Advertisement

Evoluzione della chirurgia sostitutiva di ginocchio

  • Giuliano CerulliEmail author
Aggiornamenti
  • 13 Downloads

The evolution of knee-replacement

Abstract

The advent of knee arthroplasty is one of the most significant advances in surgery. Engineering and biomechanical innovations have shown a fast and effective evolution, in order to satisfy increasing functional requirements. In this paper, the most important steps of this fascinating story are presented. It is clear that biomechanical and tribological studies have always represented the basis for the onset of minimally invasive surgery, with less complications and greater patient satisfaction. This evolution concerns not only the design of components, but also the materials used.

Notes

Ringraziamenti

Si ringrazia il Dr. Francesco Manfreda per la sua preziosa collaborazione nella stesura e revisione del manoscritto.

Conflitto di interesse

L’autore Giuliano Cerulli dichiara di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Causero A, Di Benedetto P, Beltrame A et al. (2014) Design evolution in total knee replacement: which is the future? Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis 85(2):5–19 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deroche P (2008) History, evolution of concepts, various current prostheses. In: Bonnin M, Chambat P (eds) Osteoarthritis of the knee. Springer, Paris, pp 159–181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunston FH (1971) Polycentric knee arthroplasty: prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53(2):272–277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman MA, Sculco T, Todd RC (1977) Replacement of the severely damaged arthritic knee by the ICLH (Freeman-Swanson) arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59(1):64–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freeman MA, Railton GT (1988) Should the posterior cruciate ligament be retained or resected in condylar nonmeniscal knee arthroplasty? The case for resection. J Arthroplast 3:S3–S12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 61(2):173–180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Insall J, Tria AJ, Scott WN (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first 5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 145:68–77 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Comitini S, Tigani D, Leonetti D (2014) Evolution in knee replacement implant. Single Cell Biol 4:109 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Felice R, Giron F (1999) The Insall-Burstein total knee replacement in osteoarthritis: a 10-year-minimum follow-up. J Arthroplast 14(5):560–565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amendola L, Tigani D, Fosco M, Dallari D (2012) History of condylar total knee arthroplasty. In: Fokter SK (ed) Recent advances in hip and knee arthroplasty. InTech, Rijeka Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Indelli PF, Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Baldini A (2002) The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis: a 5-to 9-year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplast 17(5):544–549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walker PS (2001) A new concept in guided motion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16(8):157–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Nicola U, Pace N (2005) La protesi di ginocchio di primo impianto. Springer, Milan CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Townley CO (1985) The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:82–96 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1986) The New Jersey Low-Contact-Stress Knee Replacement System: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Traumatol Surg 105(4):197–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hungerford DS, Kenna RV (1983) Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176:95–107 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Kenna RV (1984) Total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive approach. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Song EK, Seon JK, Moon JY, Ji-Hyoun Y (2013) The evolution of modern total knee prostheses. In: Arthroplasty – Update InTec, London.  https://doi.org/10.5772/54343 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983–989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB et al. (1998) Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weightbearing conditions. J Arthroplast 13:748–752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J et al. (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antinolfi P, Manfreda F, Placella G et al. (2018) The challenge of managing the “third-space” in total knee arthroplasty: review of current concepts. Joints 6(3):204–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    White SE, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS et al. (1994) Simulated knee wear with cobalt chromium and oxidized zirconium knee femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:176–184 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muratoglu OK, Mark A, Vittetoe DA et al. (2003) Polyethylene damage in total knees and use of highly crosslinked polyethylene. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 85(85A(Suppl 1)):S7–S13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown TS, Van Citters DW, Berry DJ, Abdel MP (2017) The use of highly crosslinked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 99(8):996–1002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spector BM, Ries MD, Bourne RB et al. (2001) Wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on oxidized zirconium total knee femoral components. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 83(83A(Suppl 2 Pt):80–86. 2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koshino T, Okamoto R, Takagi T et al. (2002) Cemented ceramic YMCK total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplast 17:1009–1015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dalla Pria P (2007) Evolution and new application of the alumina ceramics in joint replacement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:253–256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laskin RS (2003) An oxidized Zr ceramic surfaced femoral component for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:191–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto di Ricerca Traslazionale per l’Apparato LocomotorePerugiaItalia

Personalised recommendations