Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 14, Issue 9, pp 1839–1851 | Cite as

Spatial patterns and storage composition of woody debris in a natural secondary forest dominated by Pinus tabulaeformis on Loess Plateau, China

Article

Abstract

Woody debris (WD) is an important part of natural Pinus tabulaeformis mixed stands, and it affects the forest ecosystem stability and development. The WD spatial patterns are especially important structural characteristics that can provide insights into forest dynamics. In this paper, the WD storage, WD spatial patterns and WD associations among the main species were examined in the natural secondary forest on Loess Plateau in northwest China. Data were collected in a 1 ha (100 m × 100 m) permanent plot, and all the trees with a diameter at breast height of more than 3 cm were measured and stem-mapped. Ripley’s K functions from the spatial-point-pattern-analysis method were used to analyze the spatial distribution and associations. The results showed that: (1) The total storage of WD was 10.73 t/ha, fallen wood was the main source of WD, and the majority diameters were greater than 20 cm, and in intermediate levels of decay; (2) The overall spatial pattern was closely related to the spatial scale, which exhibited an aggregated pattern on a small scale, and a random pattern on a large scale. The spatial patterns of coarse woody debris also gradually transitioned from an aggregated pattern in fine scales to a random pattern in broader spatial scales, which matched the overall spatial pattern. The spatial intensity was gradually decreased with the increasing diameters, and increased with the decomposition classes; (3) The WD of Pinus tabulaeformis species was negatively associated with Betula platyphylla and Populus davidiana on a small scale but positively associated with these species on a large scale. The spatial pattern and interspecies relations were the results of long-term interactions between the natural secondary forest community and the surrounding natural environment. These findings would provide a scientific basis for the sustainable management and protection of natural secondary forest ecosystems on Loess Plateau.

Keywords

Spatial pattern Spatial association Storage Woody debris Natural secondary forest Loess Plateau 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Besag J (1977) Contribution to the discussion on Dr. Ripley’s paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series BStatistical Methodology 39: 193–195.Google Scholar
  2. Carmona RC, Juan JA, Juan CA, et al. (2002) Coarse woody debris biomass in successional and primary temperate forests in Chiloe Island, Chile. Forest Ecology and Management 164(1–3): 265–275. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01) 00602-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, Harmon ME (1992) Dynamic study of coarse woody debris in temperate forest ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 3(2): 99–104. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Chen H, Xu ZB (1991) Current, situation and tendency of coarse woody debris ecological research. Institute of applied ecology, Academia sinica 2(1): 89–91. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Clark DB, Clark DA, Brown S, et al. (2002) Stocks and flows of coarse woody debris across a tropical rain forest nutrient and topography gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 164(1–3): 237–248.http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00597-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delaney M, Browns S, Lugo AE, et al. (1998) The quantity and turnover of dead wood in permanent forest in six life zones of Venezuela. Biotropica 30(1): 2–11. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1998.tb00364.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edman M, Jonsson BG (2001) Spatial pattern of downed logs and wood-living fungi in an old-growth spruce forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 12(5): 609–620. http://doi.org/10.2307/3236900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feroz SM, Yoshimura K, Hagihara A (2008) Stand stratification and woody species diversity of a subtropical forest in limestone habitat in the northern part of Okinawa Island. Journal of Plant Research 121: 329–337. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-008-0162-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Getis A, Franklin J (1987) Second-order neighborhood analysis of mapped point pattern. Ecology 68(3): 473–477. http://doi.org/10.2307/1938452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greig-Smith P (1964) Quantitative plant ecology. Butter Worth and Co., Ltd., London, Grit Britain, 1964, 256.Google Scholar
  11. Hao ZQ, Zhang J, Song B, et al. (2007) Vertical structure and spatial association of dominant tree species in an old-growth temperate forest. Forest Ecology and Management 252(1–3): 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harmon ME, Franklin JF (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate Ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15Google Scholar
  13. Harmon ME, Franklin JF (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate Ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15: 133–302. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(03)34002-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He F, Wang DX, Zhang SZh, et al. (2011) Reserves of litter and woody debris of two main forests in Xiaolong Mountains, Gansu, China. Journal of Application and Environment 17(1): 46–50. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Hood IA, Beets PN, Kimberley MO, et al. (2004) Colonisation of podocarp coarse woody debris by decomposer basidiomycete fungi in an indigenous forest in the central North Island of New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management 196(2-3): 311325. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hou JH, Mi XC, Liu CR, et al. (2004) Spatial patterns and associations in a Quercus-Betula forest in northern China. Journal of Vegetation Science 15(3): 407–414. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02278.xGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller M, Palace M, Asner GP et al. (2004) Coarse woody debris in undisturbed and logged forests in the eastern Brazilian Amazon, Global. Change Biology 10(5): 784–795. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00770.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koukoulas S, Blackburn GA (2005) Spatial relationships between tree species and gap characteristics in broad-leaved deciduous woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 16(5): 587–596. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02400.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu YY, Jin GZ (2010) Spatial point pattern analysis for coarse woody debris in a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains, China. Acta ecology sinica 30(22): 6072–6081. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Moeur M (1993) Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem mapped data. Forest Science 39: 756–775.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer P (1999) Totholzuntersuchungen in nordwestdeuts chen Naturwadern: Methodik und erste Ergebnisse. European Journal of Forest Research 118(1): 167–180. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768985Google Scholar
  22. Müller-Using S, Bartsch N (2003) Totholzdynamik eines buchenbestandes (Fagus sylvatica L.) im solling. nachlieferung, ursache, und zersetzung von totholz. Allgemeine Forst Und Jagdzeitung, 174: 122–130. (In German)Google Scholar
  23. Parish R, Antos JA, Fortin MJ (1999) Stand development in an old growth subalpine forest in southern interior British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29(9): 1347−1356. http://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-29-9-1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedlar JH, Pearce JL, Venier LA et al. (2002) Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada, Forest Ecology and Management 158(1–3): 189–194. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00711-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rademacher C, Winter S (2003) Totholz im Buchen-Urwald: Generische Vorhersagen des Simulations modells before coarse woody debris zur Menge, ramlichen Verteilung und Verfvgbarkeit. European Journal of Forest Research 122: 337–357. (In German) http://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-003-0002-6Google Scholar
  26. Rejmanek M, Leps J (1996) Negative association can reveal interspecific competition and reversal of competitive hierarchies during succession. Oikos 76(1): 161–168. http://doi.org/10.2307/3545758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ripley D (1977) Modeling spatial pattern. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B) 3: 172–212.Google Scholar
  28. Rouvinen S, Kouki J (2002) Spatio temporal availability of dead wood in protected old-growth forests: a case study from boreal forests in eastern Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17(4): 317–329. http://doi.org/10.1080/02827580260138071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siitonen J, Martikainen P, Punttilac P, et al. (2000) Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 128(3): 211–225. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00148-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sollins P, Cline SP, Verhoeven T, et al. (1987) Patterns of log decay in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 1585–1595. http://doi.org/10.1139/x87-243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sollons P (1982) Input and decomposition of coarse woody debris in coniferous stands in western Oregon and Washington. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12: 18–28. http://doi.org/10.1139/x82-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Song ZW, Tang JW (2008) Coarse woody debris marls and its nutrients stock in tropical seasonal rain forest in Xishuangbanna. Chinese Journal of Ecology 27(12): 2033–2041. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Stevens V (1997) The Ecological Role of Coarse Woody Debris: an Overview of the Ecological Importance of CWD in BC Forests. Research Program, BC Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC, Canada Working Paper.Google Scholar
  34. Storry KA, Weldrick CK, Mews M, et al. (2006) Intertribal coarse woody debris: A spatial subsidy as shelteror feeding habitat forgastropods. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 66: 197–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, et al. (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Compute 7(1): 75–83. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018513 530268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tian P, Zhai JQ, Zhao GJ, Mu XM (2016) Dynamics of Runoff and Suspended Sediment Transport in a Highly Erodible Catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Land degradation &Development 27(3): 839–850. http://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL, Horn S, et al. (2004) Spatial and temporal patterns of beetles associated with coarse woody debris in managed bottomland hardwood forests. Forest Ecology and Management 199(2–3): 259–272. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. von Oheimb G, Westphal C, Härdtle W (2007) Diversity and spatio-temporal dynamics of dead wood in a temperate nearnatural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica). European Journal of Forest Research 126: 359–370. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0152-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan ER, Wang XH, Hang JJ (2005) Concept and classification of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystem. Acta Ecological Sinica 25(1): 158–167. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Yuan K, Cheng F, Zhao P, et al. (2014) Characteristics in coarse woody debris mediated by forest developmental stage and latest disturbances in a natural secondary forest of Pinus tabulaeformis. Acta Ecologica Sinica 34: 232–238. (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang HL, Yang WQ, Wang M, et al. (2015) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus storage of woody debris in headwater streams in an alpine forest in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River. Acta Ecological Sinica 36(7): 1–8. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ForestryNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.College of Economics & ManagementNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina

Personalised recommendations