Abstract
Critical transitions in ecosystems may imply risks of unexpected collapse under climate changes, especially vegetation often responds sensitively to climate change. The type of vegetation ecosystem states could present alternative stable states, and its type could signal the critical transitions at tipping points because of changed climate or other drivers. This study analyzed the distribution of four key vegetation ecosystem types: desert, grassland, forest-steppe ecotone and forest, in Tibetan Plateau in China, using the latent class analysis method based on remote sensing data and climate data. This study analyzed the impacts of three key climate factors, precipitation, temperature, and sunshine duration, on the vegetation states, and calculated the critical transition tipping point of potential changes in vegetation type in Tibetan Plateau with the logistic regression model. The studied results showed that climatic factors greatly affect the vegetation states and vulnerability of the Tibetan Plateau. In comparison with temperature and sunshine duration, precipitation shows more obvious impact on differentiations of the vegetations status probability. The precipitation tipping point for desert and grassland transition is averagely 48.0 mm/month, 70.7 mm/month for grassland and forest-steppe ecotone, and 115.0 mm/month for forest-steppe ecotone and forest. Both temperature and sunshine duration only show different probability change between vegetation and non-vegetation type, but produce opposite impacts. In Tibetan Plateau, the transition tipping points of vegetation and non-vegetation are about 12.1°C/month and 173.6 h/month for the temperature and sunshine duration, respectively. Further, vulnerability maps calculated with the logistic regression results presented the distribution of vulnerability of Tibetan Plateau key ecosystems. The vulnerability of the typical ecosystems in the Tibetan Plateau is low in the southeast and is high in the northwest. The meteorological factors affect tree cover as well as the transition probability that occurs in different vegetation states. This study can provide reference for local government agencies to formulate regional development strategies and environmental protection laws and regulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environ. Change 16: 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Berrouet LM, Machado J, Villegas-Palacio C (2018) Vulnerability of socio—ecological systems: A conceptual Framework. Ecol Indic 84: 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.051
Beccair B (2016) A Comparative analysis of disaster risk, vulnerability and resilience composite indicators. PLoS Currents. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970
Bryan N (1992) Sustainability, human welfare and ecosystem health. Environ Values https://doi.org/10.2307/30301269
Burra DD, Pretty J, Neuenschwander P, et al. (2021) Human health outcomes of a restored ecological balance in African agro-landscapes, Sci Total Environ 775: 145872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145872
Campos CPD, Scanagatta M, Corani G, et al. (2018) Entropy-based Pruning for Learning Bayesian Networks using BIC. Artif Intelligence 260: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.04.002
Chakrabarti A, Ghosh JK (2011) AIC, BIC and Recent Advances in Model Selection. Philosophy of Statistics 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-51862-0.50018-6
Duan Z, Bastiaanssen WGM (2013) First results from Version 7 TRMM 3B43 precipitation product in combination with a new downscaling-calibration procedure. Remote Sensing Environ 131: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.002
Duan Z, Bastiaanssen WGM, Liu JZ (2012) Monthly and annual validation of TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) products in the Caspian Sea Region for the period 1999–2003. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Munich, Germany, July 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2012.6350613
Eisavi V, Homayouni S, Yazdi AM, et al. (2015) Land cover mapping based on random forest classification of multitemporal spectral and thermal images. Environ Monit Assess 187: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4489-3
Ferrara A, Salvati L, Sateriano A, et al. (2012) Performance evaluation and cost assessment of a key indicator system to monitor desertification vulnerability. Ecol Indic 23(5): 123–129.
Ficetola FG, Denoel M (2009) Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species habitat relationships. Ecography 32: 1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05571.x
Gey S, Nedelec E (2005) Model selection for CART regression trees. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 51: 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2004.840903
Gotts NM, Voorn GAK, Polhill JG, et al. (2018) Agent-based modelling of socio-ecological systems: Models, projects and ontologies. Ecological Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.07.007
Groffman PM (2006) Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0142-z
Grohmann CH (2018) Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. Remote Sensing Environ 212: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043
Guo B, Zang WQ, Yang F, et al. (2020) Spatial and temporal change patterns of net primary productivity and its response to climate change in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China from 2000 to 2015. J Arid Land 12(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0070-1
Gupta AK, Pardo L (2007) Phi-divergences and polytomous logistic regression models: An overview. J Stat Planning Inference 137: 3513–3524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.028
Hirota M, Holmgren M, Van Nes EH, et al. (2011) Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Sci 334: 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210657
Huggett AJ (2005) The concept and utility of “ecological thresholds” in biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 124: 301–310.
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415379
Ishtiaque A, Myint SW, Wang C (2016) Examining the ecosystem health and sustainability of the world’s largest mangrove forest using multi-temporal MODIS products. Sci Total Environ 569–570: 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.200
Jing WL, Yang YY, Yue XF (2016) A spatial downscaling algorithm for satellite-based precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau based on NDVI, DEM, and Land Surface Temperature. Remote Sens 8: 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8080655
Johnston RJ (2018) “Ecosystem services”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 5 Jan. 2018, https://www.britannica.com/science/ecosystem-services
Johnston ASA, Meade A, Ardö J. et al. (2021) Temperature thresholds of ecosystem respiration at a global scale. Nat Ecol Evol 5: 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01398-z
Katiraie-Boroujerdy PS, Asanjan AA, Hsu KL, et al. (2017) Intercomparison of PERSIANN-CDR and TRMM-3B42V7 precipitation estimates at monthly and daily time scales. Atmos Res 197: 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.005
Kelley OA (2013) Adapting an existing visualization application for browser-based deployment: A case study from the Tropical Precipitation Measuring Mission. Comput Geosci 51: 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.10.004
Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acostamichlik L, et al. (2006) The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(1): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025
Motrenko A, Strijov V, Weber GW (2014) Sample size determination for logistic regression. J Comput Appl Math 255: 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.06.031
Orea L, Kumbhakar SC (2004) Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model. Empiri Econ 29: 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-003-0184-2
Polo-Akpisso A, Wala K, Foléga F, et al. (2015) Trade-off between biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptive strategies and landscape patterns within three districts in northern Togo (West Africa). International Conference on Biodiversity, 2015/06/15, Las Vegas, USA. https://10times.com/biodiversity-sustainable-energydevelopment
Qian SS (2014) Ecological threshold and environmental management: A note on statistical methods for detecting thresholds. Ecol. Indicators. 38, 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.008
Sasaki T, Furukawa T, Iwasaki Y, et al. (2015) Perspectives for ecosystem management based on ecosystem resilience and ecological thresholds against multiple and stochastic disturbances. Ecol Indic 57: 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.019
Scheffer M (2009) Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2009. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691122045/critical-transitions-in-nature-and-society
Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Lenton TM, et al. (2012) Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338: 1029. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225244
Serna-Chavez HM, Schulp CJE, van Bodegom PM, et al. (2014) A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 39: 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
Smith AMS, Kolden CA, Tinkham WT, et al. (2014) Remote sensing the vulnerability of vegetation in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 154: 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.03.038
Staver AC, Archibald S, Levin SA (2011) The global extent and determinants of savanna and forest as alternative biome states. Science 334: 230–232. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210465
Stoklosa J, Huang YH, Furlan E, et al. (2016) On quadratic logistic regression models when predictor variables are subject to measurement error. Comput Stat Data Anal 95: 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2015.09.012
Sun LY, Miao CL, Yang L (2018) Ecological environmental early-warning model for strategic emerging industries in China based on logistic regression. Ecol Indic 84: 748–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.036
Uehara T (2013) Ecological threshold and ecological economic threshold: Implications from an ecological economic model with adaptation. Ecol Economics 93: 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.014
Wang XD, Zhong XH, Liu SZ, et al. (2008) Regional assessment of environmental vulnerability in the Tibetan plateau: development and application of a new method. J Arid Environ 72(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.005
Weingessel A (2012) Latent class analysis. Acta Archaeologica 82: 258–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0390.2011.00486.x
Yang F, Ma C, Fang HJ (2019) Research progress on vulnerability: from theoretical research to comprehensive practice. Acta Ecologica Sinica 39(2): 441–453. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201802020289 (In Chinese with English Abstract)
Yin C, Yang F, Wang JL (2020) Analogs of future climate in chinese cities identified in present observations. IEEE Access 8: 219151–219159. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042548
Yin C, Yang F (2021) Variation of extreme climate events in “One Belt and One Road” region and its impact on the growing season in typical agricultural regions. Chinese J Agrometeorol 42(6): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2021.06.002 (In Chinese with English Abstract)
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0604804), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA20020402), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 42171079). The authors wish to thank the National Earth System Science Data Center (www.geodata.cn) for supporting the MODIS data, and thank anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions have helped greatly improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, F., Ma, C. & Fang, Hj. Simulation of critical transitions and vulnerability assessment of Tibetan Plateau key ecosystems. J. Mt. Sci. 19, 673–688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-6960-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-6960-7