Impact of grazing on soil, vegetation and ewe production performances in a semi-arid rangeland

Abstract

Controlled grazing is considered a good management strategy to maintain or increase the live weight of livestock and to reduce vegetation degradation of rangelands. The present study investigated soil characteristics, aboveground vegetation biomass dynamics and controlled grazinginduced changes in the live weight of local ewes in the semi-arid rangeland of Ahmadun, Ziarat, Balochistan province of Pakistan. An area of 115 ha was protected from livestock grazing in April 2014. In June 2015, soil characteristics within 0-30 cm depth i.e. soil organic matter (SOM), mineral nitrogen, pH and texture in controlled and uncontrolled grazing sites were assessed. Aboveground vegetation biomass measured in early (June) and late summer (August) in 2015 and 2016. The nutritional value i.e. crude protein, phosphorus (P), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K) of dominant plant species were assessed at the beginning of experiment in 2015. Vegetation cover of controlled and uncontrolled grazing sites was also measured during the two years of the study period using the VegMeasure software. From June to November in 2015 and 2016, controlled and uncontrolled livestock grazing sites were grazed on a daily basis by local ewes with a stocking rate of 2 and 1 head ha-1 respectively. Results reveal that the organic matter contents of coarse-textured, slightly alkaline soil of the study site were in the range of 9.4 - 17.6 g kg-1 soil and showed a strong positive correlation with aboveground vegetation biomass. The biomass of plants was 56.5% and 33% greater at controlled than uncontrolled grazing site in 2015 and 2016 respectively and plant cover was also higher at controlled than uncontrolled grazing site in both years. The nutrient contents were significantly (P<0.05) lower in grasses than shrubs. In both years, the controlled grazing increased the weight gain of ewes about two folds compared to the uncontrolled grazing. The results indicate that controlled grazing improved the vegetation biomass production and small ruminant productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ahmad S, Islam M (2011) DarkoMatovic (ed.), Rangeland Productivity and Improvement Potential in Highlands of Balochistan, Pakistan. Biomass-Detection, Production and Usage. ISBN: 978–953–307–492–4, In Tech. pp 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  2. AhmadS, Gul S, Achakzai AKK, et al. (2010) Seedling growth response of Seriphidium quettense to water stress and nonwater stress conditions. Phyton International Journal of Experimental Botany 79: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad S, Gul S, Islam M, et al. (2007) Seed dispersal and soil seed bank of Seriphidium quettens (ASTERACEAE) in highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Journal of Botanical Research. Inst. Texas 1: 569–575.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1990) Official methods of analysis. 15th edition U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey DW, Brown JR (2011) Rotational grazing systems and livestock grazing behavior in shrub-dominated semi-arid and arid rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D–09–00184.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Briske D, Nathan F, Sayre L, et al. (2011) Origin, persistence, and resolution of the rotational grazing debate: Integrating human dimensions into rangeland research. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64: 325–3341. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D–10–00084.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Catling PM, McElroy AR, Spicer KW (1994) Potential forage value of some eastern Canadian sedges (Cypeaceae: Carex). Journal of Range Management 47: 226–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Craft CB, Seneca ED, Broome SW (1991) Loss on ignition and kjeldahl digestion for estimating organic carbon and total nitrogen in estuarine marsh soils: calibration with dry combustion. Estuaries 14: 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies J, Poulsen L, Schulte-Herbrüggen B, et al. (2012) Conserving Dryland Biodiversity. Global Drylands Initiative, IUCN, Nairobi, 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Enri SR, Probo M, Farruggia A, et al. (2017) A biodiversityfriendly rotational grazing system enhancing flower-visiting insect assemblages while maintaining animal and grassland productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 241: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Estefan G, Sommer R, Ryan J (2013) Methods of Soil, Plant, and Water Analysis: A manual for the West Asia and North Africa region. Third Edition, International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) Box 114/5055, Beirut, Lebanon.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fallahzadi J, Hajabbasi MA (2011) Soil organic matter status changes with cultivation of overgrazed pastures in semi-dry west central Iran. International Journal of Soil Science 6: 114–123. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijss.2011.114.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. FAO (1983) Report of the assistance to rangeland and livestock development survey in Balochistan. TCP/PAK 0107, FAO Technical Cooperation Program, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Pakistan

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gamoun M, Tarhouni M, Belgacem A, et al. (2010) Effects of grazing and trampling on primary production and soil surface in North African rangelands. Ekologia (Bratislava) 29: 219–226. https://doi.org/10.4149/ekol_2010_02_219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gamoun M, Hanchi B (2014) Natural vegetation cover dynamic under grazing-rotation managements in desert rangelands of Tunisia. Arid Ecosystems 4: 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096114040076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grigoli AD, Todar M, Miceli GD, et al. (2012) Effects of continuous and rotational grazing of different forage species on ewe milk production. Small Ruminant Research 106: 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.04.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrick JE, Van Zee JW, McCord SE, et al. (2015) Monitoring Manual of Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems.2nd Edition. USDa-ARS Jornda Experimental Range Las Cruces, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holechek JL (1991) Chihuahuan desert rangeland, livestock grazing, and sustainability. Rangelands 13: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holechek JL, Galt D, Joseph J, et al. (2003) Moderate and light cattle grazing effects on Chihuahuan desert rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56: 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang JP, Wang XJ, Zhang J (2013) Evaluating loss-on-ignition method for determinations of soil organic and inorganic carbon in arid soils of northwestern China. Pedosphere 23: 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002–0160(13)60052–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kristensen ES (1988) Influence of defoliation regime on herbage production and characteristics of intake by dairy cows as affected by grazing intensity. Grass and Forage Science 43: 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Louhaichi M, Salkini AK, Petersen SL (2009) Effect of small ruminant grazing on the plant community characteristics of semi-arid Mediterranean ecosystems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11: 681–689.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Louhaichi M, Johnson MD, Woerz AL, et al. (2010) Digital charting technique for monitoring rangeland vegetation cover at local scale. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12: 406–410.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Louhaichi M, Hassan S, Clifton K, et al. (2017) A reliable and non-destructive method for estimating forage shrub cover and biomass in arid environments using digital vegetation charting technique. Agroforestry Systems 91: 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10457–017–0079–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Nutrient requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids and new world Camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. pp 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oomen RJ, Ewert F, Snyman HA (2016) Modelling rangeland productivity in response to degradation in a semi-arid climate. Ecological modelling 322: 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O'Reagain P, Bushell J, Holloway C, et al. (2009) Managing for rainfall variability: effect of grazing strategy on cattle production in a dry tropical savanna. Animal Production Science 49: 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Belgacem A, Louhaichi M (2013) The vulnerability of native rangeland plant species to global climate change in the West Asia and North African regions. Climatic Change 119: 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–013–0701-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pacaldo RS, Volk TA, Briggs RD (2014) No significant differences in soil organic carbon contents along a chronosequence of shrub willow biomass crop fields. Biomass and Bioenergy 58: 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biombioe.2013.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qasim S, Gul S, Shah MH,et al. (2017) Influence of grazing exclosure on vegetation biomass and soil quality. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 5: 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reeves MC, Moreno AL, Bagne KE, et al. (2014) Estimating climate change effects on net primary production of rangelands in the United States. Climatic Change 126: 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–014–1235–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Robertson S (2011) Direct estimation of organic matter by loss on ignition: methods. Property of SFU Soil Science Lab. Available online at: ttps://www.sfu.ca/soils/lab_documents/Estimation_Of_Organic_Matter_By_LOI.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002–0160(11)60149–5

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sanjari G, Ghadiri H, Ciesiolka CA, et al. (2008) Comparing the effects of continuous and time-controlled grazing systems on soil characteristics in Southeast Queensland. Soil Research 46: 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shah M (2016) Influence of Grazing Exclusion on Plant Community Composition, Fecundity of Dominant Plant Species and Soil Seed Bank of Hazarganji Chiltan Mountain, Balochistan, Pakistan. MPhil thesis, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women’s University, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sims GK, Ellsworth TR, Mulvaney RL (1995) Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extract. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26: 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629509369298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Teague WR, Dowhower SL, Baker SA, et al. (2011) Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 141: 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trott H, Wachendorf M, Ingwersen B, et al. (2004) Performance and environmental effects of forage production on sandy soils: I. Impact of defoliation system and nitrogen input on performance and N balance of grassland. Grass and Forage Science 59: 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  38. UN (2011) Global Drylands: a UN System-wide Response. Prepared by the United Nations (UN) Environment Management Group (EMG).United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Oudenhoven APE, Veerkamp CJ, Alkemade R, et al. (2015) Effects of different management regimes on soil erosion and surface runoff in semi-arid to sub-humid rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments 121: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted within the framework of collaborative research between the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) which was supported by the USAID under Agriculture Innovation Program (AIP) Pakistan. This work was also supported by the ICARDA and the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock (CRP Livestock). We thank the Forest and wildlife department, Govt. of Balochistan and all the staff of Ziarat Division who collaborated in setting up the experiment.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shamim Gul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M., Razzaq, A., Gul, S. et al. Impact of grazing on soil, vegetation and ewe production performances in a semi-arid rangeland. J. Mt. Sci. 15, 685–694 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4702-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Grazing exclosure
  • Soil organic matter
  • Vegetation cover
  • VegMeasure