Impact of grazing on soil, vegetation and ewe production performances in a semi-arid rangeland
- 8 Downloads
Controlled grazing is considered a good management strategy to maintain or increase the live weight of livestock and to reduce vegetation degradation of rangelands. The present study investigated soil characteristics, aboveground vegetation biomass dynamics and controlled grazinginduced changes in the live weight of local ewes in the semi-arid rangeland of Ahmadun, Ziarat, Balochistan province of Pakistan. An area of 115 ha was protected from livestock grazing in April 2014. In June 2015, soil characteristics within 0-30 cm depth i.e. soil organic matter (SOM), mineral nitrogen, pH and texture in controlled and uncontrolled grazing sites were assessed. Aboveground vegetation biomass measured in early (June) and late summer (August) in 2015 and 2016. The nutritional value i.e. crude protein, phosphorus (P), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K) of dominant plant species were assessed at the beginning of experiment in 2015. Vegetation cover of controlled and uncontrolled grazing sites was also measured during the two years of the study period using the VegMeasure software. From June to November in 2015 and 2016, controlled and uncontrolled livestock grazing sites were grazed on a daily basis by local ewes with a stocking rate of 2 and 1 head ha-1 respectively. Results reveal that the organic matter contents of coarse-textured, slightly alkaline soil of the study site were in the range of 9.4 - 17.6 g kg-1 soil and showed a strong positive correlation with aboveground vegetation biomass. The biomass of plants was 56.5% and 33% greater at controlled than uncontrolled grazing site in 2015 and 2016 respectively and plant cover was also higher at controlled than uncontrolled grazing site in both years. The nutrient contents were significantly (P<0.05) lower in grasses than shrubs. In both years, the controlled grazing increased the weight gain of ewes about two folds compared to the uncontrolled grazing. The results indicate that controlled grazing improved the vegetation biomass production and small ruminant productivity.
KeywordsGrazing exclosure Soil organic matter Vegetation cover VegMeasure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study was conducted within the framework of collaborative research between the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) which was supported by the USAID under Agriculture Innovation Program (AIP) Pakistan. This work was also supported by the ICARDA and the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock (CRP Livestock). We thank the Forest and wildlife department, Govt. of Balochistan and all the staff of Ziarat Division who collaborated in setting up the experiment.
- Ahmad S, Islam M (2011) DarkoMatovic (ed.), Rangeland Productivity and Improvement Potential in Highlands of Balochistan, Pakistan. Biomass-Detection, Production and Usage. ISBN: 978–953–307–492–4, In Tech. pp 289–304.Google Scholar
- AhmadS, Gul S, Achakzai AKK, et al. (2010) Seedling growth response of Seriphidium quettense to water stress and nonwater stress conditions. Phyton International Journal of Experimental Botany 79: 19–23.Google Scholar
- Ahmad S, Gul S, Islam M, et al. (2007) Seed dispersal and soil seed bank of Seriphidium quettens (ASTERACEAE) in highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Journal of Botanical Research. Inst. Texas 1: 569–575.Google Scholar
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1990) Official methods of analysis. 15th edition U.S.A.Google Scholar
- Davies J, Poulsen L, Schulte-Herbrüggen B, et al. (2012) Conserving Dryland Biodiversity. Global Drylands Initiative, IUCN, Nairobi, 84 pp.Google Scholar
- Enri SR, Probo M, Farruggia A, et al. (2017) A biodiversityfriendly rotational grazing system enhancing flower-visiting insect assemblages while maintaining animal and grassland productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 241: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Estefan G, Sommer R, Ryan J (2013) Methods of Soil, Plant, and Water Analysis: A manual for the West Asia and North Africa region. Third Edition, International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) Box 114/5055, Beirut, Lebanon.Google Scholar
- FAO (1983) Report of the assistance to rangeland and livestock development survey in Balochistan. TCP/PAK 0107, FAO Technical Cooperation Program, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, PakistanGoogle Scholar
- Herrick JE, Van Zee JW, McCord SE, et al. (2015) Monitoring Manual of Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems.2nd Edition. USDa-ARS Jornda Experimental Range Las Cruces, New Mexico.Google Scholar
- Holechek JL (1991) Chihuahuan desert rangeland, livestock grazing, and sustainability. Rangelands 13: 115–120.Google Scholar
- Louhaichi M, Salkini AK, Petersen SL (2009) Effect of small ruminant grazing on the plant community characteristics of semi-arid Mediterranean ecosystems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11: 681–689.Google Scholar
- Louhaichi M, Johnson MD, Woerz AL, et al. (2010) Digital charting technique for monitoring rangeland vegetation cover at local scale. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12: 406–410.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Nutrient requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids and new world Camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. pp 256–266.Google Scholar
- Robertson S (2011) Direct estimation of organic matter by loss on ignition: methods. Property of SFU Soil Science Lab. Available online at: ttps://www.sfu.ca/soils/lab_documents/Estimation_Of_Organic_Matter_By_LOI.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002–0160(11)60149–5Google Scholar
- Shah M (2016) Influence of Grazing Exclusion on Plant Community Composition, Fecundity of Dominant Plant Species and Soil Seed Bank of Hazarganji Chiltan Mountain, Balochistan, Pakistan. MPhil thesis, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women’s University, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.Google Scholar
- Trott H, Wachendorf M, Ingwersen B, et al. (2004) Performance and environmental effects of forage production on sandy soils: I. Impact of defoliation system and nitrogen input on performance and N balance of grassland. Grass and Forage Science 59: 41–55.Google Scholar
- UN (2011) Global Drylands: a UN System-wide Response. Prepared by the United Nations (UN) Environment Management Group (EMG).United Nations.Google Scholar