, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 118–122 | Cite as

La stenosi del canale vertebrale lombare: il trattamento decompressivo

  • Eu. Boux
  • A. Siclari
  • El. Boux
  • V. Salvi

Lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompressive treatment


Lumbar spinal stenosis is characterized by radicular pain appearing after walking, decreasing with rest and reappearing when walking restarts (claudicatio intermittens). The syndrome is caused by the narrowing of the lumbar canal at the discal space because of osteophytes which are present both anteriorly and posteriorly. Relief of the symptoms can be achieved with recalibration of the lumbar spinal canal. At first the removal of pathological tissue was generous but it led to secondary instability. The evolution of surgical techniques led to more conservative procedures obtaining both stability and decompression.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Verbiest H (1954) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br 36:230–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roy-Camille R, Benazet JP, Viale P et al (1988) Place de l’ostéosynthèse du rachis lombaire associée à la cure chirurgicale des canaux lombaires étroits. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74[Suppl. 2]:70–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Louis R, Tropiano R (1990) La laminectomie d’elargissement canalaire. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 76[Suppl. 1]:51–54Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senegas J, Etchevers JP, Vital JM et al (1988) Le recalibrage du canal lombaire, alternative à la laminectomie dans le traitement des sténoses du canal lombaire. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74[Suppl. 2]:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crock HV (1983) Practice of spinal surgery. Springer, Wien, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foley K, Smith M (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 4:301–307Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jönsson B, Annertz M, Sjöberg C, Strömqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Fiveyear follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22:2938–2944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemaire JJ, Sautreax JL, Chabannes J et al (1995) Le canal lombaire sténosé: étude rétrospective de 158 cas opérés. Neurochirurgie 41:89–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Javid MJ, Hadar EJ (1998) Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 89:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCulloch JA (1998) Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 23:2243–2252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palmer S, Davison L (2012) Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Two-year follow-up in 54 patients. Surg Neurol Int 3:41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Celik H, Derincek A, Koksal I (2012) Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height? Turk Neurosurg 22:50–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Postacchini R, Ferrari E, Cinotti G et al (2011) Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 11:933–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eu. Boux
    • 1
  • A. Siclari
    • 2
  • El. Boux
    • 3
  • V. Salvi
  1. 1.Ospedale degli InfermiBiellaItaly
  2. 2.SC Ortopedia e TraumatologiaOspedale degli InfermiBiellaItaly
  3. 3.SC Ortopedia Oncologica e RicostruttivaCTO TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations