Adaptive dissimilarity index for measuring time series proximity

  • Ahlame Douzal ChouakriaEmail author
  • Panduranga Naidu Nagabhushan
Regular Article


The most widely used measures of time series proximity are the Euclidean distance and dynamic time warping. The latter can be derived from the distance introduced by Maurice Fréchet in 1906 to account for the proximity between curves. The major limitation of these proximity measures is that they are based on the closeness of the values regardless of the similarity w.r.t. the growth behavior of the time series. To alleviate this drawback we propose a new dissimilarity index, based on an automatic adaptive tuning function, to include both proximity measures w.r.t. values and w.r.t. behavior. A comparative numerical analysis between the proposed index and the classical distance measures is performed on the basis of two datasets: a synthetic dataset and a dataset from a public health study.


Classification Time Series Fréchet distance Dynamic time warping 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alt H, Godau M (1992) Measuring the resemblance of polygonal curves. In: Proceedings of 8th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry. ACM Press, Berlin, pp 102–109Google Scholar
  2. Caiado J, Crato N, Pena D (2006) A periodogram-based metric for time series classification. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:2668–2684CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chouakria Douzal A (2003). Compression technique preserving correlations of a multivariate temporal sequence. In: Berthold MR, Lenz HJ, Bradley E, Kruse R, Borgelt C (eds). Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 566–577Google Scholar
  4. Eiter T, Mannila H (1994) Computing discrete Fréchet distance. Technical report CD-TR 94/64, Christian Doppler Laboratory for expert systems. TU Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  5. Fréchet M (1906) Sur quelques points du calcul fonctionnel. Rend Circ Math Palermo 22:1–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garcia-Escudero LA, Gordaliza A (2005) A proposal for robust curve clustering. J Classif 22:185-201CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Godau M (1991) A natural metric for curves—computing the distance for polygonal chains and approximation algorithms. In: Proceedings of 8th Symposium Theoretical Aspects of Computation Science, Springer, Lecture notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag New York, pp 127–136Google Scholar
  8. Heckman NE, Zamar RH (2000) Comparing the shapes of regression functions. Biometrika 22:135–144CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Hennig C, Hausdorf B (2006). Design of dissimilarity measure: a new dissimilarity measure between species distribution ranges. In: Batagelj V, Bock HH, Ferligoj A, Z̆iberna A (eds). Data science and classification. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin, pp 29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kakizawa Y, Shumway RH, Taniguchi N (1998) Discrimination and clustering for multivariate time series. J Am Stat Assoc 93(441): 328–340CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaslow RA, Ostrow DG (1987) The multicenter AIDS cohort study: rational, organization and selected characteristics of the participants. Am J Epidemiol 126:310–18Google Scholar
  12. Keller K, Wittfeld K (2004) Distances of time series components by means of symbolic dynamics. Int J Bifurc Chaos 14:693–704CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Liao WT (2005) Clustering of time series data—a survey. Pattern Recognit 38:1857–1874CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Maharaj EA (2000) Cluster of time series. J Classif 17:297–314CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Moller-Levet CS, Klawonn F, Cho KH, Wolkenhauer O (2003). Fuzzy clustering of short time series and unevenly distributed sampling points. In: Berthold MR, Lenz HJ, Bradley E, Kruse R, Borgelt C (eds). Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 330–340Google Scholar
  16. Oates T, Firoiou L, Cohen PR (1999) Clustering time series with Hidden Markov Models and Dynamic Time Warping. In: Proceedings of 6th IJCAI-99, Workshop on Neural, Symbolic and Reinforcement Learning Methods for Sequence Learning. Stockholm, pp 17–21Google Scholar
  17. Sankoff D, Kruskal JB ed. (1983) Time warps, string edits, and macromolecules: the theory and practice of sequence comparison. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  18. Serban N, Wasserman L (2004) CATS: cluster after transformation and smoothing. J Am Stat Assoc 100:990–999CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahlame Douzal Chouakria
    • 1
    Email author
  • Panduranga Naidu Nagabhushan
    • 2
  1. 1.TIMC-IMAGUniversité Joseph Fourier Grenoble 1CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Studies in Computer ScienceUniversity of Mysore ManasagangothriMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations