Skip to main content
Log in

Field experiments on quantifying the contributions of Coreopsis canopies and roots to controlling runoff and erosion on steep loess slopes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grass recovery is often implemented in the loess area of China to control erosion. However, the effect mechanisms of grass cover on runoff erosion dynamics on steep loess hillslopes is still not clear. Taking the typical forage species (Coreopsis) in semiarid areas as subject, this study quantified the effects of canopies and roots on controlling slope runoff and erosion. A series of field experiments were conducted in a loess hilly region of China. Field plots (5 m length, 2 m width, 25° slope gradient) constructed with three ground covers (bare soil; Coreopsis with intact grass; only roots of Coreopsis), were applied with simultaneous simulated rainfall (60 mm h1) and upslope inflow (10, 30, 50, 70, 90 L min1). The results showed that compared with bare soil, intact grass significantly reduced runoff and soil loss rates by 16.6% and 62.4% on average, and decreased soil erodibility parameter by 66.3%. As inflow rate increased, the reductions in runoff and soil loss rates increased from 2.93 to 14.00 L min1 and 35.11 to 121.96 g m2 min1, respectively. Canopies relatively contributed 66.7% to lowering flow velocity, turbulence, weakening erosive force and increasing hydraulic resistance. Roots played a predominant role in reducing soil loss and enhancing soil anti-erodibility, with relative contributions of 78.8% and 73.8%. Furthermore, the maximum erosion depth reduced by Coreopsis was at the upper slope section which was previously eroded the most. These results demonstrated the efficiency of Coreopsis cover in controlling runoff and erosion on steep loess slopes, especially under large inflow rates and at upper slope sections. We suggest protecting Coreopsis with intact grass at upper slope sections, while the aboveground grass biomass can be used for grazing or harvesting at middle and lower slope sections, with roots reserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BS:

Bare soil

GS:

Soil covered with the intact grass of Coreopsis

RS:

Soil covered with the roots of Coreopsis

RI:

Rainfall intensity, mm h1

IR:

Upslope inflow rate, L min1

RR:

Mean runoff rate during the sampling period, L min1

SLR:

Mean soil loss rate during the sampling period, g m2 min1

F :

Mean soil infiltration rate during the sampling period, mm h1

V :

Average flow velocity in water cross section, m s1

h :

Average runoff depth, m

Re:

Reynolds number

Fr:

Froude number

f :

Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient

τ :

Flow shear stress, N m2

ω :

Stream power of slope flow, N m1 s1

φ :

Unit stream power, m s1

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41907061), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei province, China (2021CFB550), and the joint fund for regional innovation and development of NSFC (U21A2039).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei Tian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, Yw., Yu, Hj., Tian, P. et al. Field experiments on quantifying the contributions of Coreopsis canopies and roots to controlling runoff and erosion on steep loess slopes. J. Mt. Sci. 20, 1402–1423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7775-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7775-x

Keywords

Navigation