Advertisement

Protesi di rivestimento di anca

  • Filippo Calanna
  • Luca GalaEmail author
Aggiornamenti
  • 5 Downloads

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Abstract

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a concept of hip replacement surgery developed specifically for young and active patients. Femoral bone stock preservation and restoring of normal anatomy of the hip joint allow for better functioning, with increased frequency and duration of sporting activities. Patient-related factors leading to worse outcomes have also been identified. Moreover, concerns about metal-on-metal bearings with adverse reaction to metal debris have led to a recent drop-off in this kind of procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current trends about hip resurfacing and comparing it to standard hip replacement arthroplasty. Hip resurfacing still represents a viable option with a correct indication, in the right hands and using a device with a long track record.

Notes

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori Luca Gala e Filippo Calanna dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e animali da parte degli autori.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2006) Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220(2):85–94 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amstutz HC, Dorey F, O’Carroll PF (1986) THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty. Evolution and long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 213:92–114 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL (1990) Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 72(5):708–714 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz HC (1994) The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 76(5):677–688 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kabo JM, Gebhard JS, Loren G, Amstutz HC (1993) In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 75(2):254–258 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al. (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 91(8):1019–1024 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J et al. (2012) Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 94(6):746–754 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehra A, Berryman F, Matharu GS et al. (2015) Birmingham hip resurfacing: a single surgeon series reported at a minimum of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplast 30(7):1160–1166 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bedigrew KM, Ruh EL, Zhang Q et al. (2012) 2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):299–306 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gross TP, Liu F (2014) Current status of modern fully porous coated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29(1):181–185 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ribas M, Cardenas C, Astarita E et al. (2014) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: mid-term results in 486 cases and current indication in our institution. Hip Int 24(Suppl 10):S19–24 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robinson PG, Wilkinson AJ, Meek RM (2014) Metal ion levels and revision rates in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study. Hip Int 24(2):123–128 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson AJ, Le Duff MJ, Yoon JP et al. (2013) Metal ion levels in total hip arthroplasty versus hip resurfacing. J Arthroplast 28(7):1235–1237 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haughom BD, Erickson BJ, Hellman MD, Jacobs JJ (2015) Do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(8):2521–2529 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu F, Gross TP (2013) A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplast 28(7):1224–1230 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahman WA, Greidanus NV, Siegmeth A et al. (2013) Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):444–453 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Hamad M, Le Duff MJ, Takamura KM, Amstutz HC (2014) Acetabular component thickness does not affect mid-term clinical results in hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(5):1528–1534 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Johnson AJ (2012) Socket position determines hip resurfacing 10-year survivorship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3127–3133 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gross TP, Liu F (2012) Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(1):27–34 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2015) Aseptic loosening of cobalt chromium monoblock sockets after hip resurfacing. Hip Int 25(5):466–470 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H et al. (2014) Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Jt J 96-b(10):1298–1306 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM et al. (2009) Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):66–71 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH et al. (2007) Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplast 22(7 Suppl 3):66–71 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM (2006) Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220(2):345–353 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2015) Hip resurfacing: history, current status, and future. Hip Int 25(4):330–338 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tai CL, Chen YC, Hsieh PH (2014) The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing—a finite element simulation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:262 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH (2004) A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: part I: the role of materials. J Arthroplast 19(8 Suppl 3):118–123 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Canadian Arthroplasty Society (2013) The Canadian Arthroplasty Society’s experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips. Bone Jt J 95-b(8):1045–1051 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matharu GS, Berryman F, Brash L et al. (2015) Predicting high blood metal ion concentrations following hip resurfacing. Hip Int 25(6):510–519 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zylberberg AD, Nishiwaki T, Kim PR, Beaule PE (2015) Clinical results of the conserve plus metal on metal hip resurfacing: an independent series. J Arthroplast 30(1):68–73 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2018) Is a cementless fixation of the femoral component suitable for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? Hip Int.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018815055 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tice A, Kim P, Dinh L et al. (2015) A randomised controlled trial of cemented and cementless femoral components for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a bone mineral density study. Bone Jt J 97-b(12):1608–1614 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R et al. (2013) Predictors of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplast 28(1):110–116 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shimmin AJ, Back D (2005) Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 87(4):463–464 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Beaule PE, Campbell P, Lu Z et al. (2006) Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 88(Suppl 4):85–96 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zustin J, Krause M, Breer S et al. (2010) Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 92(2):404–410 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Catelas I, Bobyn JD, Medley JB et al. (2003) Size, shape, and composition of wear particles from metal-metal hip simulator testing: effects of alloy and number of loading cycles. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 67(1):312–327 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG (2006) A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 88(8):997–1002 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wolf T, Kasemann R, Ottenwalder H (1989) Molecular interaction of different chromium species with nucleotides and nucleic acids. Carcinogenesis 10(4):655–659 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Birincioglu M, Rodriguez H (2002) Free radical-induced damage to DNA: mechanisms and measurement. Free Radic Biol Med 32(11):1102–1115 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Boardman DR, Middleton FR, Kavanagh TG (2006) A benign psoas mass following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 88(3):402–404 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T et al. (2009) Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 91(8):1025–1030 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Amstutz HC, Wisk LE, Le Duff MJ (2011) Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26(2):198–208 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    von Schewelov T, Sanzen L (2010) Catastrophic failure due to aggressive metallosis 4 years after hip resurfacing in a woman in her forties—a case report. Acta Orthop 81(3):402–404 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gruber FW, Bock A, Trattnig S et al. (2007) Cystic lesion of the groin due to metallosis: a rare long-term complication of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(6):923–927 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    De Haan R, Campbell PA, Su EP, De Smet KA (2008) Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 90(9):1158–1163 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J et al. (2009) The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 91(6):738–744 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA et al. (2005) An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 87(1):18–27 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al. (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 87(1):28–36 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Catelas I, Lehoux EA, Hurda I et al. (2015) Do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12):3903–3914 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al. (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 91(12):1566–1574 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pandit H, Vlychou M, Whitwell D et al. (2008) Necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours in bilateral resurfacing hip arthoplasties: evidence for a type IV immune response. Virchows Arch 453(5):529–534 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Campbell P, Shimmin A, Walter L, Solomon M (2008) Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplast 23(7):1080–1085 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Langton DJ, Sidaginamale RP, Joyce TJ et al. (2013) The clinical implications of elevated blood metal ion concentrations in asymptomatic patients with MoM hip resurfacings: a cohort study. BMJ Open 3(3):e001541 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P et al. (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 90(7):847–851 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Malviya A, Holland JP (2009) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience. Acta Orthop Belg 75(4):477–483 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S et al. (2010) Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(9):2321–2327 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ (2012) Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 94(3):315–321 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ et al. (2005) Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 87(7):1515–1521 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    van der Weegen W, Sijbesma T, Hoekstra HJ et al. (2014) Treatment of pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing based on magnetic resonance imaging, metal ion levels and symptoms. J Arthroplast 29(2):416–421 Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Moroni A, Miscione MT, Orsini R et al. (2017) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre. Hip Int 27(2):134–139 Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Azam MQ, McMahon S, Hawdon G, Sankineani SR (2016) Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years’ follow-up. Int Orthop 40(1):1–7 Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M (2012) Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 94(4):471–476 Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Nwaboku HC, Bajekal RA (2006) Sporting activity following Birmingham hip resurfacing. Int J Sports Med 27(6):505–507 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Naal FD, Maffiuletti NA, Munzinger U, Hersche O (2007) Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 35(5):705–711 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Banerjee M, Bouillon B, Banerjee C et al. (2010) Sports activity after total hip resurfacing. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1229–1236 Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Eethakota VV, Vaishnav V, Johnston L (2018) Comparison of revision risks and complication rates between total HIP replacement and HIP resurfacing within the similar age group. Surgeon 16(6):339–349 Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Smith TO, Nichols R, Donell ST, Hing CB (2010) The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Orthop 81(6):684–695 Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Marshall DA, Pykerman K, Werle J et al. (2014) Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(7):2217–2230 Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vendittoli PA, Roy A, Mottard S et al. (2010) Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations: a follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 92(1):12–19 Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV et al. (2010) The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):318–325 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana Ortopedici Traumatologi Ospedalieri d’Italia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e TraumatologiaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItalia
  2. 2.ASST Pini-CTOReparto OT1MilanoItalia

Personalised recommendations