Abstract
The main objective of the present study is to introduce new empirical equations for the determination of breach geometrical dimensions and peak outflow discharge (Qp). Therefore, a historic failure database of 109 embankments was collected and examined. The most important factors that affect the breach evolution, including grading size, hydraulic, and outflow characteristics are also studied. Some of the parameters used for the determination of Qp and average breach width (Bave) have a significant effect on the erosion process, but they are less reflected in the technical literature. To study the behavior of non-cohesive soils during overtopping, 15 physical tests were performed at the laboratory, and the effects of interfering parameters were investigated. The experimental output hydrograph was used to simulate the hydrographs resulting from the failure of real dams, and recent artificial intelligence techniques along with linear and nonlinear regression models were employed. The area-time analysis of the laboratory hydrographs shows that the soil particle size and the characteristics of reservoir-basin significantly affect the rate of breach formation and outflow discharge. New relationships are introduced, based on the breach characteristics, by a combination of historical and experimental data, as well as case studies conducted on the hypothetical failure of 10 operational dams. The mathematical model is also used to simulate the process of breach evaluation. Based on statistical indices, comparison of the results, and sensitivity analysis, the developed equations can better express the susceptibility of materials to erosion and their application can minimize downstream vulnerabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407(1): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.013
ASCE (1987) Task Committee on Mechanics of Overflow Erosion on Embankments. Colorado, USA
Ashraf M, Soliman AH, El-Ghorab E, Zawahry AE (2018) Assessment of embankment dams breaching using large scale physical modeling and statistical methods. Water Sci 32(2): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2018.05.002
Azamathulla HM (2012) Gene expression programming for prediction of scour depth downstream of sills. J Hydrol 460–461: 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.034
Chanson H, Wang H (2013) Unsteady discharge calibration of a large V-notch weir. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. Flow Meas Instrum 29: 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.10.010
Chinnarasri C, Jirakitlerd S, Wongwises S (2004) Embankment dam breach and its outflow characteristics. Civ Eng Environ Syst 21(4): 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600412331328622
Coleman SE, Andrews DP, Webby MG (2002) Overtopping breaching of noncohesive homogeneous embankments. J Hydraul Eng 128(9): 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:9(829)
D’Oria M, Tanda MG (2012) Reverse flow routing in open channels: A bayesian geostatistical approach. J Hydrol 460–461(16): 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.055
Dhiman S, Patra KC (2017) Experimental study of embankment breach based on its construction parameters. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2017: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2017-383
Dhiman S, Patra KC (2019) Studies of dam disaster in India and equations for breach parameter. Nat Hazards 98(2): 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03731-z
Dodge Y (2008) The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Evans SG (1986) The maximum discharge of outburst floods caused by the breaching of man-made and natural dams. Can Geotech J 23(3): 385–387. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-053
Ferreira C (2006) Gene Expression Programming: Mathematical Modeling by An Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
Froehlich DC (1995) Peak outflow from breached embankment dam. J Water Res Plan Man 121(1): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1995)121:1(90)
Froehlich DC (2008) Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties. J Hydraul Eng 134(12): 1708–1721. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:12(1708)
Gao L, Hao L, Chen X (2014) Evaluation of ERA-interim monthly temperature data over the Tibetan Plateau. J Mt Sci 11(5): 1154–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3013-5
Gholampour A, Gandomi AH, Ozbakkaloglu T (2017) New formulations for mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete using gene expression programming. Constr Build Mater 130(5): 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.114
Gupta SK, Singh VP (2012) Discussion of enhanced predictions for peak outflow from breached embankment dams by Christopher I. Thornton, Michael W. Pierce, and Steven R. Abt. J Hydrol Eng 17(3): 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000470
Hahn W, Hanson GJ, Cook KR (2000) Breach morphology observations of embankment overtopping tests. Joint Conference on Water Resource Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40517(2000)411
Hanson GJ, Cook KR, Hunt, SL (2005) Physical modeling of overtopping erosion and breach formation of cohesive embankments. T ASAE 48(5): 1783–1794. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20012
Hanson GJ, Cook KR, Hahn W (2001) Evaluating headcut migration rates of earthen embankment breach tests. ASAE Annual Meeting, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.7386
Hassanzadeh Y (2005) Dam-break hydraulics, Publication No. 63. Iranian National Committee on Large Dams, Tehran, Iran (In Persian)
Ibrahim HT (2017) Prediction of monthly average river discharge using gene expression programming. Int J Civil Eng Techn 8(9): 993–1001.
Johnson FA, Illes P (1976) A classification of dam failures, water power and dam construction 28(12): 43–45.
Letelier J, Weber P (2000) Spike sorting based on discrete wavelet transform coefficients. J Neurosci Meth 101(2): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00250-8
Liang D, Lin B, Falconer RA (2007) A boundary-fitted numerical model for flood routing with shock-capturing capability. J Hydrol 332(3): 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.002
Liu Y, Zhang J, Zhu C, et al. (2019) Fuzzy-support vector machine geotechnical risk analysis method based on Bayesian network. J Mt Sci 16(8): 1975–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5358-7
Lodhi MS, Agrawal DK (2012) Dam-break flood simulation under various likely scenarios and mapping using GIS: Case of a proposed dam on River Yamuna, India. J Mt Sci 9(2): 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2148-5
Luitel DR, Siwakoti M, Jha PK (2019) Climate change and finger millet: Perception, trend and impact on yield in different ecological regions in Central Nepal. J Mt Sci 16(4): 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5165-1
Morris M, Hassan M, Kortenhaus A, et al. (2009) Breaching Process: A State of The Art Review, Report No. T06-06-03. HRWallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Painter TH, Skiles SM, Deems JS, et al. (2018) Variation in rising limb of colorado river snowmelt runoff hydrograph controlled by dust radiative forcing in snow. Geophys Res Lett 45(2): 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075826
Peng M, Zhang LM (2012) Breaching parameters of landslide dams. Landslides 9(1): 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0271-y
Peng M, Zhang LM, Chang DS, et al. (2014) Engineering risk mitigation measures for the landslide dams induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Eng Geol 180: 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.016
Pierce MW, Thornton CI, Abt SR (2010) Predicting peak outflow from breached embankment dams. J Hydrol Eng 15(5): 338349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000197
Pilotti M, Maranzoni A, Milanesi L, et al. (2014) Dam-break modeling in alpine valleys. J Mt Sci 11(6): 1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3042-0
Powledge GR, Ralston DC, Miller P, et al. (1989) Mechanics of overflow erosion on embankments. I: Research activities. J Hydraul Eng 115(8): 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:8(1040)
Rajaee T, Ebrahimi H, Nourani V (2019) A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling. J Hydrol 572: 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.037
Rozov AL (2003) Modeling of washout of dams. J Hydraul Res 41(6): 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680309506889
Sattar AMA (2013) Gene expression models for prediction of dam breach parameters. J Hydroinform 16(3): 550–571. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.084
Shen D, Shi Z, Peng M, et al. (2020) Longevity analysis of landslide dams. Landslides 17(8): 1797–1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01386-7
Shi ZM, Guan SG, Peng M, et al. (2015) Cascading breaching of the Tangjiashan landslide dam and two smaller downstream landslide dams. Eng Geol 193: 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.021
Singh KP, Snorrason A (1984) Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models. J Hydrol 68(1): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90217-8
Singh VP (1996) Dam Breach Modeling Technology. Water Science and Technology Library. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Sujono J, Shikasho S, Hiramatsu K (2004) A comparison of techniques for hydrograph recession analysis. Hydrol Process 18(3): 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1247
Thornton CI, Pierce MW, Abt SR (2011) Enhanced predictions for peak outflow from breached embankment dams. J Hydrol Eng 16(1): 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000288
USBR (1988) Downstream hazard classification guidelines, ACER, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Report No. 11.
Vaskinn KA, Lövoll A, Hoëg K, et al. (2004) Physical modeling of breach formation: large scale field tests, Dam safety. In: Proceedings of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, September, 2004.
Von Thun JL, Gillette DR (1990) Guidance on Breach Parameters, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, USA.
Wahl TL (1998) Prediction of Embankment Dam Breach Parameters: A Literature Review and Needs Assessment. DSO-98-004, Dam Safety Research Report. Denver, Colorado, USA
Walder JS, Iverson RM, Godt JW, et al. (2015) Controls on the breach geometry and flood hydrograph during overtopping of noncohesive earthen dams. Water Resour Res 51(8): 6701–6724. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016620
Wang B, Chen Y, Wu C, et al. (2018) Empirical and semi-analytical models for predicting peak outflows caused by embankment dam failures. J Hydrol 562: 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.049
Wang B, Liu W, Zhang J, et al. (2020) Enhancement of semi-theoretical models for predicting peak discharges in breached embankment dams. Environ Fluid Mech 20: 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09730-9
Wang W, Chau K, Cheng C, et al. (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydrol 374(3): 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019
Webby MG (1996) Discussion of peak outflow from breached embankment dam by David C. Froehlich. J Water Res Plan Man 122(4): 316–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:4(316)
Wishart JS (2007) Overtopping Breaching of Rock-Avalanche Dams. University of Canterbury, Christchrch, New Zealand.
Wongchuig SC, Mello CR, Chou SC (2018) Projections of the impacts of climate change on the water deficit and on the precipitation erosive indexes in Mantaro River Basin, Peru. J Mt Sci 15(2): 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4418-8
Wu W (2013) Simplified physically based model of earthen embankment breaching. J Hydraul Eng 139(8): 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000741
Xu Y, Zhang LM (2009) Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(12): 1957–1970. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000162
Zhang L, Peng M, Chang D, et al. (2016) Dam Failure Mechanisms and Risk Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.
Zhang LM, Peng M, Xu Y (2010) Assessing risks of breaching of earth dams and natural landslide dams. In: Indian Geotechnical Conference, GEOtrendz, India, pp 16–18.
Zhao T, Chen S, Fu C, et al. (2019) Centrifugal model tests and numerical simulations for barrier dam break due to overtopping. J Mt Sci 16(3): 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5024-0
Zhong Q, Chen S, Deng Z (2017) Numerical model for homogeneous cohesive dam breaching due to overtopping failure. J Mt Sci 14(3): 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3907-5
Zhong QM, Chen SS, Mei SA, et al. (2018) Numerical simulation of landslide dam breaching due to overtopping. Landslides 15(6): 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0935-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
11629_2020_6177_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Physical modeling into outflow hydrographs and breach characteristics of homogeneous earthfill dams failure due to overtopping
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kouzehgar, K., Hassanzadeh, Y., Eslamian, S. et al. Physical modeling into outflow hydrographs and breach characteristics of homogeneous earthfill dams failure due to overtopping. J. Mt. Sci. 18, 462–481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6177-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6177-1