Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon stock of trees along an elevational gradient in temperate forests of Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Forest Science and Practice


The estimation of carbon density of high altitude forests was carried out at fi ve different sites along an elevational gradient from 1550 m to 3550 m in a part of Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary, which is one of the largest protected areas of the Garhwal Himalaya, India. Among the study sites the above ground biomass density (AGBD) ranged from 202.72 Mg·ha−1 (Site 5) to 718.75 Mg·ha−1 (Site 1) and below ground biomass density (BGBD) from 61.00 Mg·ha−1 (Site 5) to 203.04 Mg·ha−1 (Site 1). The total biomass density (TBD) also followed similar trend, where the lowest value (263.73 Mg·ha−1) was observed at Site 5 and the highest (921.79 Mg·ha−1) at Site 1. The total carbon density (TCD) ranged from 131.86 Mg·ha−1 (Site 5) to 460.89 Mg·ha−1 (Site 1), which indicates that the carbon density of forests reduces with increasing elevation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Anonymous. 2004. Forest carbon sequestration. Catalyst, 3: 1–4.

  • Baes Jr CF, Goeller HE, Olson JS, Rotty RM. 1977. Carbon dioxide and climate: The uncontrolled experiment. Am Sci, 65: 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Lugo AE. 1982. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle. Biotropica, 14(3): 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL, Schroeder P. Kern JS. 1999. Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA. For Ecol Manage, 123(1): 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker DE, DeClerck F, Bradford JC, Colwell RK, Perfecto I, Phillips OL, Sankaran M, Naeem S. 2005. Species loss and aboveground carbon storage in a tropical forest. Science, 310: 1029–1031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia, 111: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi AN. 1973. General Standard Volume Tables for Semal (Bombax ceiba L.). Indian Forest Records. vol. 12. Manager of Publications, Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India, pp 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan BL, Rasal GB. 2010. Sequestered standing carbon stock in selective tree species grown in University campus at Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. Int J Eng Sci Technol, 2(7): 3003–3007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra A, Palria S, Dadhwal VK. 2002. Growing stockbased forest biomass estimate for India. Biomass Bioenergy, 22(3): 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke FW. 1908. Data on Geochemistry. US Geological Survey Bulletin 330, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSI (Forest Survey of India). 1996. Volume equations for forests of India, Nepal and Bhutan. FSI, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gairola S, Sharma CM, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S. 2011. Live tree biomass and carbon variation along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya (India). Curr Sci, 100(12): 1862–1870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorte RW. 2009. US tree planting for carbon sequestration. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburg SP. 2000. Simple rules for measuring changes in ecosystem carbon in forestry-offset projects. Miti Adapt Strat Global Change, 5(1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA. 2005. Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global Change Biol, 11(6): 945–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2000. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land-use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Haryana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasmin KSS, Birundha VD. 2011. Adaptation of climate change through forest carbon sequestration in Tamilnadu, India. Int J Res Commer Manage, 1(8): 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight DH. 1963. A distance method for constructing forest profile diagrams and obtaining structural data. Trop Ecol, 4: 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE, Brown S. 1992. Tropical forests as sinks of atmospheric carbon. For Ecol Manage, 54: 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Meir P, Brown S. 2002. Forests, carbon and global climate. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A, 360: 1567–1591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Porras C. 1998. Evaluating the role of plantations as carbon sinks: An example of an integrative approach from the humid tropics. Environ Manage, 22: 459–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Negi JDS, Manhas RK, Chauhan PS. 2003. Carbon allocation in different components of some tree species of India: A new approach for carbon estimation. Curr Sci, 85(11): 1528–1531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Cerri C, Woomer PL, Nugroho K, Bernoux M. 1997. Soil carbon dynamics in the humid tropical forest zone. Geoderma, 79(1–4): 187–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey D. 2002. Fuelwood studies in India: myth and reality. Centre for International Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma CM, Baduni NP, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S. 2010. Tree diversity and carbon stocks of some major forest types of Garhwal Himalaya, India. For Ecol Manage, 260(12): 2170–2179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RP, Jain RC. 1977. General standard volume tables for jamun (Syzygium cumini). Indian Forest Records. vol. 1. Manager of Publications, Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India, pp 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Adhikari BS, Zobel DB. 1994. Biomass productivity, leaf longevity and forest structure in the Central Himalaya. Ecol Monogr, 64: 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Feng Z, Ouyang Z. 2001. The impact of human disturbance on vegetative carbon storage in forest ecosystems in China. For Ecol Manage, 148: 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhat, J.A., Iqbal, K., Kumar, M. et al. Carbon stock of trees along an elevational gradient in temperate forests of Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary. For. Sci. Pract. 15, 137–143 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: