Skip to main content
Log in

Concentration–discharge patterns of weathering products from global rivers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Geochimica Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Quantifying the functional relationships relating river discharge and weathering products places key constraints on the negative feedback between the silicate weathering and climate. In this study we analyze the concentration–discharge relationships of weathering products from global rivers using previously compiled time-series datasets for concentrations and discharge from global rivers. To analyze the nature of the covariation between specific discharge and concentrations, we use both a power law equation and a recently developed solute production equation. The solute production equation allows us to quantify weathering efficiency, or the resistance to dilution at high runoff, via the Damköhler coefficient. These results are also compared to those derived using average concentration–discharge pairs. Both the power law exponent and the Damköhler coefficient increase and asymptote as catchments exhibit increasingly chemostatic behavior, resulting in an inverse relationship between the two parameters. We also show that using the distribution of average concentration–discharge pairs from global rivers, rather than fitting concentration–discharge relationships for each individual river, underestimates global median weathering efficiency by up to a factor of ~10. This study demonstrates the utility of long time-series sampling of global rivers to elucidate controlling processes needed to quantify patterns in global silicate weathering rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Bluth GJS, Kump LR (1994) Lithologic and climatologic controls of river chemistry. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:2341–2359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves JK, Jost AB, Lau KV, Maher K (2016) Cenozoic carbon cycle imbalances and a variable weathering feedback. Earth Planet Sci Lett 450:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • François LM, Walker JC (1992) Modelling the Phanerozoic carbon cycle and climate: constraints from the 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratio of seawater. Am J Sci 292:81–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillardet J, Dupré B, Louvat P, Allegre CJ (1999) Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem Geol 159:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godsey SE, Kirchner JW, Clow DW (2009) Concentration–discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US catchments. Hydrol Process 23:1844–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothendieck G (2013) nls2: non-linear regression with brute force. R package version 0.2.

  • Ibarra DE, Caves JK, Moon S et al (2016) Differential weathering of basaltic and granitic catchments from concentration–discharge relationships. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 190:265–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kump LR, Arthur MA (1997) Global chemical erosion during the cenozoic: weatherability balances the budgets. Tectonic uplift and climate change. Springer, Boston, pp 399–426

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kump LR, Brantley SL, Arthur MA (2000) Chemical weathering, atmospheric CO2, and climate. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 28:611–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher K (2010) The dependence of chemical weathering rates on fluid residence time. Earth Planet Sci Lett 294:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher K (2011) The role of fluid residence time and topographic scales in determining chemical fluxes from landscapes. Earth Planet Sci Lett 312:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher K, Chamberlain CP (2014) Hydrologic regulation of chemical weathering and the geologic. Science 343:1502–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon S, Chamberlain CP, Hilley GE (2014) New estimates of silicate weathering rates and their uncertainties in global rivers. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 134:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres MA, West AJ, Clark KE (2015) Geomorphic regime modulates hydrologic control of chemical weathering in the Andes–Amazon. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 166:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres MA, Baronas JJ, Clarke KE, Feakins SJ, West AJ (2017) Mixing as a driver of temporal variations in river hydrochemistry. Part 1: insights from conservative traces in the Andes–Amazon transition. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1001/2016WR019733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Blanckenburg F, Bouchez J, Ibarra DE, Maher K (2015) Stable runoff and weathering fluxes into the oceans over Quaternary climate cycles. Nat Geosci 8:538–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Daniel E. Ibarra is partially supported by a Stanford EDGE-STEM Fellowship. This work was initiated under NSF EAR-1254156 to Kate Maher and was also supported by the California Alliance Research Exchange NSF HRD-1306595 to C. Page Chamberlain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Ibarra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

11th International Symposium on Geochemistry of the Earth’s Surface.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibarra, D.E., Moon, S., Caves, J.K. et al. Concentration–discharge patterns of weathering products from global rivers. Acta Geochim 36, 405–409 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: