Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gas Characteristics of Pine Sawdust Catalyzed Pyrolysis by Additives

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to effectively investigate the variation of gas production characteristics of biomass under normal-speed pyrolysis conditions, the gas production rate, gas production component yield and gas production calorific value of pine sawdust with adding Na2CO3, CaO and Fe2O3 were systematically analyzed. In the experiment, an improved tube furnace was used to research the pyrolysis process with the temperature from 350°C to 750°C. The results indicate that the gas yield rises with the increase of temperature without additives, reaching 19.59% at 750°C. The liquid yield reaches 59.38% at 450°C and then the yield change is small. CaO increases the calorific value of the pyrolysis product gas due to the adsorption of CO2. Na2CO3 is fused with inorganic substances in the biomass to form a char skeleton structure. The effect of Fe2O3 on H2 is more obvious at higher temperature. Na2CO3 has the most obvious effect on the pyrolysis of pine sawdust among the discussed additives, which effectively promotes the production of H2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bai Z., Liu Q., Gong L., et al., Investigation of a solar-biomass gasification system with the production of methanol and electricity: Thermodynamic, economic and off-design operation. Applied Energy, 2019, 243: 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Backreedy R.I., Fletcher L.M., Jones J.M., et al., Co-firing pulverised coal and biomass: a modeling approach. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30: 2955–2964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma L., Jones J.M., Pourkashanian M., et al., Modelling the combustion of pulverized biomass in an industrial combustion test furnace. Fuel, 2007, 86: 1959–1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Somers K.P., Curran H.J., Burke U., et al., The importance of endothermic pyrolysis reactions in the understanding of diesel spray combustion. Fuel, 2018, 224: 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gauthier G., Melkior T., Salvador S., et al., Pyrolysis of thick biomass particles: experimental and kinetic modelling. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2018, 32: 601–606.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohammed M., Salmiaton A., Azlina W., et al., Preparation and characterization of malaysian dolomites as a tar cracking catalyst in biomass gasification process. Journal of Energy, 2017, 15: 325–351.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartocci P., Anca-Couce A., Slopiecka K., et al., Pyrolysis of pellets made with biomass and glycerol: Kinetic analysis and evolved gas analysis. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2017, 97: 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaston K.R., Jarvis M.W., Pepiot P., et al., Biomass pyrolysis and gasification of varying particle sizes in a fluidized-bed reactor. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25: 3747–3757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai Z., Liu Q., Lei J., et al., A polygeneration system for the methanol production and the power generation with the solar-biomass thermal gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 102: 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams P.T., Nugranad N., et al., Comparison of products from the pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of rice husks. Energy, 2000, 25: 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson Y., Motuzas J., Julbe A., et al., Catalytic investigation of in situ generated Ni metal nanoparticles for tar conversion during biomass pyrolysis. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 117: 23812–23831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elkins T.W., Roberts S.J., Hagelin-Weaver H.E., et al., Effects of alkali and alkaline-earth metal dopants on magnesium oxide supported rare-earth oxide catalysts in the oxidative coupling of methane. Applied Catalysis A General, 2016, 528: 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guan G., Kaewpanha M., Hao X., et al., Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: prospects and challenges. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demirbas A., Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples. Fuel, 2001, 80: 1885–1891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen G., Andries J., Spliethoff H., Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for hydrogen rich fuel gas production. Energy Conversion & Management, 2003, 44: 2289–2296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deng W., Yu W., Su Y., Effects of CaO, ZnCl2 and water vapor on hydrogen rich gas formation during microwave pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Journal of Donghua University, 2014, 40: 624–632.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang T., Wang W., Catalytic pyrolysis of rice husks for syngas production over Fe-based catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2016, 38: 2190–2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han J., Kim H., The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12: 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun Y., Jiang J., Study on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Chemistry & Industry of Forest Products, 2007, 27: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang J., Jin C., Zhang J., et al., Study on industrial applied technology for biomass catalytic gasification. Chemistry & Industry of Forest Products, 2001, 21: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang J., Ying H., Dai W., et al., Study on the industry technology of catalytic gasification of biomass with a fluidizated bed. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2004, 25: 678–684.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang T., Chang J., Lv P., et al., Novel catalyst for cracking of biomass tar. Energy & Fuels, 2005, 19: 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang S., Luo Z., Pyrolysis of biomass components, Beijing, 2013.

  24. Fisher T., Hajaligol M., Waymack B., et al., Pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of biomass derived materials. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2002, 62: 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Avni E., Coughlin R.W., Solomon P.R., et al., Mathemayical-modeling of lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 1985, 64: 1495–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yun Y., Liu D., Wu H., Formation and characteristics of reaction intermediates from the fast pyrolysis of NaCl-and MgCl2-loaded celluloses. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 28: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fu Q., Argyropoulos D.S., Tilotta D.C., et al., Understanding the pyrolysis of CCA-treated wood: Part I. Effect of metal ions. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2008, 81: 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richards G.N., Zheng G., Influence of metal ions and of salts on products from pyrolysis of wood: Applications to thermochemical processing of newsprint and biomass. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 1991, 21: 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei L., Yang H., Li B., et al., Absorption-enhanced steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen production: Effect of calcium oxide addition on steam gasification of pyrolytic volatiles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 15416–15423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang B., Dong J., Wang W., Research on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of peanut shell over Fe2O3 catalyst. Speciality Petrochemicals, 2017, 34: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dong L., Asadullah M., Zhang S., An advanced biomass gasification technology with integrated catalytic hot gas cleaning: Part I. Technology and initial experimental results in a lab-scale facility. Fuel, 2013, 108: 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Virginie M., Courson C., Kiennemann A., Toluene steam reforming as tar model molecule produced during biomass gasification with an iron/olivine catalyst. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 2010, 13: 1319–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamhankar S.S., Tsuchiya K., Riggs J.B., Catalytic cracking of benzene on iron oxide-silica: catalyst activity and reaction mechanism. Applied Catalysis, 1985, 16: 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Swierczynski D., Courson C., Bedel L., Oxidation reduction behavior of iron-bearing olivines (FexMg1-x)2SiO4 used as catalysts for biomass gasification. Cheminform, 2006, 18: 897–905.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nordgreen T., Liliedahl T., Sjostrom K., Metallic iron as a tar breakdown catalyst related to atmospheric, fluidised bed gasification of biomass. Fuel, 2006, 85: 689–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dong L., Asadullah M., Zhang S., An advanced biomass gasification technology with integrated catalytic hot gas cleaning. Fuel, 2013, 108: 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo D., Wu S., Liu B., Catalytic effects of NaOH and Na2CO3 additives on alkali lignin pyrolysis and gasification. Applied Energy, 2012, 95: 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma C., Xiao B., Chen Y., Experimental research on biomass gasification for hydrogen rich gas production. Journal of Combustion Science & Technology, 2007, 13: 461–467.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support by Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Natural Science Fund (2018MS05046) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51706111).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunji Pang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, D., Jin, G., Pang, Y. et al. Gas Characteristics of Pine Sawdust Catalyzed Pyrolysis by Additives. J. Therm. Sci. 30, 333–342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1244-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1244-z

Keywords

Navigation