Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quando e come ricostruire la linea articolare e un corretto bilanciamento legamentoso nella riprotesizzazione

When and how to rebuild the joint line providing a sound ligament balancing in revision knee arthroplasty

  • Aggiornamenti
  • Published:
LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

Abstract

Revision knee surgery is a complex and challenging procedure. Surgeons have to face more complex problems than in primary TKA. Bone loss and soft tissue imbalance are a primary concern after failed total knee arthroplasty. The goals of revision total knee arthroplasty are the same as those of primary surgery: restoring a normal knee anatomy, regaining function, providing stability and a pain free knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Porteous AJ, Hassaballa MA, Newman JH (2008) Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg, Br 90-B(7):879–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG et al. (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 68-A:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozkurt B, Sen T, Cankaya D et al. (2016) The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intraoperative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Res 5(7):280–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beckmann NA, Müller S, Gondan M et al. (2015) Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allograft and porous metal cones—a systematic review. J Arthroplast 30:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sculco PK, Abdel MP, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2016) The management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt J 98-B(1 Suppl A):120–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huten D (2013) Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatoll-Sur 99S:S22–S33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasparini G (2009) Gestione dei difetti ossei con augments nella chirurgia di revisione del ginocchio. GIOT 35(Suppl 1):S37–S409

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hockman DE, Ammeen D, Engh GA (2005) Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 20:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamath AF, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2015) Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 97-A:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SC Ortopedia Traumatologia, Centro Regionale di Chirurgia Protesica, AO SS Antonio e Biagio, C. Arrigo, Alessandria, Italia

    M. Schiraldi, V. De Tullio, G. Bonzanini & D. Chirillo

  2. SC Ortopedia Traumatologia, Ospedale Maggiore di Chieri (TO), Chieri, Italia

    E. Novarese

Authors
  1. M. Schiraldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. De Tullio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Bonzanini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Novarese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Chirillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Schiraldi.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori M. Schiraldi, V. De Tullio, G. Bonzanini, E. Novarese e D. Chirillo dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiraldi, M., De Tullio, V., Bonzanini, G. et al. Quando e come ricostruire la linea articolare e un corretto bilanciamento legamentoso nella riprotesizzazione. LO SCALPELLO 31, 132–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-017-0213-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-017-0213-0

Search

Navigation