Heat transfer enhancement in a parabolic trough solar receiver using longitudinal fins and nanofluids
Abstract
In this paper, we present a three dimensional numerical investigation of heat transfer in a parabolic trough collector receiver with longitudinal fins using different kinds of nanofluid, with an operational temperature of 573 K and nanoparticle concentration of 1% in volume. The outer surface of the absorber receives a non-uniform heat flux, which is obtained by using the Monte Carlo ray tracing technique. The numerical results are contrasted with empirical results available in the open literature. A significant improvement of heat transfer is derived when the Reynolds number varies in the range 2.57×104 ≤ Re ≤ 2.57×105, the tube-side Nusselt number increases from 1.3 to 1.8 times, also the metallic nanoparticles improve heat transfer greatly than other nanoparticles, combining both mechanisms provides better heat transfer and higher thermo-hydraulic performance.
Keywords
numerical study Monte Carlo ray trace parabolic trough collector heat transfer longitudinal fins nanofluidPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Kalogirou S. Solar energy engineering: processes and systems. First ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, Academic Press; 2009.Google Scholar
- [2]Aggrey Mwesigye, Tunde Bello-Ochende, Josua P. Meyer. Heat transfer and thermodynamic performance of a parabolic trough receiver with centrally placed perforated plate inserts. Applied Energy; 2014.Google Scholar
- [3]P. Wang, D.Y. Liu, C. Xuc. Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement in the receiver tube of direct steam generation with parabolic trough by inserting metal foams. Applied Energy 102 (2013), 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Xingwang Song, Guobo Dong, Fangyuan Gao, Xungang Diao, Liqing Zheng, Fuyun Zhou. A numerical study of parabolic trough receiver with nonuniform heat flux and helical screw-tape inserts. Energy; 2014.Google Scholar
- [5]Z.D. Cheng, Y.L. He, F.Q. Cui. Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement by unilateral longitudinal vortex generators inside parabolic trough solar receivers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (2012) 5631–5641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Choi S. In: Siginer DA, Wang HP, editors. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles in development and applications of non-Newtonian flows. New York: ASME; 1995. P. 99–105.Google Scholar
- [7]T. Sokhansefat, A.B. Kasaeian, F. Kowsary. Heat transfer enhancement in parabolic trough collector tube using Al2O3/synthetic oil nanofluid; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33(2014), 636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]Risi Ad, Milanese M, Laforgia D. Modelling and optimization of transparent parabolic trough collector based on gas-phase nanofluids. Renewable Energy; 2013; 58: 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]D.C. Wilcox, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc., La Cañada, California, 1998.Google Scholar
- [10]ANSYS Academic research, release 14.5, ANSYS FLUENT user’s guide, ANSYS Inc.Google Scholar
- [11]Richard L. Moore. Implementation of DOWTHERM A Properties into RELALP5-3D/ATHENA; Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls (Idaho), 2010Google Scholar
- [12]NREL. SolTrace optical modeling software. SolTrace 2012; 2012.7.9; 2012.Google Scholar
- [13]Pandey DK, Lee III RB, Paden J. Effects of atmospheric emissivity on clear sky temperatures. Atmos Environ 1994; 29(16): 2201e4.Google Scholar
- [14]García-Valladares O, Velázquez N. Numerical simulation of parabolic trough solar collector: improvement using counter flow concentric circular heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2009; 52: 597–609.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [15]Mullick SC, Nanda SK. An improved technique for computing the heat loss factor of a tubular absorber. Sol Energy 1989; 42: 1–7.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]Petukhov BS. In: Irvine TF, Hartnett JP, editors. Heat transfer and friction in turbulent pipe flow with variable physical properties. Advance in heat transfer, vol. 6; 1970. p. 503–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]Incropera F, Dewitt D. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1990. p. 490.Google Scholar
- [18]Gnielinski V. New equations for heat and mass-transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow. Int J Chem Eng 1976; 16(2): 359e68.Google Scholar
- [19]R.H. Notter, M.W. Rouse, A solution to the Graetz problem-III. Fully developed region heat transfer rates, Chemical Engineering Science, 27 (1972), 2073–2093.Google Scholar
- [20]A. A. Abbasian Arani, J. Amani, Experimental study on the effect of TiO2–water nanofluid on heat transfer and pressure drop, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 42 (2012), 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]Manglik R.M. and Bergles A.E, Heat transfer and pressure drop relation for twisted tape inserts in Isothermal tube, Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol.116, pp. 881–889, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]B.C. Pak, Y.I. Cho, Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles, Experimental Heat Transfer 11 (1998), 151.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]D. Wen, Y. Ding, Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluid at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 47 (2004), 5181–5188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]H. Brinkman, The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 20 (1952), 571.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]J.C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, vol. 1, Clarendon Press, 1881Google Scholar