Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermo-Economic Modeling and Evaluation of Physical Energy Storage in Power System

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess the electrical energy storage technologies, the thermo-economy for both capacity-type and power-type energy storage are comprehensively investigated with consideration of political, environmental and social influence. And for the first time, the Exergy Economy Benefit Ratio (EEBR) is proposed with thermo-economic model and applied to three different storage systems in various scenarios, including pumped storage, compressed air energy storage and flywheel energy storage. The impact of the total system efficiency, annual utilization hour, life time, and other key factors are also analyzed. The results show that the EEBRs of pumped storage and compressed air energy storage under peak load shaving condition and flywheel energy storage under frequency modulation service condition are all larger than zero, which means they are all thermo-economically feasible. With extra consideration of political, environmental and social impact, the exergy cost could reduce by about 25% and the EEBR doubles. The sensitivity analysis indicates the similarity and diversity of influence to EEBR between capacity-type and power-type energy storage systems. The former is that energy efficiency is the dominated factor for all three storage systems. The latter is that the difference of exergy benefit mode causes variety in other major factors. For energy-type storage system, like pumped storage and compressed air storage, the peak-to-valley price ratio is very sensitive in energy arbitrage. For power-type storage system, like flywheel storage, the mileage ratio is in leading position in auxiliary service benefit by mileage. In the three cases studied, the pumped storage has the best thermo-economy; the compressed air energy storage is the second, and the flywheel energy storage is the third. The main reason is that the pumped storage has the least non-exergy cost, and flywheel has the most.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B :

benefit

b :

unit benefit

C :

cost

c :

unit cost

E :

exergy

EEBR:

exergy economy benefit ratio

ex :

exergy coefficient

MR:

mileage ratio

m :

substance quality

N :

life time

P :

power

RC:

regulated capacity

RM:

regulated mileage

RMCCP:

regulation market capability clearing price

RMPCP:

regulation market performance clearing price

SC:

system capacity

T :

time

t :

unit time

δ :

performance factor

ζ :

actual performance score

η :

efficiency

κ :

marginal revenue factor

aux:

in auxiliary service

CO2 :

CO2 emission reduction subsidy

con:

construction

dem:

demand-side management incentive

elec:

electricity

env:

environment

exh:

exhausting

ex:

exergy

fina:

financial

fre:

frequency modulation

in:

inlet

max:

maximum

n, i, j, k :

tensor indexes

nc:

non-energy

new:

additional increased

non, elec:

non-electricity

ope:

operational and maintenance

out:

outlet

peak:

in electric peak-shaving auxiliary service

perp:

permanent

pol:

policy

price:

unit price

rew:

reward-fund standard

soc:

society

sub:

subsidy

tax:

tax preference

tem:

temporary

tot:

total

wat:

water resource fee

wind:

in wind power plant

References

  1. Amrouche S.O., Rekioua D., Rekioua T., Bacha S., Overview of energy storage in renewable energy systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 45(41): 20914–20927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McLarnon F.R., Cairns E.J., Energy storage. Annual Review of Energy, 1989, 14: 241–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen H.S., Cong T.N., Yang W., Tan C.Q., Li Y.L., Ding Y.L., Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review. Progress in Natural Science, 2009, 19: 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IRENA, Electricity storage and renewables: costs and markets to 2030. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mongird K., Viswanathan V., Balducci P., Alam J., Fotedar V., Koritarov V., Hadjerioua B., Energy storage technology and cost characterization report (No.PNNL-28866). U.S. Department of Energy, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1573487.

  6. Technology data for energy storage. The Danish Energy Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020.

  7. Wang J.X., Wang Q.Z., Song N.H., Mission and assignments of thermoeconomics research. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2002, 17: 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng W.L., Huang Q.L., Structural theory of thermoeconomics and its applications. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2005, 37(10): 1388–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu X., Yu Z.T., Zhang X.B., Hu Y.C., Fang M.X., Cen K.F., Analysis of coal poly-generation system based on structural theory of thermo-economics. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2010, 44(3): 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alanne K., Saari K., Kuosa M., Jokisalo J., Martin A.R., Thermo-economic analysis of a micro-cogeneration system based on a rotary steam engine (RSE). Applied Thermal Engineering, 2012, 44: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campos-Celador A., Pérez-Iribarren E., Sala J.M., Portillo-Valdés L.A.D., Thermoeconomic analysis of a micro-CHP installation in a tertiary sector building through dynamic simulation. Energy, 2012, 45(1): 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caliskan H., Dincer I., Hepbasli A., Exergoeconomic and environmental impact analyses of a renewable energy based hydrogen production system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(14): 6104–6111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosio F.D., Verda V., Thermoeconomic analysis of a Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) system integrated with a wind power plant in the framework of the IPEX market. Applied Energy, 2015, 152: 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arabkoohsar A., Machado L., Farzaneh-Gord M., Koury R.N.N., Thermo-economic analysis and sizing of a PV plant equipped with a compressed air energy storage system. Renewable Energy, 2015, 83: 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahdinejad N., Machado L., Koury R.N.N., Valle R.M., Stabilizing a photovoltaic plant power output by employing an auxiliary power source. 2016 7th Power Electronics and Drive Systems Technologies Conference (PEDSTC), Tehran, Iran, 2016, pp. 451–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDSTC.2016.7556903.

  16. Georgiou S., Shah N., Markides C.N., A thermo-economic analysis and comparison of pumped-thermal and liquid-air electricity storage systems. Applied Energy, 2018, 226: 1119–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buonomano A., Calise F., d’Accadia M.D., Vicidomini M., A hybrid renewable system based on wind and solar energy coupled with an electrical storage: Dynamic simulation and economic assessment. Energy, 2018, 155: 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Notice on the pv energy value-added tax policy. State Taxation Administration, Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2013.

  19. Notice to reduce the coal-fired power grid electricity price and the industrial and commercial electricity price. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2015.

  20. Guidance on the promotion of new energy microgrid demonstration project. National Energy Administration of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2015.

  21. Notice on perfecting price formation mechanism of pumped storage power station. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2014.

  22. Provisional measures for the administration of funds for central financial incentives in the integrated pilot demands of urban power demand side management. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) & Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2012.

  23. Beijing Municipal Development and Reform Commission. Financial incentive fund management measures of Beijing municipality demand side management urban integrated pilot project. Beijing Municipal Finance Bureau & Beijing Municipal Commission of Development and Reform, Beijing, China, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Notice on interim measures for printing and distributing additional subsidy funds for renewable energy price. Ministry of Finance & National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) & National Energy Administration of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2012.

  25. Notice on promoting the healthy development of photovoltaic industry by leveraging price leverage. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2013.

  26. Glazer C., Performance based regulation: Year one analysis. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Washington D.C., America, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. White paper of energy storage research. China Energy Storage Alliance, Beijing, China, 2014.

  28. Zhanghewan pumped storage power station in Hebei province. http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=FqSFK9ZRd9AUYHBZgAQhRlWGILqcVe1a_mmXAp5hSb54HhTAPon7UGMFz1qtom3IyCjcEY2LgoNdmpiI2F6z6a, 2020. (Accessed on November 5, 2020).

  29. Economic evaluation guidelines for fossil-fired power plant, DL/T 5435-2009. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of the China, Beijing, China, 2009.

  30. Report on the scheme of pumped storage power station construction in Haizhou open pit of Fuxin city. Fuxin City People’s Government Office, Liaoning, China, 2011.

  31. Akhil A.A., Huff G., Currier A.B., Kaun B.C., Rastler D.M., Chen S.B., Cotter A.L., Bradshaw D.T., Gauntlett W.D., DOE/EPRI 2013 Electricity storage handbook in collaboration with NRECA. Sandia National Laboratories, California, America, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Time-sharing sales price list of Jiangsu province. http://jsb.nea.gov.cn/news/2008-9/2008918104028.html, 2020 (accessed on November 5, 2020).

  33. Liu C., Xu Y.J., Hu S., Chen H.S., Techno-economic analysis of compressed air energy storage power plant. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2015, 4(2): 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eyer J., Benefits from flywheel energy storage for area regulation in California-demonstration results. Sandia National Laboratories, California, America, 2009.

  35. Energy storage report. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing, China, 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by National Key R&D Plan (2017YFB0903605), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51606185), International Partnership Program, Bureau of International Cooperation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (182211KYSB20170029), Science and Technology Plan Program of Guizhou Province ([2017]1163), Beijing Key Laboratory of Distributed Combined Cooling Heating and Power System.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haisheng Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, S., Liu, C., Ding, J. et al. Thermo-Economic Modeling and Evaluation of Physical Energy Storage in Power System. J. Therm. Sci. 30, 1861–1874 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1417-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1417-4

Keywords

Navigation