Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 782–794 | Cite as

Factors affecting technical efficiency of small-scale apple farms in Balochistan Plateau, Pakistan

Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

In Balochistan, Agriculture is dominated by small-scale farmers and the apple production sector is confronted with the chronic constraint of low output per unit of input. Although some agricultural policies have been implemented in this province, studies on effectiveness and impacts of such policies over apple production and farmers’ performance are still limited. This study is an effort to bridge the research gap on this potential crop in the plateau by investigating technical and scale efficiency of 181 officially designated small-scale apple farmers in mountainous district Mastung in Balochistan; then explored factors that underlie differences in production inefficiency. A two-stage input-oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology was employed to evaluate technical and scale efficiency followed by truncated bootstrapped regression framework to analyze the correlative determinants to efficiency. Average technical and scale efficiencies of larger landholders were higher than medium and small landholders. Analysis indicated that there is still ample scope for inefficient sample farmers to reduce the input use by 33% without compromising the given yield level. Maximum contributions to the total input savings were from the use of urea, farm yard manure (FYM) and labor-use. Farmer’s experience, farm ownership, irrigation constraints, and farmer’s access to trainings, credit and extension services significantly affected apple farmers’ technical efficiency. Based on the findings of this study, strategies are suggested to enhancing efficiencies by farmers’ capacity development through effective extension services and trainings and provision of adequate credit.

Keywords

Small-scale apple farmers Technical efficiency Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Bootstrap Efficiency-improving resources Balochistan Plateau 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

11629_2016_3937_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (50 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 51 KB.

References

  1. Abatania LN, Hailu A, Mugera AW (2012) Analysis of farm household technical efficiency in northern Ghana using Bootstrap DEA. (Available online at:http://ageconsearch.umn. edu/bitstream/124211/2/2012AC%20Abatania%20CP.pdf, accessed on: 2014-04-21).Google Scholar
  2. Aneani F, Ofori-Frimpong K (2013) An analysis of yield gap and some factors of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) yields in Ghana. Sustainable Agriculture Research 2: 117–127.DOI: 10.5539/sar.v2n4p117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkin H, Colton R (1963) Tables for statisticians. Barnes and Noble, New York. pp 145–146Google Scholar
  4. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30: 1078–1092. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bindraban PS, Stoorvogel JJ, Jansen DM, et al. (2000) Land quality indicators for sustainable land management: Proposed method for yield gap and soil nutrient balance. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 81 (2): 103–112. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00184-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerdán-Infantes P, Maffioli A, Ubfal D (2008) The impact of agricultural extension services: The case of grape production in Argentina. (Available online at: http://www19.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2009/03159.pdf, accessed on: 2013-06-8).Google Scholar
  7. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decisionmaking units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429–444. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciaian P, Falkowski J, Kancs DA (2012) Access to credit, factor allocation and farm productivity. Agricultural Finance Review 72 (1): 22–47. DOI: 10.1108/00021461211222114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O'Donnell CJ, et al. (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science and Business Media, New York.pp 165–181.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data Envelopment Analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer Science and Business Media, New York. pp 87–91.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2011) Hand book on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer Science and Business Media, New York. pp 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dao G, Lewis P (2013) Technical efficiency of annual crop farms in Northern Vietnam. (Available online at: http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Managementand-Governance/_document/Australian-Conference-of-Economists/Technicalefficiency-of-annual-crop-farms-innorthern-Vietnam.pdf, accessed on 2014-03-28)Google Scholar
  13. Deininger K, Jin S (2006) Tenure security and land related investment: Evidence from Ethiopia. European Economic Review 50: 1245–1277. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis F (1996) Agriculture policies in developing countries. Cambridge University Press, New York. pp 152-170.Google Scholar
  15. Gang C, Zhenhua Q (2013) MaxDEA Pro 6.3 for Data Envelopment Analysis. Beijing Realworld Research and Consultation Company Ltd. Available online at: http://www.MaxDEA.cn.Google Scholar
  16. GoB (2011) Mastung-district development profile 2011. Planning & Development Department, Government of Balochistan, Quetta in Collaboration with UNICEF.Google Scholar
  17. GoB (2013) Development Statistics of Balochistan 2011-12. Bureau of Statistics, Planning and Development, Government of Balochistan, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  18. GoP (2013) Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  19. Heidari MD, Omid M, Mohammadi A (2012) Measuring productive efficiency of horticultural greenhouses in Iran: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (1): 1040–1045. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hussain A, Thapa GB (2012) Smallholders' access to agricultural credit in Pakistan. Food Security 4 (1): 73–85. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-012-0167-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khair SM, Mushtaq S, Culas RJ, et al. (2012) Ground water markets under the water scarcity and declining watertable conditions: The upland Balochistan region of Pakistan. Agriculture Systems 107: 21–32. DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kokkinou A (2012) An industry and country analysis of Technical Efficiency in the European Union, 1980-2005. PhD thesis, College of Social Sciences, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  23. Liu JS, Lu LYY, Lu WM, et al. (2013) Data envelopment analysis 1978-2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega 41 (1): 3–15. DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB (2009) Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34: 179–204. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magalhães MM, Lambais GBR, da-Silveira JMFJ (2013) Land reform and technical efficiency: Theory and panel data evidence from Brazil. In: 17th Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics (ISNIE), Florence, Italy. pp 1–55.Google Scholar
  26. Murtaza G (2010) Technical efficiency of horticulture farms in Balochistan, Pakistan: A stochastic production frontier analysis. Master thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  27. Murtaza G, Thapa GB (2015) Determinants of Yield Gap in Small-scale Apple Farms in Balochistan, Pakistan. Journal of Crop Improvement 29 (2): 196–227. DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2014.994054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Gómez-Limón JA, Reig-Martínez E (2011) Assessing farming eco-efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 1154–1164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piya S, Kiminami A, Yagi H (2012) Comparing the technical efficiency of rice farms in urban and rural areas: A case study from Nepal. Trends in Agricultural Economics 5: 48–60. DOI: tae.2012.48.60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poudel KL, Yamamoto N, Sugimoto Y, et al. (2011) Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in Nepal using DEA approach. In: 85th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society Warwick University, England.Google Scholar
  31. Reig-Martinez E, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2004) Analysing farming systems with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): Citrus farming in Spain. Agriculture Systems 82: 17–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2003.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rios AR, Shively GE (2005) Farm size and nonparametric efficiency measurements for coffee farms in Vietnam. (Available online at:http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/19159/1/sp05ri01.pdf, accessed on: 2012-08-14).Google Scholar
  33. SBP (2010) Document of definitions, Annual Report-Statistical Supplement. Karachi: Agricultural Credit Department, State Bank of Pakistan. pp: v-vi.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz TW (1964) Transforming traditional agriculture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Shah NA, Afzal M, Ahmed M, et al. (2011) Marketing of apple in Northern Balochistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27 (4): 617–624.Google Scholar
  36. Sial MH, Iqbal S, Sheikh AD (2012) Farm size -productivity relationship: Recent evidence from central Punjab Pakistan Economic and Social Review 50 (2): 139–162. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00091-0Google Scholar
  37. Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in twostage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics 136 (1): 31–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom. 2005.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thapa G, Gaiha R (2011) Smallholder farming in Asia and the Pacific: Challenges and opportunities. In: Paper presented at the IFAD Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture 24-25 January, 2011, Rome, Italy. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).pp 1–16Google Scholar
  39. Ullah A, Perret S (2014) Technical-and environmentalefficiency analysis of irrigated cotton-cropping systems in Punjab, Pakistan using Data Envelopment Analysis. Environmental Management 54 (2): 288–300. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0300-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Umanath M, Rajasekar DD (2013) Data Envelopment Analysis to estimate technical and scale efficiency of farms in Periyarvaigai irrigation system of Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 6 (10): 5331–5336.Google Scholar
  41. Wang L, Huo X, Kabir S (2013) Technical and cost efficiency of rural household apple production. China Agricultural Economic Review 5 (3): 391–411. DOI: 10.1108/CAER-08-2011-0087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yengoh G (2012) Determinants of yield differences in smallscale food crop farming systems in Cameroon. Agriculture & Food Security 1 (19): 1–17. DOI:10.1186/2048-7010-1-19Google Scholar
  43. Yengoh G, Ardö J (2014) Crop yield gaps in Cameroon. AMBIO 43 (2): 175–190. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-013-0428-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yilma T, Berger T (2006) Complementarity between irrigation and fertilizer technologies: A justification for increased irrigation investment in the less-favored areas of SSA. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 12-18, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Zongzhang L, Dingan L (2011) The impact of agricultural extension on technical efficiency of agricultural production in China, In: 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), IEEE. pp 446–450.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Disaster Management and Development StudiesUniversity of BalochistanQuettaPakistan
  2. 2.School of Environment, Resources and DevelopmentAsian Institute of Technology, Klong LuangPathumthaniThailand

Personalised recommendations