Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 939–946 | Cite as

Hydro-hypsometric analysis of tropical river basins, Southwest Coast of India using geospatial technology

  • Gopinath GirishEmail author
  • Ambili Gopalan Kamalamma
  • N. P. Jesiya
  • Kuriachan Lemoon
Article

Abstract

The key aspect in planning and management of water resources is to analyze the runoff potential and erosion status of the river basin. For the detailed investigation of hydrological response, freely available Cartosat-1 (IRS-P5) data was used for the preparation of digital elevation model (DEM). The runoff potential and type of erosive process of 22 river basins originating in the global biodiversity hotspot of Western Ghats, was inferred through hypsometric analysis. Several parameters like Hypsometric integral (HI), maximum concavity (Eh), coordinates of slope inflection point (I) given by a* and h* and normalized height of hypsometric curve (h) were extracted from the hypsometric curves and used for understanding the hydrological responses. From the hypsometric curves, the landform evolution processes were inferred. Contribution of diffusive and fluvial processes in slope degradation of the river basins was understood. Basins with lesser area (<100 km2) were found to have a positive correlation between hypsometric integral and basin area, whereas for large basins no such correlation exists. Based on the study, river basins can be prioritized for the appropriate conservation measures.

Keywords

Hypsometry Runoff potential Erosion status Cartosat-1 data River Basins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dowling TI, Richardson DP, O’Sullivan A, et al. (1998) Application of the hypsometric integral and other terrain -based metrics as indicators of catchment health: a preliminary analysis. CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia. Technical Report 20/98.Google Scholar
  2. Gopinath G, Swetha TV, Ashitha MK (2014) Elicitation of erosional signature of a tropical river basin with highresolution stereo data. Applied Geomatics 6(3): 149–157. DOI: 10.1007/s12518-014-0127-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Government of India (2013) Report of the High Level Working Group on Western Ghats. Volume I. Ministry of Environment and Forests, 15 April 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Liu JT, Wang AH, Wei Y, et al. (2015) Analyzing the influence of geomorphologic structure factors on runoff characteristics of catchments. Advances in Water Science 26(5): 631–638. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Khadri SFR, Kokate NR (2015) Hypsometric Analysis of the Morna River basin, Akola District, Maharashtra, India. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication 3(2): 87–92.Google Scholar
  6. Kusre BC (2013) Hypsometric Analysis and Watershed Management of Diyung Watershed in North Eastern India. Journal Geological Society of India 82: 262–270. DOI: 10.1007/s12594-013-0148-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin Z, Oguchi T (2004) Drainage density, slope angle, and relative basin position in Japanese bare lands from highresolution DEMs. Geomorphology 63(34): 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marani M, Eltahir E, Rinaldo A (2001) Geomorphic controls on regional baseflow. Water Resources Research 37(10): 2619–2630. DOI: 10.1029/2000WR000119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Markose VJ, Jayappa KS (2011) Hypsometric analysis of Kali River Basin, Karnataka, India, using geographic information system. Geocarto International 26(7): 553–568. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2011.608438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ramu B, Mahalingam B (2012) Hypsometric Properties of drainage basins in Karnataka using geographical information system. New York Science Journal 5(12): 156–158. DOI: 10.7537/marsnys051212.25Google Scholar
  11. Ritter DF, Kochel RC, Miller JR (2002) Process geomorphology, McGraw Hill, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Rogelis MC, Werner M (2014) Regional debris flow susceptibility analysis in mountainous peri-urban areas through morphometric and land cover indicators. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14(11): 3043–3064. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-3043-2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sajinkumar KS, Anbazhagan S, Pradeepkumar AP, et, al (2011) Weathering and landslide occurrences in parts of Western Ghats, Kerala. Journal of the Geological Society of India 78(3): 249–257. DOI: 10.1007/s12594-011-0089-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simon A, Mohankumar K (2004) Spatial variability and rainfall characteristics of Kerala, Journal of Earth System Science 113(2): 211–221. DOI: 10.1007/BF02709788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Singh O (2009) Hypsometry and erosion proneness: a case study in the lesser Himalayan Watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 8(2): 53–59.Google Scholar
  16. Singh O, Sarangi A (2008) Hypsometric analysis of the lesser Himalayan watersheds using geographical information system. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 36(3): 148–154.Google Scholar
  17. Singh O, Sarangi A, Sharma M.C. (2008) Hypsometric integral estimation methods and its relevance on erosion status of north-western Lesser Himalayan Watersheds. Water Resources Management 22(11): 1545–1560. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-008-9242-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sinha-Roy S (2009) Polyparametric approach to groundwater recharge capability assessment: an example from Rajasthan. Workshop on Water Scenario, Efficient Use and Management in Rajasthan, Central Groundwater Board, Western Region, Jaipur, India. pp 34–43.Google Scholar
  19. Sinha-Roy S (2002) Hypsometry and landform evolution: a case study in the Banas drainage basin, Rajasthan with implications for Aravalli uplift. Journal of the geological society of India 60(1): 7–26.Google Scholar
  20. Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometry (Area-Altitude) analysis of erosional topography, Bull Geol Soc Am 63(11): 1117–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vanderwaal JA, Ssegane H (2013) Dopolynomials adequately describe the hypsometry of monadnock phase watersheds? Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49(6): 1485–1495. DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vivoni ER, Di Beneditto F, Grimaldi S, et al. (2008) Hypsometric control on surface and subsurface runoff. Water Resources Research 44(12): 181–198. DOI: 10.1029/2008WR006931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Willgoose G, Hancock G (1998) Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23(7): 611–623. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199807)23:7<611:: AID-ESP872>3.0.CO;2-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang HY, Shi ZH, Fang NF, Guo MH (2015) Linking watershed geomorphic characteristics to sediment yield: Evidence from the Loess Plateau of China. Geomorphology 234: 19–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gopinath Girish
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ambili Gopalan Kamalamma
    • 1
  • N. P. Jesiya
    • 1
  • Kuriachan Lemoon
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Water Resources Development and ManagementKeralaIndia

Personalised recommendations