Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 9, pp 1598–1608 | Cite as

Influence of ginseng cultivation under larch plantations on plant diversity and soil properties in Liaoning Province, Northeast China

  • Wei-wei Liu
  • Mou-cheng LiuEmail author
  • Wen-hua Li
  • Fan-shun Zeng
  • Yi Qu
Article

Abstract

Currently, transforming the mode of forest management and developing multiple forest management practices are actively encouraged in China. As one forest management type, ginseng cultivation under larch plantations has been developed significantly in the east of Liaoning Province. However, research on the influence of the ecological environment for this mode of production is still deficient. Based on this, our study compares the plant diversity and soil properties in the ginseng cultivation under larch plantations (LG) with larch plantations (LP) and natural secondary forests (SF). First, we randomly selected three plots for each of the three stand types which have similar stand characteristics; then, we carried out a plant diversity survey and soil sampling in each of the nine plots. The results show that no significant difference was found in plant diversity between LG and LP, but the evenness of herbs was significantly lower in LG than LP. No obvious changes in soil physical properties were found in LG, but a significant decrease in most of the soil nutrient content was presented in LG. Furthermore, we found a correlation between plant diversity (H') and soil properties in the three kinds of stand types, especially between herbaceous plant diversity and soil properties. We conclude that ginseng cultivation under larch plantations has no obvious effect on plant diversity, except the herbaceous evenness. Soil fertility can be depleted significantly in LG, but physical structures are not affected. Moreover, maintaining the diversity of herbaceous plants and controlling the density of ginseng cultivation in LG by farmers are important for the ecological environment. Based on this study and its good comprehensive benefits and with the support of policy, we think this forest management type should be promoted moderately in the region.

Keywords

Forest management Ginseng cultivation Larch plantations Secondary forests Plant diversity Soil properties Changbai Mountain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beon MS, Park JH, Kang HM, et al. (2013) Geographic information system-based identification of suitable cultivation sites for wood-cultivated ginseng. Journal of Ginseng Research 37(4): 491–495. DOI: 10.5142/jgr.2013.37.491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen total. In: Sparks DL (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 3-chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison, USA. pp 1085–1121.Google Scholar
  3. Catt JA, Howse KR, Farina R, et al. (1998) Phosphorus losses from arable land in England. Soil Use and Management 14(s4): 168–174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1998.tb00636.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandler JL, McGraw JB (2015) Variable effects of timber harvest on the survival, growth, and reproduction of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) Forest Ecology and Management 344: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen HW, Yin MF, Liu N, et al. (2005) A study on community’s structure and characteristics of herbage layer planting ginsengs under forest in mountain areas in Eastern Liaoning. Journal of Northwest Forestry University 20(2): 61–63. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Cheng HT, Zhang YY, Zhang LX, et al. (2011) Changes of soil nutrients in ginseng under forest at different growth stages. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 27(8): 47–52. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Coleman CI, Hebert JH, Reddy P (2003) The effects of Panax ginseng on quality of life. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 28(1): 5–15. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2003.00467.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cromack K, Miller RE, Anderson HW, et al. (1999) Soil carbon and nutrients in a coastal Oregon Douglas-fir plantation with red alder. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63(1): 232–239. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300010034xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dezzeo N, Chacón N, Sanoja E, et al. (2004) Changes in soil properties and vegetation characteristics along a forest-savanna gradient in southern Venezuela. Forest Ecology and Management 200(s1-3): 183–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dybzinski R, Fargione JE, Zak DR, et al. (2008) Soil fertility increases with plant species diversity in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Oecologia 158(1): 85–93. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1123-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eskelinen, A, Stark S, Männistö M (2009) Links between plant community composition, soil organic matter quality and microbial communities in contrasting tundra habitats. Oecologia 161(1): 113–123. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1362-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang JY, Wang XP, Shen ZH, et al. (2009) Methods and protocols for plant community inventory. Biodiversity Science 17 (6): 533–548. (In Chinese). DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher R F, Dan B (2013) Forest Biogeochemistry. Ecology and Management of Forest Soils, Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, USA. pp 99–137.Google Scholar
  14. Fu BJ, Liu SL, Ma KM, et al. (2004) Relationships between soil characteristics, topography and plant diversity in a heterogeneous deciduous broad-leaved forest near Beijing, China. Plant and Soil 261(1): 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenniferm E, Prabashni R (2002) Effects of Panax ginseng on quality of life. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 36(3): 375–379. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191759Google Scholar
  16. Kim C, Choo GC, Cho HS, et al. (2015) Soil properties of cultivation sites for mountain-cultivated ginseng at local level. Journal of Ginseng Research 39(1): 76–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li D, Zhu LH, Li HB (1998) A preliminary study on understory plant diversity among several major forest types in the eastern mountain area of Liaoning. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology 6: 40–42. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Li WH, Lai SD (1994) Agroforestry in China. Science Press, Beijing, China. p. 187. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Li Y, Ying YX, Zhao DY, et al. (2012) Microbial community diversity analysis of Panax ginseng rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA method. Open Journal of Genetics 2(2): 95–102. DOI: 10.4236/ojgen.2012.22014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu SR, Innes J, Wei XH (2013) Shaping forest management to climate change: an overview. Forest Ecology and Management 300(4): 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma KP (1994) Measurement of biotic community diversity I. alpha diversity (Part 1). Chinese Biodiversity 2(3): 162–168. (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mlambo D, Nyathi P, Mapaure I (2005) Influence of Colophospermum mopane on surface soil properties and understorey vegetation in a southern African savanna. Forest Ecology and Management 212(s1-3): 394–404. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 -chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Inc, Madison, USA. pp 961–1010.Google Scholar
  24. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, et al. (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939: 1–19.Google Scholar
  25. Sang WG (2009) Plant diversity patterns and their relationships with soil and climatic factors along an altitudinal gradient in the middle Tianshan Mountain area, Xinjiang, China. Ecological Research 24(2): 303–314. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0507-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharpley AN, Smith SJ, Jones OR, et al. (1992) The transport of bioavailable phosphorus in agricultural runoff. Journal of Environmental Quality 21(1): 30–35. DOI: 10.2134/jeq1992.00472425002100010003xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silva DMD, Batalha MA (2008) Soil–vegetation relationships in cerrados under different fire frequencies. Plant and Soil 311: 87–96. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9660-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tang L, Dong SK, Liu SL, et al. (2015) The relationship between soil physical properties and alpine plant diversity on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Eurasian Journal of Soilence 4(2): 88–93. DOI: 10.18393/ejss.31228Google Scholar
  29. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21(2/3): 213–251. DOI: 10.2307/1218190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ying YX, Ding WL, Zhou YQ, et al. (2012) Influence of Panax ginseng continuous cropping on metabolic function of soil microbial communities. Chinese Herbal Medicines 4(4): 329–334. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6384.2012.04.011Google Scholar
  31. Youn YC (2009) Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: Cases in South Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 257(10): 2027–2034. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei-wei Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mou-cheng Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wen-hua Li
    • 1
  • Fan-shun Zeng
    • 3
  • Yi Qu
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Liaoning Academy of ForestryShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations