Skip to main content
Log in

Computation of peak output for inputs restricted in L 2 and L norms using finite difference schemes and convex optimization

  • Published:
International Journal of Automation and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Control systems designed by the principle of matching gives rise to problems of evaluating the peak output. This paper proposes a practical method for computing the peak output of linear time-invariant and non-anticipative systems for a class of possible sets that are characterized with many bounding conditions on the two- and/or the infinity-norms of the inputs and their derivatives. The original infinite-dimensional convex optimization problem is approximated as a large-scale convex programme defined in a Euclidean space, which are associated with sparse matrices and thus can be solved efficiently in practice. The numerical results show that the method performs satisfactorily, and that using a possible set with many bounding conditions can help to reduce the design conservatism and thereby yield a better match.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Zakian. Well Matched Systems. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Zakian. Perspectives on the Principle of Matching and the Method of Inequalities. International Journal of Control, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 147–175, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Zakian. Foundation of Control Systems Design. Control Systems Design — A New Framework, V. Zakian (ed.), Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 3–93, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Zakian. On Performance Criteria. International Journal of Control, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1089–1092, 1986.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. N. K. Rutland. The Principle of Matching: Practical Conditions for Systems with Inputs Restricted in Magnitude and Rate of Change. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 550–553, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. P. G. Lane. Design of Control Systems with Inputs and Outputs Satisfying Certain Bounding Conditions, Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. G. Lane. The Principle of Matching: A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Inputs Restricted in Magnitude and Rate of Change. International Journal of Control, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 893–915, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S. P. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Sturm. Use SeDuMi 1.02, A Matlab Toolbox for Optimization over Symmetric Cones. Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 11, no. 1–4, pp. 625–653, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. P. G. Lane. Matching Conditions for Transient Inputs. Control Systems Design — A New Framework, V. Zakian (ed.), Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 97–119, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Arunsawatwong. Critical Control of Building under Seismic Disturbance. Control Systems Design — A New Framework, V. Zakian (ed.), Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 339–354, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. T. Chen. Linear System Thoery and Design, 3rd Edition Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Kincaid, W. Cheney. Numerial Analysis: Mathematics of Scientific Computing, 3rd Edition, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, pp. 466–483, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. H. Tütüncü, K. C. Toh, M. J. Todd. Solving Semidefinite-quadratic-linear Programs Using SDPT3. Mathematical Programming — Series B, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 189–217, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suchin Arunsawatwong.

Additional information

Warit Silpsrikul received the B.Eng. and M.Eng. degrees in electrical engineering from Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, in 1996 and 2000, respectively. He is currently a Ph. D. student at the Department of Electrical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University.

His research interest includes the application of the method of inequalities and the principle of matching to engineering problems.

Suchin Arunsawatwong received the B.Eng. and M.Eng. degrees in electrical engineering from Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, in 1985 and 1988, respectively, and Ph.D. degree in control engineering from the Control Systems Centre, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK, in 1995. He is currently an assistant professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University.

His research interests include stability of delay differential systems, numerical solution of differential equations, and control systems design by the method of inequalities and the principle of matching

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silpsrikul, W., Arunsawatwong, S. Computation of peak output for inputs restricted in L 2 and L norms using finite difference schemes and convex optimization. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 6, 7–13 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-009-0007-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-009-0007-9

Keywords

Navigation