Agresti A (2010) Analysis of ordinal categorical data, 2nd edn. Wiley, NY
Book
Google Scholar
Bogue J, Ritson C (2004) Understanding consumers perceptions of product quality for lighter dairy products through the integration of marketing and sensory information. Acta Agr Scand C-Econ 1:67–77
Google Scholar
Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
Breiman L (2001) Random forest. Mach Learn 45:5–32
MATH
Article
Google Scholar
Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall, NY
MATH
Google Scholar
Brentari E, Carpita M, Vezzoli M (2012) CRAGGING: a novel approach for inspecting Italian wine quality. In: Proceedings of the 12th European symposium on statistical methods for the food industry. Agrostat 2012, Paris, pp 343–350
Brentari E, Levaggi R, Zuccolotto P (2011) Pricing strategies for Italian red wine. Food Qual Prefer 22:725–732
Article
Google Scholar
Brentari E, Zuccolotto P (2010) The implicit value of chemical and sensorial quality in the hedonic analysis of low-priced Italian red wines. In: Proceedings of the 11th European symposium on statistical methods for the food industry. Agrostat 2010, Benevento, pp 269–276
Brentari E, Zuccolotto P (2011) The impact of chemical and sensory characteristics on the market price of Italian red wines. Electron J Appl Stat An 4:265–276
Google Scholar
Cicia G, Corduas M, Del Giudice T, Piccolo D (2010) Valuing consumer preferences with the CUB model: a case study of fair trade coffee. Int J Food System Dynamics 1:82–93
Google Scholar
Corduas M, Iannario M, Piccolo D (2009) A class of statistical models for evaluating services and performances. In: Bini M (ed) Statistical methods for the evaluation of educational services and quality of products. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–117
Chapter
Google Scholar
Corduas M, Cinquanta L, Ievoli C (2012) A statistical analysis of consumer perception of wine attributes. Quad Stat 14:77–80
Google Scholar
D’Elia A, Piccolo D (2005) A mixture model for preference data analysis. Comput Stat Data An 49:917–934
MathSciNet
MATH
Article
Google Scholar
Everitt BS, Hand DJ (1981) Finite mixture distributions. Chapman & Hall, London
MATH
Book
Google Scholar
Friedman JH, Popescu BE (2005) Predictive learning via rule ensembles. Technical report, Stanford University, Department of Statistics
Iannario M (2007) A statistical approach for modelling urban audit perception surveys. Quad Stat 9:149–172
Google Scholar
Iannario M (2009) Fitting measures for ordinal data models. Quad Stat 11:39–72
Google Scholar
Iannario M (2010) On the identifiability of a mixture model for ordinal data. Metron LXVIII:87–94
Google Scholar
Iannario M (2012a) Modelling shelter choices in a class of mixture models for ordinal responses. Stat Method Appl 21:1–22
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
Iannario M (2012b) Preliminary estimators for a mixture model of ordinal data. Adv Data Anal Classif 6:163–184
Google Scholar
Iannario M, Piccolo D (2009) A program in cub models inference, Version 2.0. http://www.dipstat.unina.it/CUBmodels1/
Iannario M, Piccolo D (2010) A new statistical model for the analysis of customer satisfaction. Qual Technol Quantit Manag 7:149–168
Google Scholar
Iannario M, Piccolo D (2012) CUB models: statistical methods and empirical evidence. In: Kenett RS, Salini S (eds) Modern analysis of customer surveys. Wiley, NY, pp 231–254
Google Scholar
Köster EP (2003) The psychology of food choice: some often encountered fallacies. Food Qual Prefer 14:359–373
Article
Google Scholar
Köster EP (2009) Diversity in the determinants of food choice: a psychological perspective. Food Qual Prefer 20:70–82
Article
Google Scholar
McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B 42:109–142
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London
MATH
Google Scholar
McLachlan G, Krishnan T (2008) The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, NY
MATH
Book
Google Scholar
McLachlan G, Peel GJ (2000) Finite mixture models. Wiley, NY
MATH
Book
Google Scholar
Manisera M, Piccolo D, Zuccolotto P (2011) Analyzing and modelling rating data for sensory analysis in food industry. Quad Stat 13:69–82
Google Scholar
Philippe F, Schacher L, Adolphe DC, Dacremont C (2003) The sensory panel applied to textile goods a new marketing tool. J Fash Mark Manag 7:235–248
Google Scholar
Piccolo D (2003) On the moments of a mixture of uniform and shifted binomial random variables. Quad Stat 5:85–104
Google Scholar
Piccolo D (2006) Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quad Stat 8:33–78
Google Scholar
Piccolo D, D’Elia A (2008) A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. Food Qual Prefer 19:247–259
Article
Google Scholar
Piccolo D, Iannario M (2010) A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. In: Proceedings of the 11th European symposium on statistical methods for the food industry. University of Sannio, Benevento, Academy School, Afragola, pp 139–148
Sandri M, Zuccolotto P (2008) A bias correction algorithm for the Gini measure of variable importance. J Comput Graph Stat 17:1–18
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
Sandri M, Zuccolotto P (2009) Analysis and correction of bias in total decrease in node impurity measures for tree-based algorithms. Stat Comput 20:393–407
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Augustin T (2007) Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index. Comput Stat Data An 52:483–501
MathSciNet
MATH
Article
Google Scholar
Van Trijp HCM, Schifferstein HNJ (1995) Sensory analysis in marketing practice: comparison and integration. J Sens Stud 10:127–147
Article
Google Scholar
Zironi R, Odello L, Brentari E (2003) Un nuovo indice per misurare la qualità edonica del vino. Il Sommelier 19:15–17
Google Scholar