Abstract
Smallholder livelihoods in agricultural areas in Tibet Autonomous Region, China (Tibet for short) have traditionally been based on subsistence mixed crop-livestock systems. Like many parts of China and the developing world, rural Tibet is undergoing rapid change in agricultural development, boosted by links with the off-farm sector. However, the agricultural transition process in Tibet has not been linear, is affected by policies particular to the region, and varies significantly for different categories of rural actors. This paper analyses heterogeneity of household types in agricultural areas of southern Tibet and how household structures and characteristics result in different agricultural development pathways. Data is drawn from a stratified random survey of 144 households in three townships in southern Tibet and analysed through three methods: cluster analysis, bio-economic modelling, and analysis of household perceptions and attitudes to change. The analysis allows for the identification of three key household types — semi-subsistence, pluriactive and semi-commercial — organised along a continuum of intensification, commercialisation, specialisation and productivity. The study demonstrates the diversity of household farming systems in Tibet which in turn highlights the need for disaggregated analysis and tailored development policies and strategies. However, the analysis also reveals commonalities in development paths between groups, where all farm types are more interested in pursuing income and livelihood goals through an increase in productivity than through an increase in scale. Farmers in all systems choose to retain agriculture as a base from which to pursue livelihood strategies, especially through off-farm activities. Accounting for this household heterogeneity is important on several levels. First, it provides more granular detail on the process of development in rural areas of Tibet that have been very difficult to access in English literature especially in recent years. Second, the characteristics of the case study in agricultural areas of Tibet — especially the mixed agricultural-pastoral systems, high levels of seasonality, heavy state investment and increased integration with the other regions of China — may contribute to the broader agricultural development study. Third, policymakers in the central and local governments may be interested in how the household heterogeneity may affect — or be affected by — policies to increase agricultural productivity, intensify systems, change the composition of crop-livestock systems, promote rural-urban transformation and pursue environmental objectives, especially grassland degradation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Addison J, Brown CG, Lkhagvadorj EO, et al. (2020) Institutions and macrodevelopments. In: Brown CG (ed.), Common Grasslands in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Mongolian Grasslands. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp 12–47. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974059.00009
Alkarkhi AFM, Alqaraghuli WAA (2019) Easy Statistics for Food Science with R (1 ed.). UK: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814262-2.00011-X
Bai W, Zhang Y, Xie G, Shen Z (2002) Analysis of formation causes of grassland degradation in Maduo County in the source region of Yellow River. Chin J Appl Ecol 13(7): 823–826. (In Chinese)
Berton M, Bittante G, Zendri F, et al. (2020) Environmental impact and efficiency of use of resources of different mountain dairy farming systems. Agric Syst 181: 102806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102806
Brown CG, Waldron SA (2011) Role of agriculture in the livelihoods of farm households in Tibet (No. 422–2016-26932). The 55th Annual Conference of Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES), 8–11 February 2011, Melbourne. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.100729
Brown CG, Waldron SA (2013) Agrarian change, agricultural modernization and the modelling of agricultural households in Tibet. Agric Syst 115: 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.008
Brown CG, Yadav LP, Zhang J, Zhuoga D (2019) Sustainability of Agricultural Diversity in the Farm Households of Southern Tibet. Sustainability 11(20): 5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205756
Brown C, Zhang J, Zhuoga D, et al. (2021) Market integration and agricultural development: The case of Tibet’s ruminant livestock industries. Agribusiness 37(4): 818–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21696
CAHVY (China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Yearbook Editorial Committee) (2018) China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Yearbook. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)
Cao J, Adamowski JF, Deo RC, et al. (2019) Grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: reevaluation of causative factors. Rangel Ecol Manag 72(6): 988–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.06.001
China Statistical Bureau (2020) China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)
Clavel L, Soudais J, Baudet D, Leenhardt D (2011) Integrating expert knowledge and quantitative information for mapping cropping systems. Land Use Policy 28(1): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.001
Devendra C, Thomas D (2002) Crop—animal systems in Asia: importance of livestock and characterisation of agro-ecological zones. Agric Syst 71(1–2): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00032-4
Dorward A, Anderson S, Bernal YN, et al. (2009) Hanging in, stepping up and stepping out: livelihood aspirations and strategies of the poor. Dev Pract 19(2): 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802689535
Fan XJ (2007) Tibet: Research on Methods to Grow Agricultural and Livestock Industries. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)
Fayiah M, Dong S, Khomera SW, et al. (2020) Status and challenges of Qinghai—Tibet Plateau’s grasslands: an analysis of causes, mitigation measures, and way forward. Sustainability 12(3): 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031099
Fischer AM (2008) “Population invasion” versus urban exclusion in the Tibetan areas of western China. Popul Dev Rev 34(4): 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00244.x
Gautam Y, Andersen P (2016) Rural livelihood diversification and household well-being: Insights from Humla, Nepal. J Rural Stud 44: 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.001
Goldstein MC, Childs G, Wangdui P (2008) “Going for Income” in Village Tibet: a longitudinal analysis of change and adaptation, 1997–2007. Asian Surv 48(3): 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2008.48.3.514
Gongbuzeren, Huntsinger L, Li W (2018) Rebuilding pastoral social-ecological resilience on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in response to changes in policy, economics, and climate. Ecol Soc 23(2):21. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10096-230221
Hardiman RT, Lacey R, Yi YM (1990) Use of cluster analysis for identification and classification of farming systems in Qingyang County, Central North China. Agric Syst 33(2): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(90)90075-2
Harris RB (2010) Rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: a review of the evidence of its magnitude and causes. J Arid Environ 74(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.06.014
Hua X, Yan J, Zhang Y (2017) Evaluating the role of livelihood assets in suitable livelihood strategies: Protocol for anti-poverty policy in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Ecol Indic 78:62–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.009
Huang JK, Rozelle S (2018) China’s 40 years of agricultural development and reform. In: Garnaut R, Song LG, Fang C (eds.), China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development: 1978–2018. Canberra: ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CYRD.07.2018
Kimhi A, Nachlieli N (2001) Intergenerational succession on Israeli family farms. J Agric Econ 52(2): 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00924.x
Komarek AM, Bell LW, Whish JP, et al. (2015) Whole-farm economic, risk and resource-use trade-offs associated with integrating forages into crop—livestock systems in western China. Agric Syst 133: 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.10.008
Kreutzmann H (eds.) (2012) Pastoral Practices in High Asia: Agency of Development Effected by Modernisation, Resettlement and Transformation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3846-1
Kreutzmann H, Yang Y, Richter J (eds.) (2011) Pastoralism and Rangeland Management on the Tibetan Plateau in the Context of Climate and Global Change. Regional Workshop in Lhasa, P.R. China, 21–25 October 2010. Available at: https://www.geo.fuberlin.de/geog/fachrichtungen/anthrogeog/zelf/Medien/download/Kreutzmann_PDFs/pdfs_Nov_2012/GIZ2011_Tibet-pastoralism-management.pdf (access on 25 Jan 2022).
Kuchimanchi BR, van Paassen A, Oosting SJ (2021) Understanding the vulnerability, farming strategies and development pathways of smallholder farming systems in Telangana, India. Clim Risk Manag 31: 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100275
Kuivanen KS, Michalscheck M, Descheemaeker K, et al. (2016) A comparison of statistical and participatory clustering of smallholder farming systems—A case study in Northern Ghana. J Rural Stud 45: 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.015
Li XZ, Yan CG, Zan LS (2018) Current situation and future prospects for beef production in China—A review. Asian-australas J Anim Sci 31(7): 984–991. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0212
Liu W, Shankar S, Li L (2021) Is specialization a strategy to improve farm efficiency in northwest China?. Rev Dev Econ 25: 1695–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12782
Mądry W, Mena Guerrero Y, Roszkowska-Madra B, et al. (2013) An overview of farming system typology methodologies and its use in the study of pasture-based farming system: a review. Span J Agric Res 11(2): 316–326. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3295
Malakar KD, Santra A (2020) Impacts of climate change on pastoral system: A study on Tibetan Plateau, world’s third pole. Aegaeum 8(6): 633–653. Available at http://aegaeum.com/gallery/agm.j-3284.69-f.pdf (access on 25 Jan 2022)
Morris W, Henley A, Dowell D (2017) Farm diversification, entrepreneurship and technology adoption: Analysis of upland farmers in Wales. J Rural Stud 53: 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.014
Nolan S, Unkovich M, Shen Y, et al. (2008) Farming systems of the Loess Plateau, Gansu Province, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124(1–2): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.009
Paltridge N, Tao J, Unkovich M, et al. (2009) Agriculture in central Tibet: an assessment of climate, farming systems, and strategies to boost production. Crop Pasture Sci 60(7): 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08372
Raghuvanshi MS, Dorjay N, Singh RK, et al. (2019) Ladakh Traditional Farming: An Approach to Resource Utilization under Changing Climate. Int J Curr. Microbiol Appl Sci 8(9): 654–666. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.079
Rigg J (2005) Poverty and livelihoods after full-time farming: A South-East Asian view. Asia Pac Viewp 46(2): 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2005.00266.x
Riveiro JA, Mantecón AR, Álvarez CJ, Lavín P (2013) A typological characterization of dairy Assaf breed sheep farms at NW of Spain based on structural factor. Agric Syst 120: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.05.004
Shahzad MA, Ahmed V, Fischer C (2021) Status and determinants of other gainful activities by farmers in mountainous rural regions of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. J Mt Sci 18(10): 2520–2539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-6673-y
Sheehy DP, Miller D, Johnson DA (2006) Transformation of traditional pastoral livestock systems on the Tibetan steppe. Science et changements planétaires/Sécheresse 17(1): 142–151. Available at https://doi.org/10.1.1.855.9510&rep=rep1&type=pdf (access on 25 Jan 2022)
State Council (2006) Some proposals for resolving the problems for migrant workers. State Council Document No. 5, 31 January. In Chinese). Available at http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_244909.htm (accessed on 5 September 2021
State Council (2016a) Opinions about integrating the basic health insurance systems of urban and rural residents from the State Council. State Council Document No. 5, 3 January. Available at http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-01/12/content_10582.htm (accessed on 5 September 2021, In Chinese).
State Council (2016b) Announcement from General Office of State Council about publishing the plan of promoting 100 million non-hukou population to obtain hukou in cities. State Council Document No. 72, 30 September. Available at http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-10/11/content_5117442.htm (accessed on 5 September 2021, In Chinese).
Tibet Daily (2021) Tibet transferred 610,000 rural labors and generated 4.71 billion yuan in employment income. Available at http://www.xizang.gov.cn/zmhd/hygq/202104/t20210401_198103.html (accessed on 22 September 2021, In Chinese).
Tibet Government (2019) Tibet action plan for rural labor transfer and employment training in 2019–2020. Available at http://www.xizang.gov.cn/zwgk/zfgb/2019gb/202004/P020200421368763346939.pdf (accessed on 11 September 2021, In Chinese).
Tibet Statistical Bureau (2020) Tibet Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)
Usai MG, Casu S, Molle G, et al. (2006) Using cluster analysis to characterize the goat farming system in Sardinia. Livest Sci 104(1–2): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.03.013
Waldron S, Brown C, Jin T, Na W (2016) Agricultural development in a Tibetan township. Himalaya 35 (2): Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol35/iss2/7
Waldron S, Brown C, Longworth J (2010) Grassland degradation and livelihoods in China’s western pastoral region: A framework for understanding and refining China’s recent policy responses. China Agric Econ Rev 2(3): 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561371011078435
Wang X, Yamauchi F, Huang J (2016) Rising wages, mechanization, and the substitution between capital and labor: evidence from small scale farm system in China. Agric Econ 47(3): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12231
Weltin M, Zasada I, Franke C, et al. (2017) Analysing behavioural differences of farm households: An example of income diversification strategies based on European farm survey data. Land use policy 62: 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.041
World Bank (2007) World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5990
Wu S, Feng X, Kong L, et al. (2021) Effects of climate variation and human activities on grassland degradation in Tibet. Geogr Res 40: 1265–1279. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020200594
Yang QY, Zheng D (eds.) (2004) Tibetan geography: Series of Basic Information of Tibet of China. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
Zhang J, Brown C, Qiao G, Zhang B (2019) Effect of eco-compensation schemes on household income structures and herder satisfaction: lessons from the grassland Ecosystem Subsidy and Award Scheme in Inner Mongolia. Ecol Econ 159: 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.006
Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yan J, Wu Y (2008) Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci 18: 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-008-0499-1
Zhao YN, Fan J, Wang YF, et al. (2021) Income inequality and growth from functional orientation and spatial policy: Case study of Tibet, China. J Mt Sci 18(1): 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5541-5
Zhen C (2007) Animal husbandry will become the leading industry of Tibet’s rural economy. [Online] 25th February. Available at http://www.xizang.gov.cn/xwzx_406/bmkx/201812/t20181216_8041.html (accessed on 5 September 2021, In Chinese).
Acknowledgements
This paper was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR LPS-2014-036). The authors would like to acknowledge the insights from project scientists in the Tibet Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences and two anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions helped improve and clarify this manuscript, as well as thank the participants of these surveys and interviews.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Brown, C., Waldron, S. et al. Heterogeneity in agricultural households and transition paths in southern Tibet. J. Mt. Sci. 19, 1386–1403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7154-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7154-z