Abstract
Numerous shallow earthquakes, including 24th August Amatrice, 26th October Visso, and 30th October Norcia earthquakes, ruptured the segments of Mount Vettore-Gorzano fault system in the central Apennines (Italy) in 2016. In order to investigate the stress perturbation and triggering patterns among the earthquake sequences, we introduce a more realistic nonplanar coseismic fault geometry model, which improve the rupture model by assimilating relocated aftershocks and the GPS observations. We adopt the seismic slip inversion program of the steepest descent method (SDM) to create the detailed coseismic rupture models and optimize Coulomb Failure Stress model by varying the coefficient of friction and received fault parameters. The results indicate that the nonplanar fault geometry model is more reflective of the deep slip of the coseismic rupture than planar model. As evidenced by the coseismic Coulomb stress changes caused by the three mainshocks at different depth slices, the stress loading mainly distributes on the active fault zones and the stress changes can well explain the spatial distribution of aftershocks. The first large Amatrice mainshock accelerates the occurrence of the Mw 5.9 Visso and Mw 6.6 Norcia earthquakes, with the positive stress changes at the hypocenter exceeding the stress triggering threshold (0.010×106 Pa) and up to 0.015×106 and 0.257×106 Pa, respectively. Furthermore, the Mw 5.9 Visso earthquake as well encourages the occurrence of the Mw 6.6 Norcia event with the increased stress changes of 0.052×106 Pa on the hypocenter. It is concluded that the stress transfer and accumulation play crucial roles on the linkage triggering mechanism among the mainshock-mainshock and mainshock-aftershocks. Noteworthily, the cumulative stress changes on the southwest segment of the Norcia Fault (NF), the southeast parts of the Montereale Fault System (MFS) and Mount Gorzano Fault (MGF) of the main regions are up to (1.5∼3.5) ×106 Pa. The cumulative stress changes have not been released sufficiently by aftershocks, which may increase the seismic hazard in those regions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Akinci A, Galadini F, Pantosti D, et al. (2009) Effect of time dependence on probabilistic seismic-hazard maps and deaggregation for the Central Apennines, Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 99: 585–610. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080053
Amato A, Azzara R, Chiarabba C, et al. (1998) The 1997 Umbria-Marche, Italy, Earthquake Sequence: A first look at the main shocks and aftershocks. Geophys Res Lett 25: 2861–2864. https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL51842
Boncio P, Lavecchia G, Milana G, et al. (2004) Seismogenesis in Central Apennines, Italy: an integrated analysis of minor earthquake sequences and structural data in the Amatrice-Campotosto area. Ann Geophys 47: 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3371
Bonini L, Maesano FE, Basili R, et al. (2016) Imaging the tectonic framework of the Amatrice (central Italy) earthquake sequence: new roles for old players? Ann Glob Anal Geom 59: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7229
Centamore E, Rossi D (2009) Neogene-Quaternary tectonics and sedimentation in the Central Apennines. Boll Soc Geol Ital 128: 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.03.012
Cheloni D, D’Agostino N, Scognamiglio L, et al. (2019a) Heterogeneous behavior of the Campotosto Normal Fault (Central Italy) imaged by InSAR GPS and strong-motion data: insights from the 18 January 2017 events. Remote Sens 11: 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121482
Cheloni D, De Novellis V, Albano M, et al. (2017) Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 44: 6778–6787. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073580
Cheloni D, Falcucci E, Gori S, et al. (2019b) Half — graben rupture geometry of the 30 october 2016 Mw6.6 Mt. Vettore — Mt. Bove Earthquake, Central Italy. J Geophys Res 124: 4091–4118. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015851
Chiarabba C, De Gori P, Cattaneo M, et al. (2018) Faults geometry and the role of fluids in the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Geophys Res Lett 45: 6963–6971. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077485
Chiaraluce L (2004) Complex normal faulting in the Apennines thrust-and-fold belt: The 1997 seismic sequence in Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 94: 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020052
Chiaraluce L, Di Stefano R, Tinti E, et al. (2017) The 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence: a first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol Res Lett 88: 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160221
Chiaraluce L, Valoroso L, Piccinini D, et al. (2011) The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system (central Italy) imaged by high resolution foreshock and aftershock locations. J Geophys Res 116. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008352
Cirella A, Piatanesi A, Cocco M, et al. (2009) Rupture history of the 2009 L’Aquila (Italy) earthquake from non-linear joint inversion of strong motion and GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 36. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039795
Deng J, Sykes LR (1997a) Evolution of the stress field in southern California and triggering of moderate-size earthquakes: A 200-year perspective. J Geophys Re 102: 9859–9886. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03897
Deng J, Sykes LR (1997b) Stress evolution in southern California and triggering of moderate-, small-, and micro-size earthquakes. J Geophys Re 102: 24411–24435. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB02127
Devoti R, D’Agostino N, Serpelloni E, et al. (2017) A combined velocity field of the Mediterranean Region. Ann Geophys 60. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7059
Emergeo Working Group (2016) The 24 August 2016 Amatrice Earthquake: Coseismic Effects. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.61568
Freed AM (2004) Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33: 335–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505
Galli P (2016) Rapporto sugli effetti macrosismici del terremoto del 24 Agosto 2016 di Amatrice in scala MCS. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.161323
Galli P, Galadini F, Pantosti D, et al. (2008) Twenty years of paleoseismology in Italy. Earth-Sci Rev 88: 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.01.001
Hardebeck JL, Nazareth JJ, Hauksson E (1998) The static stress change triggering model: Constraints from two southern California aftershock sequences. J Geophys Re 103: 24427–24437. https://doi.org/10.1029/98jb00573
Harris R A, Simpson RW (1992). Changes in static stress on southern California faults after the 1992 Landers earthquake. Nature 360(6401): 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/360251a0
Huang MH, Fielding EJ, Liang C, et al. (2017) Coseismic deformation and triggered landslides of the 2016 Mw 6.2 Amatrice earthquake in Italy. Geophys Res Lett 44: 1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071687
INGV Working Group (GPS data and data analysis center) (2016) Preliminary co-seismic displacements for the August 24: 2016 ML6, Amatrice (central Italy) earthquake from the analysis of continuous GPS stations. http://ring.gm.ingv.it/?p=1284
Jiang Z, Yuan L, Huang D, et al. (2017) Postseismic deformation associated with the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, China: Constraining fault geometry and investigating a detailed spatial distribution of afterslip. J Geodyn 112: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2017.09.001
Jiang Z, Yuan L, Huang D, et al. (2018) Postseismic deformation associated with the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal: Investigating ongoing afterslip and constraining crustal rheology. J Asian Earth Sci 156: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.12.039
Karakostas V, Mirek K, Mesimeri M, et al. (2017). The aftershock sequence of the 2008 Achaia, Greece, earthquake: joint analysis of seismicity relocation and persistent scatterers interferometry. Pure Appl Geophys 174(1): 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1368-y
King GCP, Stein RS, Lin J (1994) Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull seism soc am 78: 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00611
Lanza F, Chamberlain CJ, Jacobs K, et al. (2019). Crustal fault connectivity of the Mw 7.8 2016 Kaikōura earthquake constrained by aftershock relocations. Geophys Res Lett 46(12): 6487–6496. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082780
Lavecchia G, Castaldo R, De Nardis R, et al. (2017) Ground deformation and source geometry of the 24 August 2016 Amatrice earthquake (Central Italy) investigated through analytical and numerical modeling of DInSAR measurements and structural — geological data. Geophys Res Lett 43: 12389–12398. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071723
Lin J, Stein RS (2004) Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002607
Liu C, Zheng Y, Xie Z, et al. (2017) Rupture features of the 2016 Mw6.2 Norcia earthquake and its possible relationship with strong seismic hazards. Geophys Res Lett 44: 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071958
Mancini S, Segou M, Werner M, et al. (2019) Improving physics — based aftershock forecasts during the 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake Cascade. J Geophys Res 124: 8626–8643. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017874
Mildon ZK, Robert GP, Faure Walker JP, et al. (2017) Coulomb stress transfer and fault interaction over millennia on non-planar active normal faults: the Mw 6.5–5.0 seismic sequence of 2016–2017, central Italy, Geophys J Int 210: 2016–1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx213
Okada Y (1985) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 75: 1018–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(86)90674-1
Parsons T, Stein RS, Simpson RW, et al. (1999) Stress sensitivity of fault seismicity: A comparison between limited-offset oblique and major strike-slip faults. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104: 20183–20202. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900056
Petricca P, Barba S, Carminati E, et al. (2015) Graviquakes in Italy. Tectonophysics 656: 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.07.001
Pizzi A, Di Domenica A, Gallovic F, et al. (2017) Fault segmentation as constraint to the occurrence of the main shocks of the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence. Tectonics 36: 2370–2387. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017TC004652
Pizzi A, Galadini F (2009) Pre-existing cross-structures and active fault segmentation in the northern-central Apennines (Italy). Tectonophysics 476: 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.03.018
Pollitz F, Vergnolle M, Calais E (2003) Fault interaction and stress triggering of twentieth century earthquakes in Mongolia. J Geophys Res 108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002375
Pucci S, Martini PMD, Civico R, et al. (2016) Coseismic effects of the 2016 Amatrice seismic sequence: First geological results. Ann Geophys 59. https://doi.org/10.4401/AG-7195
Reasenberg PA, Simpson RW (1992) Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the loma prieta earthquake. Science 255: 1687–1690. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5052.1687
Ragon T, Sladen A, Simons M (2019). Accounting for uncertain fault geometry in earthquake source inversions-II: application to the M w 6.2 Amatrice earthquake, central Italy. Geophys J Int 218(1): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz180
Scognamiglio L, Tinti E, Casarotti E, et al. (2018) Complex fault geometry and rupture dynamics of the MW 6.5, 30 October 2016, central Italy earthquake. J Geophys Res 123: 2943–2964. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JB015603
Shan, B., Li, J., Han, L., Fang, L., Yang, C., Jin, B., Zheng, Y., Xiong, X., 2012. Coseismic Coulomb stress change caused by 2010 Ms =7.1 Yushu earthquake and its influence to 2011 Ms =5.2 Nangqen earthquake. Chin J Geophys Chin Ed 55: 3028–3042. (In Chinese) DQWX.0.2012-09-022
Shan B, Xiong X, Wang R, et al. (2013) Coulomb stress evolution along Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang Fault System since 1713 and its interaction with Wenchuan earthquake, May 12, 2008. Earth Planet Sci Lett 377–378: 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.06.044
Shan B, Xiong X, Zheng Y, et al. (2009) Stress changes on major faults caused by M w7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, May 12, 2008. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 52: 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0060-9
Shao Z, Ma H, Zhang L, et al. (2013) The characteristics of co-seismic slip and aftershocks distribution of the Ms 7.1 earthquake at QingHai Yushu in 2010 and its relationship with tectonics. Chinese J Geophys 56: 3800–3810. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20131121
Stein RS (2000) The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Translated World Seismology 402: 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/45144
Stein RS (2003) Earthquake conversations. Scientific American 288: 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0103-72
Tinti E, Scognamiglio L, Michelini A, et al. (2016a) Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the ML6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophys Res Lett 43(10): 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071263
Tinti E, Scognamiglio L, Michelini A, et al. (2016b) Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the ML 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite — fault inversion. Geophys Res Lett 43(10): 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071263
Toda S, Stein RS, Reasenberg PA, et al. (1998) Stress transferred by the 1995Mw= 6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J Geophys Res 103: 24543–24565. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JB00765
Walters RJ, Gregory LC, Wedmore LNJ, et al. (2018) Dual control of fault intersections on stop-start rupture in the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence. Earth Planet Sci Letts 500: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.07.043
Wan Y, Shen Z-K (2010) Static Coulomb stress changes on faults caused by the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan, China earthquake. Tectonophysics 491: 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.03.017
Wang R, Diao F, Hoechner A (2013) SDM — A geodetic inversion code incorporating with layered crust structure and curved fault geometry. EGU General Assembly Conference.
Wang R, Lorenzo-Martín F, Roth F (2006) PSGRN/PSCMP—a new code for calculating co- and post-seismic deformation, geoid and gravity changes based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory. Comput Geosci 32: 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.08.006
Wedmore LNJ, Faure Walker JP, Roberts GP, et al. (2017) A 667 year record of coseismic and interseismic Coulomb stress changes in central Italy reveals the role of fault interaction in controlling irregular earthquake recurrence intervals. J Geophys Res 122: 5691–5711. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014054
Wessel P, Smith WHF (1991) Free software helps map and display data. Eos, Trans Am Geophys Union 72: 441–441. https://doi.org/10.1029/90EO00319
Xiong X, Shan B, Zheng Y, et al. (2010) Stress transfer and its implication for earthquake hazard on the Kunlun Fault, Tibet. Tectonophysics 482: 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.07.020
Xu G, Xu C, Wen Y, et al. (2017) Source Parameters of the 2016–2017 Central Italy earthquake sequence from the Sentinel-1, ALOS-2 and GPS Data. Remote Sens 9: 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111182
Zhao B, Bürgmann R, Wang D, et al. (2017) Dominant controls of downdip afterslip and viscous relaxation on the postseismic displacements following the mw 7.9 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake. J Geophys Res 122: 8376–8401. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014366
Zhong S, Xu C, Yi L, et al. (2018) Focal mechanisms of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from high-rate GPS and broadband seismic waveforms. Remote Sens 10: 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040512
Zhou Y, Shan B, Xing X (2008) Parameters sensitivity analysis of Coulomb stress change in static stress triggering. J Geodesy Geodyn 28: 21–26. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5942.2008.05.005
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Chengli Liu in China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) for providing the data of fault lines and historical earthquakes. The coseismic GPS data obtained from (Cheloni et al. 2017) and the relocated aftershocks data between the three main earthquakes are recoded by Italian National Seismic Network, INGV (http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/). The open-source software, Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1991), is used to plot all Figures. This work is funded by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2020GZYZF0010) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41374032. No. 41704028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Lp., Huang, Df., Jiang, Zs. et al. Seismic stress perturbation and triggering patterns induced by the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequences. J. Mt. Sci. 18, 1424–1438 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6527-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6527-z