Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

I distacchi epifisari del ginocchio

Distal femoral and proximal tibia epiphyseal fractures

  • Aggiornamenti
  • Published:
LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

Abstract

Distal femoral and proximal tibia epiphyseal fractures are rare, but they have a high incidence of complications. The Salter-Harris classification remains the most used classification system. Radiographic evaluation should be accompanied by meticulous neurovascular status monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Kasser JR, Beaty JH (eds) (2009) Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poland J (1898) Traumatic separation of the epiphyses. Smith, Elder & Co, Londra

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salter RB, Harris WR (1963) Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 45:587–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson CA, Peterson HA (1972) Analysis of the incidence of injuries to the epiphyseal growth plate. J Trauma 12(4):275–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Odgen JA (2000) Proximal tibial epiphyseal injuries. In: Odgen JA (ed) Skeletal injury in the child, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 1005–1010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aydin A, Topal M, Tuncer K, Şenocak E (2012) Salter-Harris Type III and Type IV combined fracture of the distal femoral epiphysis: a case report. Case Rep Orthop 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/317848. Hindawi Publishing Corporation

  7. Tachdjian MO (2008) Pediatric orthopaedics, 4th edn. Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCrory P (2003) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1512–1526

    Google Scholar 

  9. Riseborough EJ, Barrett IR, Shapiro F (1983) Growth disturbances following distal femoral physeal fracture-separations. J Bone Jt Surg Am 65:885–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gulabi D, Erdem M, Bulut G et al. (2013) Ipsilateral distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyseal growth plate injury: a case report. J Med Case Rep 7:146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Arkader A, Warner WC, Horn BD et al. (2007) Predicting the outcome of physeal fractures of the distal femur. J Pediatr Orthop 27:703–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aitken AP (1965) Fractures of the proximal tibial epiphysial cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 41:92–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stephens DC, Louis E, Louis DS (1974) Traumatic separation of the distal femoral epiphyseal cartilage plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 56:1383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lombardo SJ, Harvey JP Jr (1977) Fractures of the distal femoral epiphyses. Factors influencing prognosis: a review of thirty-four cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am 59:742–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertin KC, Goble EM (1983) Ligament injuries associated with physeal fractures about the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177:188

    Google Scholar 

  16. Basener CJ, Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG (2009) Growth disturbance after distal femoral growth plate fractures in children: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23:663–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vrettakos AN, Evaggelidis DC, Kyrkos MJ et al. (2012) Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 13:7–11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Beslikas T, Christodoulou A, Chytas A et al (2012) Genu recurvatum deformity in a child due to Salter-Harris Type V fracture of the proximal tibial physis treated with high tibial dome osteotomy. Case Rep Orthop 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/219231. Hindawi Publishing Corporation

  19. Blanks RH, Lester DK, Shaw BA (1994) Flexion-type Salter II fracture of the proximal tibia. Proposed mechanism of injury and two case studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:256–259

    Google Scholar 

  20. Donahue JP, Brennan JF, Barron OA (2003) Combined physeal/apophyseal fracture of the proximal tibia with anterior angulation from an indirect force: report of 2 cases. Am J Orthop 32(12):604–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Potenza V, Caterini R, Maglione P et al. (2011) Simultaneous bilateral flexion—Type Salter-Harris II fractures of the proximal tibia: a case report and review of the literature. Open Orthop J 5:315–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mubarak SJ (2009) Classification of proximal tibial fractures in children. J Child Orthop 3:191–197

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Clement ND, Goswami A (2009) Salter-Harris II injury of the proximal tibial epiphysis with both vascular compromise and compartment syndrome: a case report. J Orthop Surg Res 4:23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gautier E, Ziran BH, Egger B et al. (1998) Growth disturbances after injuries of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 118(1–2):37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Burkhart SS, Peterson HA (1979) Fractures of the proximal tibial epiphysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 61:996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shelton WR, Canale ST (1979) Fractures of the tibia through the proximal tibial epiphyseal cartilage. J Bone Jt Surg Am 61:167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Poulsen TD, Skak SV, Jensen TT (1989) Epiphyseal fractures of the proximal tibia. Injury 20:111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wozasek GE, Moser KD, Haller H et al. (1991) Trauma involving the proximal tibial epiphysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 110:301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Atkin DM, Fithian DC, Marangi KS et al. (2000) Characteristics of patients with primary acute lateral patellar dislocation and their recovery within the first 6 months of injury. Am J Sports Med 28:472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pournaras DI (2006) Operative orthopaedics, 1st edn. Kodikas, Thessaloniki, pp 393–394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Pavone.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori Vito Pavone, Flavia Alberghina e Giuseppe Sessa dichiarano di non aver alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and animal rights

Per questo tipo di studio non è richiesto l’inserimento di alcuna dichiarazione relativa agli studi effettuati su esseri umani e animali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavone, V., Alberghina, F. & Sessa, G. I distacchi epifisari del ginocchio. LO SCALPELLO 29, 147–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0118-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0118-8

Navigation