Jena S, Linde K, Streng A, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain — a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:450–457.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Linde K, Streng A, Jürgens S, Hoppe A, Brinkhaus B, Witt C, et al. Acupuncture for patients with migraine — a randomized trial (ART Migraine). JAMA 2005;293:2118–2125.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Melchart D, Streng A, Hoppe A, Brinkhaus B, Witt C, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with tension-type Headache — a randomised trial. BMJ 2005;331:376–382.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaptchuk TJ, Chen KJ, Song J. Recent clinical trials of acupuncture in the West: responses from the practitioners. Chin J Integr Med 2010;16:197–203.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Avins AL, Erro JH, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, et al. A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:858–866.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Manheimer E, Linde K, Lao L, Bouter LM, Berman BM. Meta-analysis: acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:868–877.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Manheimer E, Vickers A, White AR. Acupuncture for tension-type headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD007587.

  27. Linde K, Niemann K, Schneider A, Meissner K. How large are the nonspecific effects of acupuncture? A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med 2010;8:75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Linde K, Niemann K, Meissner K. Are sham acupuncture interventions more effective than (other) placebos? A reanalysis of data from the Cochrane review on placebo effects. Forsch Komplement Med 2010;17:259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wu GC. Acupuncture analgesia in migraine. Chin J Integr Med 2009;15:248–250.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. http://www.consort-statement.org. 2010.

  31. MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Youping L, Taixiang W, White A, et al. Revised STandards for reporting Interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000261.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fonnebo V, Grimsgaard S, Walach H, Ritenbaugh C, Norheim AJ, MacPherson H, et al. Researching complementary and alternative treatments — the gatekeepers are not at home. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Opinion of the Scientific Committee of the Federal Medical Council “Placebo in Medicine”. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2010;107:A1417–A1421.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Berman BM, Langevin HM, Witt CM, Dubner R. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med 2010;363:454–461.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, 10098, Berlin, Germany

    Claudia M. Witt

Authors
  1. Claudia M. Witt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia M. Witt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witt, C.M. Clinical research on acupuncture — Concepts and guidance on efficacy and effectiveness research. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 17, 166–172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-011-0662-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-011-0662-x

Keywords

  • acupuncture
  • efficacy
  • effectiveness
  • randomized controlled trial
  • randomized pragmatic trial