Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Injection Angles and Aperture Ratios on Film Cooling Performance of Sister Holes

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, to analyze the influences of the injection angles and aperture ratios (AR) of the primary hole and the side hole on the film cooling performance of a flat plate model, pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technology was used to study the forward and backward jet of a single hole and four sister holes, and a numerical simulation was supplemented to explore the flow structure of the sister holes. The sister holes had a better film cooling performance than the cylindrical hole at all blowing ratios (BR). The backward jet of the primary hole or the side hole could increase the spanwise film coverage of the sister hole. In this study, with the primary hole featuring a backward jet and the side hole featuring a forward jet, the film cooling performance was the best, 11.9 times higher than the areal mean film cooling efficiency of the cylindrical hole when AR=1 and BR=1.5. At a low blowing ratio, the counter-rotating vortex pair (CRVP) of the side hole could suppress the strength of the CRVP of the primary hole. At a high blowing ratio, when the primary hole featured a backward jet and the side hole featured a forward jet, the CRVP of the side hole had the optimal performance for suppressing the CRVP of the primary hole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AR:

Aperture ratio = D1/D2

BR:

Blowing ratio = ρcuc/ρu

C , C mix, \({C_\infty },{C_{{\rm{mix}}}},{C_{{{\rm{N}}_2}}}\) :

oxygen concentration

D, D 1, D 2 :

diameter of cylindrical hole primary hole or side hole/mm

DR:

density ratio 12

l 1 :

distance of the first point on the surface/mm

M c, M air :

molecular mass of molecules

\({P_{{{\rm{O}}_2},{\rm{air}}}}\), \({P_{{{\rm{O}}_2},{\rm{mix}}}}\) :

partial pressure of oxygen/Pa

u :

speed in the X-direction/m·s−1

X, Y, Z :

cartesian coordinate

y + :

normalized distance to the wall

α 1 :

the streamwise angle between the jet flow of primary hole and the primary flow/°

α 2 :

the streamwise angle between the jet flow of side hole and the primary flow/°

β 1 :

the spanwise angle between the jet flow of side hole and the primary flow/°

η :

\({\rm{film}}\,\,{\rm{cooling}}\,{\rm{effectiveness}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,{{{T_\infty } - {T_{{\rm{aw}}}}} \over {{T_\infty } - {T_c}}}\)

η ave :

\({\rm{average}}\,\,{\rm{spanwise}}\,{\rm{film}}\,{\rm{cooling efficiency}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,{1 \over n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{\eta _i}} \)

η area-ave :

\({\rm{area}}\,\,{\rm{mean}}\,{\rm{film}}\,{\rm{cooling}}\,{\rm{efficiency}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,{1 \over A}\int\!\!\!\int {{\eta _{xy}}{\rm{d}}A} \)

ω* :

vorticity

aw:

adiabatic wall

c:

coolant

mix:

mixture of gases

O2, air:

the amount of oxygen in the air

O2, mix:

The amount of oxygen in the mixture of gases

∞:

mainstream

ACRVP:

Anti-counter rotating vortex pair

BDSR:

Barchan-dune-shaped ramp

CCD:

Charge-coupled device

CRVP:

Counter-rotating vortex pair

LED:

Light emitting diode

PSP:

Pressure sensitive paint

References

  1. Greber I., Kamotani Y., Experiments on a turbulent jet in a cross flow. AIAA Journal, 1971, 32(5): 1451–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perry A.E., Kelso R.M., Lim T.T., Topological structure of a jet in a cross flow. Agard-cp-534-computational & Experimental Assessment of Jets in Cross Flow, Winchester, UK 1993, SEE N94-28003, pp. 1–7.

  3. Andreopoulos J., Heat transfer measurements in a heated jet-pipe flow issuing into a cold cross stream. The Physics of Fluids, 1983, 26(11): 3201–3210.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fric T.F., Roshko A., Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1994, 279(279): 1–17.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein R.J., Eckert E.R.G., Burggraf F., Effects of hole geometry and density on three-dimensional film cooling. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 1974, 17(5): 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bunker R.S., A review of shaped hole turbine film-cooling technology. Journal of Heat Transfer Transactions of the ASME, 2005, 127(4): 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kusterer K., Tekin N., Reiners F., et al., Highest-efficient film cooling by improved NEKOMIMI film cooling holes: Part 1 — Ambient air flow conditions. ASME. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Volume 3B: Heat Transfer, 2013, 55157: V03BT13A040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2013-95027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu Z., Zhu H., Liu C., et al., Investigation of the influence of inclination angle and diffusion angle on the film cooling performance of chevron shaped hole. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27(6): 580–591.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou W., Hui H., Improvements of film cooling effectiveness by using Barchan dune shaped ramps. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2016, 103: 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou W., Peng D., Wen X., et al., Unsteady analysis of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness behind circular, shaped, and sand-dune-inspired film cooling holes: Measurement using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2018, 125: 1003–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidmann J.D., Ekkad S., A novel anti-vortex turbine film cooling hole concept. ASME. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Volume 4: Turbo Expo 2007, Parts A and B, 2007, 47934: 487–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2007-27528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chi Z., Han C., Li X., et al., Geometrical optimization and experimental validation of a tripod film cooling hole with asymmetric side holes. ASME. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Volume 5B: Heat Transfer, 2014, (45721): V05BT13A005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2014-25211.

  13. Javadi A., Javadi K., Taeibi-Rahni M., Darbandi A., A new approach to improve film cooling effectiveness, using combined jets. Proceedings of the International Conference on Gas Turbine Congress 2003, Paper No., TS-071, Tokyo, Japan.

  14. Ely M., Jubran B.A., A numerical study on improving large angle film cooling performance through the use of sister holes. Numerical Heat Transfer, 2009, 55(7): 634–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ely M.J., Jubran B.A., A numerical evaluation on the effect of sister holes on film cooling effectiveness and the surrounding flow field. Heat & Mass Transfer, 2009, 45(11): 1435–1446.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khajehhasani S., Jubran B.A., Numerical assessment of the film cooling through novel sister-shaped single-hole schemes. Numerical Heat Transfer, 2015, 67(4): 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khajehhasani S., Jubran B.A., A numerical investigation of film cooling performance through variations in the location of discrete sister holes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 107: 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong W., Cheng H., Li Y., et al., Effects of side hole position and blowing ratio on sister hole film cooling performance in a flat plate. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 93: 718–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu R., Xie G., Simon T.W., New designs of novel holes based on cylindrical configurations for improving film cooling effectiveness. ASME. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Volume 5A: Heat Transfer, 2018, (51081): V05AT12A017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-76380.

  20. Bell J.H., Schairer E.T., Hand L.A., et al., Surface pressure measurements using luminescent coatings. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33(1): 155–206.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rallabandi A.P., Li S.J., Han J.C., Unsteady wake and coolant density effects on turbine blade film cooling using pressure sensitive paint technique. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2012, 134(8): 1529–1540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2010-22781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kline S.J., Describing uncertainty in single sample experiments. Mechanical Engineering, 1953, 75: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li J., Experimental and theoretical research on gas turbine film cooling. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li G., Yang P., Zhang W., et al., Enhanced film cooling performance of a row of cylindrical holes embedded in the saw tooth slot. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 132: 1137–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu C.L., Zhu H.R., Bai J.T., et al., Film cooling performance of converging-slot holes with different exit-entry area ratios. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 133(1): 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rundong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., He, Y., Li, R. et al. Effects of Injection Angles and Aperture Ratios on Film Cooling Performance of Sister Holes. J. Therm. Sci. 30, 716–728 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1315-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1315-1

Keywords

Navigation