Forestry Studies in China

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 28–35 | Cite as

Effects of closing mountain for forest restoration in the watershed of Miyun reservoir, Beijing

Article

Abstract

The paper provides a systematical analysis of ecological restoration effects of natural secondary forest of closure area in Chao Guanxi Gou, Miyun County, Beijing. The results indicate that through more than twenty years of hillclosing afforestation since 1983, canopy closure has improved almost by 0.2; forest cover rate has raised from 7.2% to 93.8%; biodiversity, tree biomass and vegetation community have increased to a great extent. Compared with the average canopy closure before hillclosing afforestation in this area, it has improved to over 0.4 in average and increased by 0.1-0.2. The forest coverage degree has reached more than 90%. Consequently, the forest plays more important roles in intercepting precipitation, improving water storage capacity of soil, decreasing the surface runoff, and preventing soil and water loss.

Key words

ecological restoration hillclosing afforestation watershed of Miyun Reservoir 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Braeshaw A D. 1983. There construction of ecosystem. Journal of Ecology. 20: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cairns J. 1995. Restoration ecology. Encyclopedia of Environmental Biology. 3: 223–235Google Scholar
  3. Chen H S, Zhao X Y. 2000. The approach and measures for ecological restoration in northwest China. Pratacultural Science. 17(5): 65–68Google Scholar
  4. Henry C P, Amoros C. 1995. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: A scientific base. Environmental Management. 19(6): 891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hobbs R J, Norton D A. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology. 4(2): 93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson L L, Lopukine D, Hillyard D. 1995. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Restoration Ecology. 3(2): 71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jordan W R. 1995. “Sunflower Forest”: ecological restoration as the basis for a new environmental paradigm. In: Beyond Preservation: Restoring and Inventing Landscape (Baldwin A D J ed). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 17–34Google Scholar
  8. Peng S L. 1996. Restoration Ecology and vegetation regeneration. Ecological Science. 15(2): 26–31Google Scholar
  9. Ren H, Peng S L. 2001. Restoration Ecology (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press. 3–9Google Scholar
  10. Yu X X, Yu Z M. 2001. Forest for Water Resources Protection — Afforestation, Management and Evaluation (in Chinese). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. 260–281Google Scholar
  11. Yu Z M, Wang L X. 1999. Effective Study on Water Conservation Forests (in Chinese). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. 32–84Google Scholar
  12. Zhang J E, Xu Q. 1997a. Basic content and structure of Ecological degradation. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation. 17(3): 46–53Google Scholar
  13. Zhang J E, Xu Q. 1997b. Hotspot problem perspective of modern ecology. Study Progress in Geography. 16(3): 29–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Forestry University 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Soil and Water ConservationBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingP. R. China
  2. 2.College of Resources and EnvironmentBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingP. R. China

Personalised recommendations