Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 716–730 | Cite as

Role of debris flow on the change of 10Be concentration in rapidly eroding watersheds: a case study on the Seti River, central Nepal

  • Dong Eun Kim
  • Yeong Bae SeongEmail author
  • Kwang Hee Choi
  • Byung Yong Yu


The concentration of cosmogenic 10Be in riverine sediments has been widely used as a proxy for catchment-wide denudation rate (CWDR). One of the key assumptions of this approach is that sediments originating from sub-basins with different erosional histories are well mixed. A tragic debris flow occurred in the Seti River watershed, central Nepal, on May 5, 2012. This catastrophic debris flow was triggered by slope failure on the peak of Annapurna IV and resulted in many casualties in the lower Seti Khola. However, it provided an opportunity to test the assumption of equal mixing of sediments in an understudied rapidly eroding watershed. This study documents the CWDR of 10Be to evaluate the extent of the influence of episodic erosional processes such as debris flow on the spatio-temporal redistribution of 10Be concentrations. Our data show that the debris flow caused little change in CWDR across the debris flow event. In addition to isotopic measurement, we calculated denudation rates by using the modeled concentrations in pre- and post-landslide sediments based on the local 10Be production rate. The modeled result showed little change across the event, indicating that the debris flow in May 2012 played a minor role in sediment evacuation, despite the rapid erosion in the catchment. Our study concludes that although the 2012 event caused many casualties and severe damage, it was a low-magnitude, high frequency event.


Seti River Beryllium-10 (10Be) Catchment-wide denudation rate (CWDR) Debris flow Episodic erosional processes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was supported by the College of Education, Korea University Grant in 2016. We would express sincere thanks to Ms. Su Young Lee, Prof. Kanhaiya Sapkota and Narendra Khanal for their help on initiation of this research and field survey. The early version of this manuscript was greatly improved thanks to the comments by Dr. J.M. Byun.


  1. Balco G, Stone JO, Lifton NA, et al. (2008) A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements. Quaternary Geochronology 3 (3): 174–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2007. 12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barros A, Joshi M, Putkonen J, et al. (2000) A study of the 1999 monsoon rainfall in a mountainous region in central Nepal using TRMM products and rain gauge observations. Geophysical Research Letters 27 (22): 3683–3686. DOI: 10.1029/2000GL011827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhandary N, Dahal R., Okamura M (2012) Preliminary understanding of the Seti River debris-flood in Pokhara, Nepal, on May 5th, 2012-A report based on a quick field visit program. ISSMGE Bulletin 6 (4): 8–18Google Scholar
  4. Bollinger L, Avouac J, Beyssac O, et al. (2004) Thermal structure and exhumation history of the Lesser Himalaya in central Nepal. Tectonics 23: TC5015. DOI: 10.1029/2003TC001564Google Scholar
  5. Bookhagen B (2010) Appearance of extreme monsoonal rainfall events and their impact on erosion in the Himalaya. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 1 (1): 37–50. DOI: 10.1080/1947570 1003625737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bookhagen B, Burbank DW (2006) Topography, relief, and TRMM-derived rainfall variations along the Himalaya. Geophysical Research Letters 33(8): L08405. DOI: 10.1029/2006GL026037Google Scholar
  7. Bookhagen B, Burbank DW (2010) Toward a complete Himalayan hydrological budget: Spatiotemporal distribution of snowmelt and rainfall and their impact on river discharge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 115(F3). DOI: 10.1029/2009JF001426Google Scholar
  8. Brown ET, Stallard RF, Larsen MC, et al. (1995) Denudation rates determined from the accumulation of in situ-produced 10Be in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 129 (1): 193–202. DOI: 10.1016/0012-821X(94)00249-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burbank DW, Blythe A, Putkonen J, et al. (2003) Decoupling of erosion and precipitation in the Himalayas. Nature 426 (6967): 652–655. DOI: 10.1038/nature02187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chmeleff J, von Blanckenburg F, Kossert K, et al. (2010) Determination of the 10Be half-life by multicollector ICP-MS and liquid scintillation counting. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268 (2): 192–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coe JA, Godt JW, Parise M, et al. (2003) Estimating debris-flow probability using fan stratigraphy, historic records, and drainage-basin morphology, Interstate 70 highway corridor, central Colorado, USA. In: Proc 3rd Int Conf on Debris Flow Hazard Mitigation. Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment No. 2. Davos, Swiss. pp 1085-1096Google Scholar
  12. Foster MA, Anderson RS (2016) Assessing the effect of a major storm on 10Be concentrations and inferred basin-averaged denudation rates. Quaternary Geochronology 34: 58–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2016.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabet E, Langner H, Burbank DW, et al. (2004a) Geomorphic controls on chemical weathering rates in the High Himalayas of Nepal. In: Proceedings AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.Google Scholar
  14. Gabet EJ, Burbank DW, Pratt-Sitaula B, et al. (2008) Modern erosion rates in the High Himalayas of Nepal. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 267(3-4): 482–494. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gabet EJ, Burbank DW, Putkonen JK, et al. (2004b) Rainfall thresholds for landsliding in the Himalayas of Nepal. Geomorphology 63 (3): 131–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph. 2004.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabet EJ, Pratt-Sitaula BA, Burbank DW (2004c) Climatic controls on hillslope angle and relief in the Himalayas. Geology 32 (7): 629–632. DOI: 10.1130/G20641.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godard V, Bourlès DL, Spinabella F, Burbank DW, et al. (2014) Dominance of tectonics over climate in Himalayan denudation. Geology 42 (3): 243–246. DOI: 10.1130/g35342.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granger DE, Kirchner JW, Finkel R (1996) Spatially averaged long-term erosion rates measured from in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides in alluvial sediment. The Journal of Geology 104: 249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heisinger B, Lal D, Jull AT, et al. (2002a) Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons: 2. Capture of negative muons. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 200 (3): 357–369. DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00641-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heisinger B, Lal D, Jull AT, et al. (2002b) Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons: 1. Fast muons. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 200 (3): 345–355. DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00640-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herman F, Copeland P, Avouac JP, et al. (2010) Exhumation, crustal deformation, and thermal structure of the Nepal Himalaya derived from the inversion of thermochronological and thermobarometric data and modeling of the topography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 115(B6). DOI: 10.1029/2008JB006126Google Scholar
  22. Hodges KV, Wobus C, Ruhl K, et al. (2004) Quaternary deformation, river steepening, and heavy precipitation at the front of the Higher Himalayan ranges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 220(3-4): 379–389. DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(04)00063-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim D-E, Seong YB, Byun J, et al. (2016) Geomorphic disequilibrium in the Eastern Korean Peninsula: Possible evidence for reactivation of a rift-flank margin. Geomorphology 254: 130–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kober F, Hippe K, Salcher B, et al. (2012) Debris-flow–dependent variation of cosmogenically derived catchmentwide denudation rates. Geology 40 (10): 935–938. DOI: 10.1130/g33406.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohl C, Nishiizumi K (1992) Chemical isolation of quartz for measurement of in-situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56 (9): 3583–3587. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90401-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korschinek G, Bergmaier A, Faestermann T, et al. (2010) A new value for the half-life of 10Be by heavy-ion elastic recoil detection and liquid scintillation counting. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268 (2): 187–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lal D (1991) Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces: in situ nuclide production rates and erosion models. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 104(2-4): 424–439. DOI: 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90220-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lavé J, Avouac JP (2001) Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 106(B11): 26561–26591. DOI: 10.1029/2001JB000359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NASA (2012) Landslide and Deadly Flood in Nepal: Image of the Day. (Available online at: http://earthobservatory., accessed on 24 May 2012)Google Scholar
  30. Niemi NA, Oskin M, Burbank DW, et al. (2005) Effects of bedrock landslides on cosmogenically determined erosion rates. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 237 (3): 480–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ouimet W, Whipple K, Royden L, et al. (2010) Regional incision of the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Lithosphere 2 (1): 50–63. DOI: 10.1130/L57.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petley D, Stark C (2012) Understanding the Seti River landslide in Nepal. (Available online at: l, accessed on 2012-05-25).Google Scholar
  33. Pratt-Sitaula B, Burbank DW, Heimsath A, et al. (2004) Landscape disequilibrium on 1000–10,000 year scales Marsyandi River, Nepal, central Himalaya. Geomorphology 58(1-4): 223–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pratt-Sitaula B, Garde M, Burbank DW, et al. (2007) Bedloadto-suspended load ratio and rapid bedrock incision from Himalayan landslide-dam lake record. Quaternary Research 68 (1): 111–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2007.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rickenmann D, Koschni A (2010) Sediment loads due to fluvial transport and debris flows during the 2005 flood events in Switzerland. Hydrological Processes 24 (8): 993–1007. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robert X, Van Der Beek P, Braun J, et al. (2009) Assessing Quaternary reactivation of the Main Central thrust zone (central Nepal Himalaya): New thermochronologic data and numerical modeling. Geology 37 (8): 731–734. DOI: 10.1130/G25736A.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlunegger F, Hinderer M (2003) Pleistocene/Holocene climate change, re-establishment of fluvial drainage network and increase in relief in the Swiss Alps. Terra Nova 15 (2): 88–95. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3121.2003.00469.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwanghart W, Bernhardt A, Stolle A, et al. (2016) Repeated catastrophic valley infill following medieval earthquakes in the Nepal Himalaya. Science 351 (6269): 147–150. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac9865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Searle MP, Godin L (2003) The south Tibetan detachment and the Manaslu Leucogranite: A structural reinterpretation and restoration of the Annapurna-Manaslu Himalaya, Nepal. The Journal of Geology 111 (5): 505–523. DOI: 10.1086/376763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone JO (2000) Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 105(B10): 23753–23759. DOI: 10.1029/2000jb900181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. von Blanckenburg F (2005) The control mechanisms of erosion and weathering at basin scale from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 237 (3): 462–479. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. West AJ, Hetzel R, Li G, et al. (2014) Dilution of 10Be in detrital quartz by earthquake-induced landslides: Implications for determining denudation rates and potential to provide insights into landslide sediment dynamics. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 396: 143–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whipple KX (2001) Fluvial landscape response time: how plausible is steady-state denudation?. American Journal of Science 301(4-5): 313–325. DOI: 10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wittmann H, von Blanckenburg F, Maurice L, et al. (2010) Sediment production and delivery in the Amazon River basin quantified by in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides and recent river loads. Geological Society of America Bulletin B30317. DOI: 10.1130/B30317.1Google Scholar
  45. Yanites BJ, Tucker GE, Anderson RS (2009) Numerical and analytical models of cosmogenic radionuclide dynamics in landslide-dominated drainage basins. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 114(F1). DOI: 10.1029/2008JF 00108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Eun Kim
    • 1
  • Yeong Bae Seong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kwang Hee Choi
    • 2
  • Byung Yong Yu
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of GeographySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Yeongsan River Basin Environmental OfficeMinistry of EnvironmentGwangjuKorea
  3. 3.Korea Institute of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations