Abstract
Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus are the most common pathologies of the first metatarsal head. Their symptoms include joint pain during motion, especially in the push-off phases of walking, and a limited ROM, especially during extension, which can lead to alterations in the normal foot biomechanics as well as to skin alterations in the most severe cases. This is why clinical assessment of the status and radiographic examinations are necessary to formulate a proper diagnosis. Conservative treatment often represents a palliative care measure; however, it is the first therapeutic approach considered before switching to surgical procedures, such as cheilotomy, mostly used in the initial phases of the disease, and other osteotomy techniques, all performed through minimally invasive surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Lucas DE, Hunt KJ (2015) Hallux rigidus: relevant anatomy pathophysiology. Foot Ankle Clin 20(3):381–389
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2003) Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 24:731–743
Hamid KS, Parekh SG (2015) Clinical presentation and management of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin 20(3):391–399
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2003) Hallux rigidus: grading and long term results of operative treatment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85(11):2072–2088
Kunnasegaran R, Thevendran G (2015) Hallux rigidus nonoperative treatment and orthotics. Foot Ankle Clin N Am 20:401–412
Hartrup SJ, Johnson KA (1998) Subjective results of hallux rigidus following treatment with cheilectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:182–191
Mesa-Ramos M, Mesa-Ramos F, Carpintero P (2008) Evaluation of the treatment of hallux rigidus by percutaneous surgery. Acta Orthop Belg 74(2):222–226
Vasso M, Del Regno C, D’Amelio A, Schiavone Panni A (2015) A modified Austin/chevron osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. J Orthop Traumatol 17(1):89–93
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflitto di interesse
Gli autori M. Biserni, G. Giustelli, D. Bellini, R. Amendola dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.
Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici
Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.
Human and Animal Rights
L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biserni, M., Giustelli, G., Bellini, D. et al. Trattamento dell’alluce rigido. LO SCALPELLO 30, 153–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-016-0173-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-016-0173-9