Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 9, pp 1675–1687 | Cite as

Changing human-environment interactions in medium mountains: the Apuseni Mts (Romania) as a case study

  • Tamás TelbiszEmail author
  • Zoltán Imecs
  • László Mari
  • Zsolt Bottlik


The study of human-environment relationships in mountain areas is important for both theoretical and practical reasons, as many mountain areas suffer similar problems, such as depopulation, unemployment and natural hazards. Medium mountains constitute a special case within mountains, because they are more populated but less attractive as tourist destinations than high mountains. In this context, the Apuseni Mts (Romania) are considered as a case study. In this paper, we apply GIS-based, quantitative methods to characterize the strength and dynamics of human-environment interactions, taking into consideration some environmental factors (elevation, relative height, slope, river distance, lithology, land cover, natural attractions) as well as historical population and recent tourism data. We found that population density has strong (r 2>0.8) relationships with all relief factors (elevation, relative height, slope, river distance), and that best-fit functions are nonlinear. We outlined the varying demographic scenarios by elevation zones and interpreted the historically switching sign of population change versus elevation relationship. We demonstrated that lithology also has an impact on the spatial distribution of population, although it is not independent from the relief effect. The land cover of the mainly cultural landscape is very strongly correlated with relief parameters (especially slope), which suggests good adaptation. We pointed out the dominance of karst objects in the natural tourism potential of the Apuseni Mts and also explored further components of real tourism (spas, heritage, towns). Finally, we concluded that the environmental settings investigated do in fact constrain the spatial framework of society, but socio-economic changes in history can be explained from the side of society, which conforms to the theory of cultural possibilism.


Human-environment relations Apuseni Mountains Geographical information system (GIS) Possibilism Tourism Karst 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrudan I, Turnock D (1999) A rural development strategy for the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. GeoJournal 46: 319–336. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1006937023451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botan CN (2010) Ţara Moţilor. Studiu de geografie regionala (The Land of the Moţi. Study of Regional Geography). Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca. p 527.Google Scholar
  3. Botan CN, Ilovan OR (2006) Trends of Industrial Reconversion in the Land of the Moţi. Romanian Review of Regional Studies 2(1): 113–120.Google Scholar
  4. Brondízio ES, Moran EF (eds., 2013) Human-Environment Interactions: Current and Future Directions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Scientific Publishers. p 434. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4780-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büttner Gy, Feranec J, Jaffrain G, et al. (2004) The CORINE Land Cover 2000 Project. EARSeL eProceedings 3(3): 331–346.Google Scholar
  6. Büttner Gy, Kosztra B, Sousa A, Steenmans C (2010) CLC2006: Mapping Land Cover of Europe under GMES 26-34. In: Kalaitzidis C, Manakos I (eds.) Imagin[e, g] Europe: Proceedings of the 29th Symposium of the European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories, Chania, Greece. p 460. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-494-8-26Google Scholar
  7. Buza M, Dimen L, Pop G, et al. (2001) Environmental protection in the Apuseni Mountains: The role of Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations (ENGOs). GeoJournal 54: 631–653. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1021757431777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castelein A, Dinh TTV, Mekouar MA, et al. (2006) Mountains and the Law. Emerging Trends. FAO Legislative Study 75, Rev. 1. Rome: FAO of the UN. p 91.Google Scholar
  9. Cocean P (2001) Environment Threats in Romanian Karst. 13th International Congress of Speleology, Brasilia DF: 613–617.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen JE, Small C (1998) Hypsographic demography: The distribution of human population by altitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95: 14009–14014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Constantin V, Ştefănescu L, Kantor CM (2015) Vulnerability assessment methodology: A tool for policy makers in drafting a sustainable development strategy of rural mining settlements in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Environmental Science & Policy (52): 129–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond J (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W.W. Norton & Company, NewYork, USA. p 460.Google Scholar
  13. Drăgan M. (2010) Multi-scale Analysis of the Demographic Evolution in the Apuseni Mountains between 1880 and 2008. Romanian Review of Regional Studies 6(1): 57–66.Google Scholar
  14. Judkins G, Smith M, Keys E (2008) Determinism within human-environment research and the rediscovery of environmental causation. The Geographical Journal 174 (1): 17–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00265.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kienzle S (2004) The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives. Transactions in GIS 8(1): 83–111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00169.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiernan K (2011) Challenges for environmentally sustainable development of natural resources in the Nam Ou Karst, Northern Laos. Acta Carsologica 40(2): 341–355. DOI: 10.3986/ac.v40i2.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koszegi M, Bottlik Zs, Telbisz T, Mari L (2015) Human-environment relationships in modern and postmodern geography. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64: 87–99. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.64.2.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mao X, Meng J, Wang Q (2014) Tourism and land transformation: a case study of the Li River Basin, Guilin, China. Journal of Mountain Science 11(6): 1606–1619. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2871-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meybeck M, Green P, Vörösmarty C (2001) A new typology for mountains and other relief classes: an application to global continental water resources and population distribution. Mountain Research and Development 21(1): 34–45. DOI: 10.1659/0276-4741(2001)021[0034: ANTFMA]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milošević MV, Milivojević M, Ćalić J (2010) Spontaneously abandoned settlements in Serbia, Part 1. Journal of the Geographical Institute Cvijić SASA 60(2): 39–57. DOI: 10.2298/IJGI1002039MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milošević MV, Milivojević M, Ćalić J (2011) Spontaneously abandoned settlements in Serbia, Part 2. Journal of the Geographical Institute CvijiĆ SASA 61(2): 25–35. DOI: 10.2298/IJGI1102025MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orăşeanu I, Iurkiewicz A (eds., 2010) Karst Hydrogeology of Romania, Belvedere, Oradea. p 443.Google Scholar
  23. Pantic M (2015): Delineation of mountains and mountain areas in Europe–a planning approach. Journal of the Geographical Institute CvijiĆ 65(1): 43–58. DOI: 10.2298/IJGI1501043PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patterson LA, Doyle MW (2011) Hypsographic demography across scale. Professional Geographer 63(4): 514–529. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2011.578534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. PejnoviĆ D, HusanoviĆ-PejnoviĆ D (2008) Causes and consequences of demographic development in the territory of Velebit Nature Park, 1857-2001. Periodicum Biologorum 110(2): 195–204.Google Scholar
  26. Price LW (1986): Mountains and Man. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA. p 507.Google Scholar
  27. Rabus B, Eineder M, Roth A, Bamler R (2003) The shuttle radar topography mission–a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar, Photogramm. Remote Sensing 57: 241–262. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00124-7Google Scholar
  28. Ruşdea E, Reif A, Povară I, et al. (eds., 2005) Perspektiven für eine traditionelle Kulturlandschaft in Osteuropa (Ergebnisse eines inter-und transdisziplinären, partizipativen Forschungsprojekt im Apuseni-Gebirge in Rumänien). Institut für Landespflege, Freiburg im Breisgau. p 401.Google Scholar
  29. SimiĆ, S, MilovanoviĆ B, JojiĆ-GlavonjiĆ T (2014) Theoretical model for the identification of hydrological heritage sites. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 9(4): 19–30.Google Scholar
  30. Sluyter A (2003) Neo-environmental determinism, intellectual damage control, and nature/society science. Antipode 35(4): 813–817. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-8330.2003.00354.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Small C, Cohen JE (2004) Continental physiography, climate and the global distribution of human population. Current Anthropology 45(2): 269–277. DOI: 10.1086/382255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Song G, Li Z, Bao Y, et al. (2007) Spatial distribution regularity and influence factors of population density in the LRGR. Chinese Science Bulletin 52(2): 90–97. DOI: 10.1007/s11434-007-7027-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Surd V, Turnock D (2000) Romania’s Apuseni Mountains: safeguarding a cultural heritage. GeoJournal 50: 285–304. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1007170018729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tătar CF (2013) Identity encounters. Host-guest interactions in the land of Moti (Romania). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 11(1): 66–74.Google Scholar
  35. Telbisz T, Bottlik Zs, Mari L, et al. (2014) The impact of topography on social factors, a case study of Montenegro. Journal of Mountain Sciences 11(1): 131–141. DOI: 10.1007/S11629-012-2623-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Telbisz T, Bottlik Zs, Mari L, et al. (2015) Exploring relationships between karst terrains and social features by the example of Gömör-Torna Karst (Hungary-Slovakia). Acta Carsologica 44(1): 121–137. DOI: 10.3986/ac.v44i1.1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Varga EÁ (2002) Erdély etnikai és felekezeti statisztikája 1850-2002 (Ethnic and religion statistics of Transylvania 1850-2002). I-V. Pro-Print Kiadó, Csíkszereda. Available online at: http: // (Accessed on 30 July 2015)Google Scholar
  38. Zhang C, Day M, Li W (2003) Landuse and land cover change in the Lunan Stone Forest, China. Acta Carsologica 32(2): 161–174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamás Telbisz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zoltán Imecs
    • 2
  • László Mari
    • 1
  • Zsolt Bottlik
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical GeographyEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of Geography in HungarianBabeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania
  3. 3.Department of Regional ScienceEötvös UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations