Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 11, pp 2028–2035 | Cite as

Evaluation of soil erodibility factor (k) for loess derived landforms of Kechik watershed in Golestan Province, North of Iran

  • Farshad KianiEmail author
  • Aboutaleb Ghezelseflo
Article
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

The technique proposed by Wischmeier & Smith for estimating the soil erodibility factor is among the most important methods in this regard. Given the high amounts of silt and lime content in loess soils of eastern parts of Golestan province in Iran, this study aims to evaluate the ability of Wischmeier & Smith index to estimate the soil erodibility of this region. Soil erodibility was first obtained by Wischmeier nomograph and then was compared with the actual values obtained by selecting six plots and then performing physical and chemical tests on these samples. Using the nomograph, Wischmeier index was calculated to be about 0.05-0.092 Mg h MJ−1 mm−1. The results showed that Wischmeier index was 182, 4.11, 6 and 0.35 times than actual value in field with half-hour rainfall, Fournier index, SWAT value with half-hour rainfall and SWAT value with Fournier index, respectively. Obtained results showed that erodibility estimated by Wischmeier & Smith index was higher than the actual measured value. Poor performance of this index in loess soils indicates the need for further research in this field.

Keywords

Soil erodibility Loess Wischmeier nomograph Iran 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angima SD, Scott DE, ONeill MK, et al. (2003) Soil erosion prediction using RUSLE for central Kenyan highland conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 97: 295–308. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00011-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouwer H (1986) Intake Rate: Cylinder Infiltrometer. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. In: Klutem A (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, 2nd Edition, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp 341–345.Google Scholar
  3. Castro CF, Logan TJ (1991) Liming effects on the stability and erodibility of some Brazilian Oxisols. Soil Science Society of American Journal 55: 1407–1413. DOI:10.2136/sssaj1991.036 15995005500050034xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charman PE, Murphy BW (2000) Soils (their properties and management). Second edition, Land and Water Conservation, New South Wales, Oxford press. pp 206–212.Google Scholar
  5. Chen M, Zhou F, Huang Y, et al. (1995) Study on the soil erodibility factor. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 9: 19–24. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Dolat Khahi M (2001) Assessment of The Relationship Between Soil Characteristics, Topography and Vegetation with Production of Loess Sediments in Kechik Watershed (Subbassin of Gorganroud). MSc Thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran, August 23. p 120.(In Persian)Google Scholar
  7. Duiker SW, Flanagan DC, Lal R (2001) Erodibility and infiltration characteristics of five major soils of southwest Spain. Catena 45: 103–121. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00145-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-swaify SA, Dangler EW (1977) Erodibilities of selected tropical soils in relation to structural and hydrologic parameters. In: Foster GR (Ed.), Soil Erosion Prediction and Control. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, USA, pp 105–114.Google Scholar
  9. Feiznia S, Ghayumian J, Khaje M (2005) Assessment of the effect of physical, chemical and climatic factors in the production of sediments caused by surface erosion of loess soils (case study: Golestan province). Research and Development on Natural Resources 66: 16–28. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  10. Gee Gw, Bauder JW (1980) Particle-size analysis. In: Klutem A (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Second edition, Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, Wsconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Ghaderi N, Ghodusi J (2005) Assessment of the soil erodibility in landforms of Taluoarchay watershed. Third National Conference on Erosion and Sedimentation Proceedings, Tehran, Iran, August 28-31. pp 367–372. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  12. Ghasemi A, Mohammadi J (2003) Study of spatial variation of soil erodibility, a case study in Cheghakhor watershed in Chaharmahal-e-Bakhtiyari province. Eighth Soil Science Congress of Iran Proceedings, Rasht. Iran, August 31-September 3. pp 864–865. In Persian)Google Scholar
  13. Ghorbani Vagheie H, Bahrami HA (2004) Evaluation of soil erodibility of soil erodibility variations in the USLE and the RUSLE models using GIS in soils of north east of Lorestan province. Third National Conference on Erosion and Sedimentation Proceeding, Tehran, Iran, August 28-31. pp 658–660. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  14. Hussein M, Kariem H, Othman A (2007) Predicting soil erodibility in northern Iraq natural runoff data. Soil and Tillage Research 94: 220–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.07. 012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Igwe CA (2005) Erodibility in relation to water-dispersible clay for some of soil eastern Nigeria. Land Degradation and Development 16(1): 87–96. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemper WD, Rosenau RC (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I: Physical Analysis. SSSA. Madison, WI, USA. pp 425–442.Google Scholar
  17. Kirkby MJ, Morgan RP (1980) Soil Erosion. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA. pp 150–179.Google Scholar
  18. Miller RW, Gardiner DT (1998) Soils in Our Environment. 8th ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., USA. pp 25–38.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson RE (1982) Carbonate and gypsum. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Page AL (Ed.), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Orts JW, SoJka RE, Glenn GM (2000) Biopolymer additives to reduce erosion-induced soil losses during irrigation. Industrial Crops and Products 11: 19–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00030-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Second ed. Agronomy Monographs, 9. ASA-SSA, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Refahi H (2003) Water Erosion and Control, Tehran University Press, Tehran, Iran. p 325. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  23. Rejman J (1992) A rainfall simulation experiment on a brown soil developed from loess of the Lublin Upland: I. Erodibility of soils with different levels of erosion. Polish Journal of Soil Science 25: 17–23.Google Scholar
  24. Rosewell CJ (1992) The erodibility of five soils in New South Wales. In: Hamilton GJ, Howes KM, Attwater R (Eds.), Fifth Australian Soil Conservation Conference Proceedings, Perth, Australia, September 25-29. pp 112–115.Google Scholar
  25. Sabah A, Gorji M, Refahi H, Shahuee’e S (1999) Assessment of the relationship between soil erodibility (K) and aggregates stability in major soil series of Qazvin plain. Iran’s Agricultural Science Journal 3: 13–21. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  26. Salehi MH, Hosseinifard J, Rafieiolhossaini M (2005) The effect of different land uses on some soil quality indices in Zagros region, Iran. International Conference on Human Impacts on Soil quality Attributes Proceeding. Isfahan, Iran, September 12-16, pp 235–237. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  27. Santos FL, Reis JL, Martins OC, Castanheria NL, Serralherio RP (2003) Comparative assessment of infiltration, runoff and erosion of sprinkler irrigation soils. Biosystems Engineering, 86: 355–364. DOI: 10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00135-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwab GO, Frevert RK, Edminster TW, et al. (1981) Soil and Water Conservation Engineering. Third edition, John Willey and Sons, New York, USA. pp 100–103.Google Scholar
  29. Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K (2000) Soil structure and soil organic matter: II. A normalized stability index and the effect of mineralogy. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64(3): 1042–1049. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6431042xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Torri D, Poessen J, Borselli L (1997) Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using global dataset. Catena 31: 1–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(97)00036-210. 1016/S0341-8162(97)00036-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaezi A, Bahrami H, Sadeghi S, Mahdian M (2007) Assessment of factors affecting the soil erodibility in calcareous soils based on USLE. Agricultural Science and Natural Resources Journal 5: 12–35. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  32. Wall GJ, Dickinson WT, Rudra RP, etal (1988) Seasonal soil erodibility variation in southwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 68(2): 417–424. DOI: 10.4141/cjss88-038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: Guide to Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbook No. 537. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Wischmeier WH. Mannering JV (1965) Effect of organic matter content of the soil on infiltration. Soil and Water Conservation Journal 4: 150–152.Google Scholar
  35. Sun YB, Lu HY, An ZS (2000) Grain size distribution of quartz isolated from Chinese loess /paleosol. Chinese Science Bulletin 45(24): 2296–2298. DOI: 10.1007/BF02886372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang K, Li S, Peng W, et al. (2004) Erodibility of agricultural soils on the loess plateau of China. Soil and Tillage Research 76: 157–165.DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2003.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Soil ScienceGorgan university of agricultural sciences and natural resourcesGorganIran
  2. 2.Natural resources organization of Golestan provinceGorganIran

Personalised recommendations