Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Il trattamento del ginocchio rigido protesizzato

Treatment of stiff total knee arthroplasty

  • Aggiornamenti
  • Published:
LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

Abstract

Stiffness is a disabling complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), leading to important limitation in the range of movement and affecting patient ability to perform daily activities. In this study, 25 records were considered to describe the most common treatment for prosthetic knee stiffness.

Manipulation under anaesthesia is the first option in early arthrofibrosis, arthroscopic arthrolysis is usually performed 3 to 6 months after TKA, while arthrotomic arthrolysis has to be considered a second-line treatment. Revision arthroplasty should only be used in selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Donaldson JR, Tudor F, Gollish J et al (2016) Revision surgery for the stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt 98-B(5):622–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson DP (2004) The effect of continuous passive motion on wound-healing and joint mobility after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 72(3):421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen CP, Crawford JJ, Olin MD, Vail TP (2002) Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C et al. (2006) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee 13(2):111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA (2004) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 86-A:1479–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ipach I, Schäfer R, Lahrmann J, Kluba T (2011) Stiffness after knee arthrotomy: evaluation of prevalence and results after manipulation under anaesthesia. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):292–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keating EM, Ritter MA, Harty LD et al. (2007) Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 89(2):282–286

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gandhi R, de Beer J, Leone J et al. (2006) Predictive risk factors for stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21(1):46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Tartarone M (2009) Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 10:111–118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mariani PP, Santori N, Rovere P et al. (1997) Histological and structural study of the adhesive tissue in knee fibroarthrosis: a clinical-pathological correlation. Arthroscopy 13(3):313–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruppert M, Theiss C, KnößP et al. (2013) Histopathological, immunohistochemical criteria and confocal laser-scanning data of arthrofibrosis. Pathol Res Pract 209:681–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Esler CN, Lock K, Harper WM, Gregg PJ (1999) Manipulation of total knee replacements. Is the flexion gained retained? J Bone Jt Surg, Br 81(1):27–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riazuddin M, Shakir S, Naveed A (2009) Manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness following knee arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(3):220–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scranton PE (2001) Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16(4):428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cates HE, Schmidt JM (2009) Closed manipulation after total knee arthroplasty: outcome and affecting variables. Orthopedics 32(6):398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubinstein RA, DeHaan A (2010) The incidence and results of manipulation after primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 17(1):29–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maloney WJ (2002) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Arthroplast 17(4):71–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arbuthnot JE, Brink RB (2010) Arthroscopic arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement gives moderate improvements in range of motion and functional knee scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(3):346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson DR, Friedman RJ, McGinty JB et al. (1990) The role of arthroscopy in the problem total knee replacement. Arthroscopy 6(1):30–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bae DK, Lee HK, Cho JH (1995) Arthroscopy of symptomatic total knee replacements. Arthroscopy 11(6):664–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Teng HP, Lu YC, Hsu CJ et al. (2002) Arthroscopy following total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25(4):422–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Babis GC, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Morrey BF (2001) Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg, Am 83(10):1534–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hutchinson JR, Parish EN, Cross MJ (2005) Results of open arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt 87(10):1357–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Marulanda GA et al. (2006) Surgical treatment and customized rehabilitation for stiff knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keeney JA, Clohisy JC, Curry M, Maloney WJ (2005) Revision total knee arthroplasty for restricted motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:135–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Marcovigi.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori Andrea Marcovigi, Francesco Zambianchi, Elena Francioni, Francesco Fiacchi, Andrea Giorgini, Dario Sandoni e Fabio Catani dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcovigi, A., Zambianchi, F., Francioni, E. et al. Il trattamento del ginocchio rigido protesizzato. LO SCALPELLO 31, 138–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-017-0211-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-017-0211-2

Navigation