Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 636–648 | Cite as

Debris flow hazard assessment by means of numerical simulations: implications for the Rotolon creek valley (Northern Italy)

  • Teresa Salvatici
  • Stefano Morelli
  • Veronica Pazzi
  • William Frodella
  • Riccardo Fanti
Article

Abstract

On 4th November 2010, a debris flow detached from a large debris cover accumulated above the lowermost portion of the Rotolon landslide (Vicentine Pre-Alps, NE Italy) and channelized in the valley below within the Rotolon Creek riverbed. Such event evolved into a highly mobile and sudden debris flow, damaging some hydraulic works and putting at high risk four villages located along the creek banks. A monitoring campaign was carried out by means of a ground based radar interferometer (GB-InSAR) to evaluate any residual displacement risk in the affected area and in the undisturbed neighbouring materials. Moreover, starting from the current slope condition, a landslide runout numerical modelling was performed by means of DAN-3D code to assess the impacted areas, flow velocity, and deposit distribution of the simulated events. The rheological parameters necessary for an accurate modelling were obtained through the back analysis of the 2010 debris flow event. Back analysis was calibrated with all of the available terrain data coming from field surveys and ancillary documents, such as topographic, geomorphological and geological maps, with pre- and post-event LiDAR derived DTMs, and with orthophotos. Finally, to identify new possible future debris flow source areas as input data for the new modelling, all the obtained terrain data were reanalysed and integrated with the GB-InSAR displacement maps; consequently, new simulations were made to forecast future events. The results show that the integration of the selected modelling technique with ancillary data and radar displacement maps can be a very useful tool for managing problems related to debris flow events in the examined area.

Keywords

Debris flow DAN-3D GB-InSAR Numerical modelling Deep Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation (DSGSD) Rotolon Creek 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agliardi F, Crosta GB, Zanchi A, et al. (2009) Onset and timing of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in the eastern Alps, Italy. Geomorphology 103: 113–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altieri V, Colombo P, Dal Prà A (1994) Study for the evaluation of slope stability conditions and Rotolon creek valley located in the Upper Agno Valley in the munivipality of Recoaro Terme (Vicenza). Relazione Geologico–Geotecnica. Regione del Veneto Segreteria Regionale per il Territorio–Dipartimento Lavori Pubblici–Venezia 97. (In Italian).Google Scholar
  3. Antonello G, Casagli N, Farina P, et al. (2004) Ground-based SAR interferometry for monitoring mass movements. Landslides 1 (1): 21–28. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-003-0009-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamler R, Hartl P (1998) Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Inverse Problems 14(4): R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbieri G, De Zanche V, Di Lallo E, et al. (1980) Recoaro geological map. Memorie Scietà Geologica XXXIV Padova. pp 23–52. (In Italian).Google Scholar
  6. Brayshaw D, Hassan MA (2009) Debris flow initiation and sediment recharge in gullies. Geomorphology 109 (3): 122–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardi F, Frodella W, Ciampalini A, et al. (2014) Integration between ground based and satellite SAR data in landslide mapping: The San Fratello case study. Geomorphology 223: 45–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.06.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bossi G, Crema S, Frigerio S, et al. (2015a) The Rotolon catchment early-warning system. In: Lollino G et al. (eds.), Engineering Geology for Society and Territory. Springer International Publishing 3: 91–95. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2_18Google Scholar
  9. Bossi G, Cavalli M, Crema S, et al. (2015b) Multi-temporal LiDAR-DTMs as a tool for modelling a complex landslide: a case study in the Rotolon catchment (eastern Italian Alps). Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 15 (4): 715–722. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-15-715-2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coe JA, Cannon SH, Sant PM (2008) Introduction to the special issue on debris flows initiated by runoff, erosion, and sediment entrainment in western North America. Geomorphology 96 (3): 247–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph. 2007.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corominas J (1996) The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 33 (2): 260–271. DOI: 10.1139/t96-005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coussot P, Meunier M (1996) Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows. Earth-Science Reviews 40 (3): 209–227. DOI: 10.1016/0012-8252(95)00065-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chow VT (1959) Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York. p 465.Google Scholar
  14. Evans SG, Clague JJ (1992) Glacier-related hazards and climatic change. In proceeding of the world at risk: Natural hazards and climate change, AIP Conference, Boston, Massachusetts (USA), 4-16 Jan 1992. pp 48–60. DOI: 10.1063/1.43890Google Scholar
  15. McColl ST, Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ (2010) Glacier retreat and rock-slope stability: debunking debuttressing. Geologically active: delegate papers 11th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand, 5-10 September 2010. pp 467–474.Google Scholar
  16. Fidolini F, Pazzi V, Frodella W, et al. (2015) Geomorphological characterization, monitoring and modeling of the Monte Rotolon complex landslide (Recoaro Terme, Italy). In: Lollino G (eds.), Engineering Geology for Society and Territory. Springer International Publishing. pp 1311–1315. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frigerio S, Schenato L, Bossi G, et al. (2014) A web-based platform for automatic and continuous landslide monitoring: The Rotolon (Eastern Italian Alps) case study. Computers & Geosciences 63: 96–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frodella W, Morelli S, Fidolini F, et al. (2014) Geomorphology of the Rotolon landslide (Veneto Region, Italy). Journal of Maps 10 (3): 394–401. DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2013.869666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frodella W, Fidolini F, Morelli S, et al. (2015) Application of infrared thermography for landslide mapping: The rotolon DSGDS case study. Rendiconti Online Società Geologica Italiana 35: 144–147. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frodella W, Ciampalini A, Gigli G, et al. (2016) Synergic use of satellite and ground based remote sensing methods for monitoring the San Leo rock cliff (Northern Italy). Geomorphology 264: 80–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsü KJ (1975) Catastrophic debris streams (sturzstroms) generated by rockfalls. Geological Society of America Bulletin 86 (1): 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazard for design of remedial measures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 21 (4): 663–677. DOI: 10.1139/t84-073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hungr O (1995) A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 32 (4): 610–623. DOI: 10.1139/t95-063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hungr O, Evans SG (1996) Rock avalanche runout prediction using a dynamic model. In: Senneset K, Balkema AA (eds.). Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Landslides Trondheim Norway, 17-21 June 1996. Rotterdam, The Netherlands. pp 233–238.Google Scholar
  25. Hungr O, McDougall S (2009) Two numerical models for landslide dynamic analysis. Computers & Geosciences 35 (5): 978–992. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Reviews of Geophysics 35 (3): 245–296. DOI:10.1029/97RG00426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jakob M (2005) A size classification for debris flows. Engineering geology 79 (3): 151–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo. 2005.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDougall S, Hungr O (2004) A model for the analysis of rapid landslide motion across three -dimensional terrain. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 41 (6): 1084–1097. DOI: 10.1139/T04-052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McDougall S (2006) A new continuum dynamic model for the analysis of extremely rapid landslide motion across complex 3D terrain. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
  30. Mizuyama T, Kobashi S, Ou G (1992) Prediction of debris flow peak discharge. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Interpraevent, Bern, Switzerland. pp 99–108.Google Scholar
  31. Morelli S, Salvatici T, Nolesini T, et al. (2016) Analogue and numerical modeling of the Stromboli hot avalanches. In: Aversa S, Cascini L, Picarelli L, Scavia C (eds.), Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Experience, Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Landslides, 12-19 June 2016, Napoli, Italy. CRC Press, Napoli, Italy. pp 1493–1500. DOI: 10.1201/b21520-184Google Scholar
  32. Morelli S, Monroy VHG, Gigli G, et al. (2010) The Tancitaro debris avalanche: characterization, propagation and modeling. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 193 (1): 93–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nocentini M, Tofani V, Gigli G, et al. (2015) Modeling debris flows in volcanic terrains for hazard mapping: the case study of Ischia Island (Italy). Landslides 12 (5): 831–846. DOI:10.1007/s10346-014-0524-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nolesini T, Di Traglia F, Del Ventisette C, et al. (2013) Deformations and slope instability on Stromboli volcano: Integration of GBInSAR data and analog modeling. Geomorphology 180-181: 242–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph. 2012.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pazzi V, Morelli S, Pratesi F, et al. (2016) Assessing the safety of schools affected by geo-hydrologic hazards: The geohazard safety classification (GSC). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 15: 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr. 2015.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pierson TC, Scott KM (1985) Downstream dilution of a lahar: transition from debris flow to hyperconcentrated streamflow. Water Resources Research 21 (10): 1511–1524. DOI: 10.1029/WR021i010p01511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prochaska A, Santi P, Higgins J, et al. (2008) A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity, Landslides 5 (4): 431–444. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-008-0137-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Revellino P, Hungr O, Guadagno FM, et al. (2004) Velocity and runout prediction of destructive debris flows and debris avalanches in pyroclastic deposits, Campania Region, Italy. Environmental Geology 45 (3): 295–311. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-003-0885-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rickenmann D (1999) Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards 19 (1): 47–77. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008064220727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rudolf H, Leva D, Tarchi D, et al. (1999) A mobile and versatile SAR system. In Proceeding of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1999. IGARSS'99. IEEE 1999 International. pp 592–594. DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.1999.773575Google Scholar
  41. Salvatici T, Di Roberto A, Di Traglia F, et al. (2016a) From hot rocks to glowing avalanches: Numerical modelling of gravityinduced pyroclastic density currents and hazard maps at the Stromboli volcano (Italy). Geomorphology 273: 93–106. DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salvatici T, Morelli S, Di Traglia F (2016b) Runout modelling of gravity-induced pyroclastic density currents at Stromboli volcano (Italy). Rendiconti Online Soietà Geologica Italiana 41: 195–198. DOI: 10.3301/ROL.2016.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Savage SB, Hutter K (1989) The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 199: 177–215. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112089000340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schneuwly-Bollschweiler M, Stoffel M, Rudolf-Miklau F (2012) Dating torrential processes on fans and cones: methods and their application for hazard and risk assessment. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Vol. 47.Google Scholar
  45. Schraml K, Thomschitz B, McArdell BW, et al. (2015) Modeling debris-flow runout patterns on two alpine fans with different dynamic simulation models. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions 3 (2): 1397–1425. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-15-1483-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tarchi D, Casagli N, Fanti R, et al. (2003) Landslide monitoring by using ground-based SAR interferometry: an example of application to the Tessina landslide in Italy. Engineering Geology 68 (1): 15–30. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00196-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trivelli G (1991) History of the territory and inhabitants of Recoaro, in Recoaro Terme municipality. Istituto Geografico De Agostini. (In Italian)Google Scholar
  48. Voellmy A (1955) Uber die Zerstorunskraft von Lawinen (On breaking force of avalanches). Schweizerische Bauzeitung 73: 212–285. (In German)Google Scholar
  49. Yifru AL (2014) Assessment of Rheological Models for Run-out Distance Modeling of Sensitive Clay Slides, Focusing on Voellmy Rheology. Master of Science thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  50. Zanchetta G, Sulpizio R, Pareschi MT, et al. (2004) Characteristics of May 5-6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): relationships to structural damage and hazard zonation. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 133 (1): 377–393. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-0273(03)00409-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zischinsky U (1969) Uber sackungen. Rock Mechanics 1 (1): 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Salvatici
    • 1
  • Stefano Morelli
    • 1
  • Veronica Pazzi
    • 1
  • William Frodella
    • 1
  • Riccardo Fanti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of FlorenceFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations