Journal of Thermal Science

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 32–42 | Cite as

Combined experimental and numerical investigations on the roughness effects on the aerodynamic performances of LPT blades

  • Marco Berrino
  • Fabio Bigoni
  • Daniele Simoni
  • Matteo Giovannini
  • Michele Marconcini
  • Roberto Pacciani
  • Francesco Bertini


The aerodynamic performance of a high-load low-pressure turbine blade cascade has been analyzed for three different distributed surface roughness levels (Ra) for steady and unsteady inflows. Results from CFD simulations and experiments are presented for two different Reynolds numbers (300000 and 70000 representative of take-off and cruise conditions, respectively) in order to evaluate the roughness effects for two typical operating conditions.

Computational fluid dynamics has been used to support and interpret experimental results, analyzing in detail the flow field on the blade surface and evaluating the non-dimensional local roughness parameters, further contributing to understand how and where roughness have some influence on the aerodynamic performance of the blade. The total pressure distributions in the wake region have been measured by means of a five-hole miniaturized pressure probe for the different flow conditions, allowing the evaluation of profile losses and of their dependence on the surface finish, as well as a direct comparison with the simulations.

Results reported in the paper clearly highlight that only at the highest Reynolds number tested (Re=300000) surface roughness have some influence on the blade performance, both for steady and unsteady incoming flows. In this flow condition profile losses grow as the surface roughness increases, while no appreciable variations have been found at the lowest Reynolds number. The boundary layer evolution and the wake structure have shown that this trend is due to a thickening of the suction side boundary layer associated to an anticipation of transition process. On the other side, no effects have been observed on the pressure side boundary layer.


low-pressure turbine high-load profile roughness unsteady inflow CFD 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    J. Nikuradse. Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes. VDI-Forchungsheft 361, Series B, Vol. 4, 1933. (NACA TM 1292).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. A. Flack and M. P. Schultz. Review of Hydraulic Roughness Scales in the Fully Rough Regime. ASME J. Fluid Eng., 132(4): 041203, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. L. Braslow. Review of the Effect of Distributed Surface Roughness on Boundary-Layer Transition. AGARDR-254, 1960.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. P. Hodson, R. J. Howell. The Role of Transition in High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbines for Aeroengines. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 41(6): 419–454, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Vázquez and D. Torre, The Effect of Surface Roughness on Efficiency of Low Pressure Turbines. ASME Paper No.GT2013-94200, ASME Turbo Expo, June 3–7, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Vera, X. F. Zhang, H. P. Hodson, N. Harvey. Separation and Transition Control on an Aft-Loaded Ultra-High-Lift LP Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers: High- Speed Validation. ASME J. Turbomach., 129(2): 340–347, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. J. Boyle and R. G. Senyitko, Measurements and Predictions of Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Vane Aerodynamics. ASME Paper No.GT2003-38580, ASME Turbo Expo, June 16-19, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    B. Aupoix, P. R. Spalart. Extensions of the Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model to Account for Wall Roughness. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 24: 454–462, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Aupoix. Roughness Corrections for the k-ω Shear Stress Transport Model: Status and Proposal. J. Fluid Eng., 137(2): 021202, 2015.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    V. Nagabhushana Rao, R. Jefferson-Loveday, P. G. Tucker, S. Lardeau. Large Eddy Simulations in Turbines: Influence of Roughness and Free-Stream Turbulence. Flow Turbulence Combust., 92: 543–561, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Bellucci, F. Rubechini, M. Marconcini, A. Arnone, L. Arcangeli, N. Maceli, V. Dossena, The Influence of Roughness on a High-Pressure Steam Turbine Stage: An Experimental and Numerical Study. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 137(1): 012602, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. P. Bons, A Review of Surface Roughness Effects in Gas Turbines. ASME J. Turbomach., 132(2): 021004, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. Satta, D. Simoni, M. Ubaldi, P. Zunino, F. Bertini. Experimental Investigation of Separation and Transition Processes on a High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Profile Under Steady and Unsteady Inflow at Low Reynolds Number. J. Therm. Sci., 19(1): 26–33, 2010.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. Montomoli, H. P. Hodson, F. Haselbach. Effect of Roughness and Unsteadiness on the Performance of a New Low Pressure Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers. ASME J. Turbomach., 132(3): 031018, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Marconcini, F. Rubechini, R. Pacciani, A. Arnone, F. Bertini. Redesign of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils For Low Speed Testing. ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5): 051017, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    F. Satta, D. Simoni, M. Ubaldi, P. Zunino, F. Bertini. Loading Distribution Effects on Separated Flow Transition of Ultra-High-Lift Turbine Blades. J. Propul. Power, 30(3): 845: 856, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Simoni, M. Berrino, M. Ubaldi, P. Zunino, F. Bertini. Off-Design Performance of a Highly Loaded LP Turbine Cascade Under Steady and Unsteady Incoming Flow Conditions. ASME J. Turbomach., 137 (7): 071009, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Arnone. Viscous Analysis of Three–Dimensional Rotor Flow Using a Multigrid Method. ASME J. Turbomach., 116(3): 435–445, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. J. Chorin. A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems. J. Comput. Phys., 2: 12–26, 1967.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. C. Wilcox. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 2nd ed., DCW Industries, Inc., La Cañada, ISBN 1-928729-10-X, 1998.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. E. Mayle and A. Schultz. The Path to Predicting Bypass Transition. ASME J. Turbomach., 119(3): 405–411, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    D. C. Wilcox. Formulation of the k-ω Turbulence Model Revisited. AIAA J., 46(11): 2823–2838, 2008.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. Pacciani, M. Marconcini, A. Fadai-Ghotbi, S. Lardeau, M. A. Leschziner. Calculation of High-Lift Cascades in Low Pressure Turbine Conditions Using a Three-Equation Model. ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3): 031016, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Schlichting. Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th ed., Mc-Graw-Hill Inc., New York, ISBN 0-07-055334-3, 1979.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. Schäffler, Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Effects of Reynolds Number and Blade Surface Roughness on Multistage Axial Flow Compressors. ASME J. Eng. Power, 102(1): 5–13, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    T. Adams, C. Grant, H. Watson. A Simple Algorithm to Relate Measured Surface Roughness to Equivalent Sand-Grain Roughness. Int. J. Mech. Eng. and Mechatronics, 1(1): 008, 2012.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    D. Lengani, D. Simoni. Recognition of Coherent Structures in the Boundary Layer of a Low-Pressure-Turbine Blade for Different Free-Stream Turbulence Intensity Levels. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 54: 1–13, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Q. Zhang and P. M. Ligrani. Aerodynamic Losses of a Cambered Turbine Vane: Influences of Surface Roughness and Freestream Turbulence Intensity. ASME J. Turbomach., 128(3): 536–546, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    E. G. Feindt. Untersuchungen über die Abhängigkeit des Umshclages laminar-turbulent von der Oberflächenrauhigkeit und der Druckverteilung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1956.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Marconcini, R. Pacciani, A. Arnone, F. Bertini. Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade Performance Calculations with Incidence Variation and Periodic Unsteady Inflow Conditions. ASME paper No. GT2015-42276, ASME Turbo Expo, June 15–19, Montréal, Canada, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Berrino
    • 1
  • Fabio Bigoni
    • 1
  • Daniele Simoni
    • 1
  • Matteo Giovannini
    • 2
  • Michele Marconcini
    • 2
  • Roberto Pacciani
    • 2
  • Francesco Bertini
    • 3
  1. 1.DIMEUniversitá di GenovaGenovaItaly
  2. 2.DIEFUniversitá di FirenzeFirenzeItaly
  3. 3.GE Avio R&DRivalta (TO)Italy

Personalised recommendations