Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 69–82 | Cite as

Anthropogenic disturbances and their impact on vegetation in Western Himalaya, India

  • Zubair A. MalikEmail author
  • Rajiv Pandey
  • Ajay Ballabh Bhatt


The present study assesses anthropogenic disturbances and their impacts on the vegetation in Western Himalaya, India on the basis of various disturbance parameters such as density, Total Basal Cover (TBC) of cut stumps, lopping percentage and grazing intensities. On the basis of canopy cover and frequency of disturbances (%), the studied forests were divided into highly disturbed (HD), moderately disturbed (MD) and least disturbed (LD) categories. The HD forests had the lowest canopy cover, lowest density and lowest TBC and the LD had the highest canopy cover, highest density and highest TBC. The MD forests occupied the intermediate position with respect to these parameters. Species richness was least in HD forests, highest in one of the MD forests while LD forest occupied an intermediate position. The percentage of regenerating species was lowest (54%) in HD and highest (72%) in MD. The density of seedlings and saplings was higher in one of the MD forests as compared to HD and LD. We concluded that the moderate disturbances do not affect the vegetation adversely; however the increased degree of disturbance causes loss in plant diversity; affects regeneration and changes community characteristics. Construction of hydroelectric projects at various places in the study area was found to be one of the most important sources of anthropogenic disturbances in addition to the routine anthropogenic disturbances like grazing, fuelwood collection and fodder extraction. If all proposed dams in the Indian Himalaya are constructed combined with weak national environmental impact assessment and implementation, it will result in a significant loss of species. Therefore, various agents of disturbances should be evaluated in cumulative manner and any developmental activities such as hydropower projects, which trigger various natural and anthropogenic disturbances, should be combined with proper cumulative environmental impact assessment and effective implementation to minimise the anticipated loss of vegetation.


Human impact Species diversity Tree regeneration Conservation management Hydroelectric project Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhat JA, Kumar M, Negi AK, Todaria NP (2012) Anthropogenic pressure along an altitudinal gradient in a protected area of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Environment and Research Development 7: 62–65.Google Scholar
  2. Bhuyan P, Khan ML, Tripathi RS (2003) Tree diversity and population structure in undisturbed and human-impacted stands of tropical wet evergreen forest in Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalayas, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1753–1773. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023619017786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brokaw N (1998) Fragments past, present and future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 382–383. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01429-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin III FS, Erica S, Zavaleta VTE, Rosamond LN, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Sanndra L, Osvaldo ES, Hobbie SE, Michelle C, Sandra D (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234–24. DOI: 10.1038/35012241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. High diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science 199: 1302–1310. DOI: 10.1126/science.199.4335.1302Google Scholar
  6. Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK (2012) Fodder banks can reduce women drudgery and anthropogenic pressure from forests of Western Himalaya. Current Science 103: 763.Google Scholar
  7. Glatzel G (1999). Historic forest use and its possible implication to recently accelerated tree growth in Central Europe. In Karjalainen T, Spieker H, Laroussine, O. (eds.) Causes and consequences of accelerated tree growth in Europe. Vol 27. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute. pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
  8. Grumbine RE, Pandit MK (2013) Threats from India’s Himalayas dams. Science 339: 36–37. DOI: 10.1126/science. 1227211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartshorn GS (1980). Neotropical forest dynamics. Biotropica 12: 23–30. DOI: 10.2307/2388152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Houehanou TD, GleleKakai R L, Assogbadjo AE, Kindomihou V, Houinato M, Wittig R, Sinsin BA (2012) Change in the woody floristic composition, diversity and structure from protected to unprotected savannahs in Pendjari Biosphere Reserve (Benin, West Africa). African Journal of Ecology 1–8. DOI: 10.1111/aje.12046Google Scholar
  11. Kadavul K, Parthasarthy N (1999) Structure and composition of woody species in tropical semi evergreen forest of Kalrayan Hills, Eastern Ghats, India. Tropical Ecology 40: 247–260.Google Scholar
  12. Kala CP, Rawat GS (1999) Effects of livestock grazing on the species diversity and biomass production in the alpine meadows of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology 40: 69–74.Google Scholar
  13. Khurana P (2007) Tree layer analysis and regeneration in tropical dry deciduous forest of Hastinapur. Indian Journal of Tropical Biodiversity 16(1): 43–50.Google Scholar
  14. Krishnankutty N, Chandrasekaran S, Jeyakumar G, et al. (2006) Evaluation of disturbances in a tropical dry deciduous forest of Alagar hill (eastern ghats), South India. Tropical Ecology 47: 47–55.Google Scholar
  15. Kumar R, Shahabuddin G (2005) Effects of biomass extraction on vegetation structure, diversity and composition of forest in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Environmental Conservation 32, 248–259. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892905002316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Makana JR, Thomas SC (2006) Impacts of selective logging and agricultural clearing on forest structure, floristic composition and diversity, and timber tree regeneration in the Ituri Forest, Democratic Republic of Congo. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 1375–1397. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-5397-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malik ZA, Bhatt AB (2015) Regeneration status of tree species and survival of their seedlings in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjoining areas in Western Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology (In Press)Google Scholar
  18. Malik ZA, Hussain A, Iqbal K, Bhatt AB (2014a) Species richness and diversity along the disturbance gradient in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjoining areas in Garhwal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Current Research 6 (12): 10918–10926.Google Scholar
  19. Malik ZA, Bhat JA, Bhatt AB (2014b) Forest resource use pattern in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its fringe areas (a case study from Western Himalaya, India). Energy Policy 67: 138–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malik ZA (2014) Phytosociological behavoiur, anthropogenic disturbances and regeneration status along an altitudinal gradient in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS) and its adjoining areas. Ph. D Thesis, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar Uttarakhand. p 218.Google Scholar
  21. Mani MS (1974) Ecology and Biogeography of India. Junk Publishers: The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marciala NR, Espinosab MG, Linerac GW (2001) Anthropogenic disturbance and tree diversity in Montane Rain Forests in Chiapas, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 311–326. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00639-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mishra BP, Tripathi RS, Tripathi OP, Pandey HN (2003) Effect of disturbance on the regeneration of four dominant and economically important woody species in a broad-leaved subtropical humid forest of Meghalaya, northeast India. Current Science 84: 1449–1453.Google Scholar
  24. Murali KS, Uma Shankar, Ganeshaih KN, Umashaanker R, Bawa KS (1996) Extraction of nontimber forest products in the forest of Bilgiri Rangan Hill, India, 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure and species composition. Economic Botany 50: 252–269. DOI: 10.1007/BF02907329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pandit MK, Grumbine RE (2012) Potential effects of ongoing and proposed hydropower development on terrestrial biological diversity in the Indian Himalaya. Conservation Biology 26: 1061–1071. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pandit MK, Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Bhaskar A, Brook BW (2007) Unreported yet massive deforestation driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 153–163. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-006-9038-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parthasarthy N, Karthikeyan R (1997) Plant biodiversity inventory and conservation of two tropical dry evergreen forests on the Coromandel Coast, South India. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 1063–1083. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018328016810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parthasarthy N, Sethi P (1997). Tree and liana species diversity and population structure in a tropical dry evergreen forest in south India. Tropical Ecology 38:19–30.Google Scholar
  29. Pattanayak S, Sills EO, Mehta AD, Kramer RA (2003) Local uses of parks: uncovering patterns of household production from forests of Siberut, Indonesia. Conservation and Society 1: 209–222.Google Scholar
  30. Pei SJ (2001) Ethnobotanical approaches of traditional medicine studies: Some experiences from Asia. Pharmaceutical Biology 39: 74–79. DOI: 10.1076/phbi.39.s1. 74.0005Google Scholar
  31. Pettit NE, Raymond FH, Philip GL (1995) Grazing in remnant woodland vegetation: changes in species composition and life form groups. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 121–130. DOI: 10.2307/3236263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prasad S (2010) Population structure and regeneration status in relation to different disturbance level along altitudinal gradient in natural oak (Quercus leucotrichophora) forests of Garhwal Himalaya. Ph. D thesis, H.N.B Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal Uttarakhand. p. 215.Google Scholar
  33. Rana N, Sati SP, Sundriyal YP, Doval MM, Juyal N (2007) Socio-economic and environmental implications of the hydroelectric projects in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 4: 344–353. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-007-0344-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rao P, Barik SK, Pandey HN, Tripathi RS (1990). Community composition and tree population structure in a sub-tropical broadleaved forest along a disturbance gradient. Vegetatio 88:151–162. DOI: 10.1007/BF00044832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rawal RS, Gairola S, Dhar U (2012) Effects of disturbance intensities on vegetation patterns in Oak forests of Kumaun, West Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Science 9:157–165. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-012-2029-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rijal A, Meilby H (2012) Is the life supporting capacity of forests in the lower Mid Hills of Nepal threatened? Forest Ecology and Management 238: 35–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roder W, Gratzer G, Wangdi K (2002). Cattle grazing in the conifer forests of Bhutan. Mountain Research and Development 22: 368–374. DOI: 10.1659/0276-4741(2002) 022[0368:CGITCF]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruger N, Gutierrez AG, Kissling WD, Armesto JJ, Huth A (2007) Ecological impacts of different harvesting scenarios for temperate evergreen rain forest in southern Chile–a simulation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 252: 52–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saberwal VK (1996). Pastoral politics: gaddi grazing, degradation and biodiversity conservation in Himachal Pradesh, India. Conservation Biology 10: 741–749. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030741.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sagar R, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2003) Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India. Forest Ecology and Management 186: 61–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00235-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salick J, Zhendong F, Byg A (2009) Eastern Himalayan alpine plant ecology, Tibetan ethnobotany, and climate change. Global Environmental Change 19: 147–155. DOI: 10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2009.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sathyakumar S, Prasad SN, Rawat GS, Johnsingh AJT (1993) Conservation status of Himalayan Musk deer and livestock impacts in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Himalaya. In: Pangtey YPS, Rawal R, (eds.), High altitude of the Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan Nainital, India. pp 240–245.Google Scholar
  43. Sati SP, Sundriyal YP, Rana N, Dangwal S (2011) Recent landslides in Uttarakhand: nature’s fury or human folly. Current Science 100: 1617–1620.Google Scholar
  44. Sati, SP, Gahalaut, VK (2013) The fury of the floods in the north-west Himalayan region: the Kedarnath tragedy. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 4 (3): 193–201. DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2013.827135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saxena AK, Pandey U, Singh JS (1978) On the ecology of Oak forest in Nainital hills, Kumaun Himalaya. In: Singh JS and Gopal B (eds.), Glimpses of Ecology Jaipur International Scientific Publication. pp. 167–180.Google Scholar
  46. Saxena AK, Singh JS (1984) Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest, associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetatio 58: 61–69. Available online at: (Accessed on 23 March, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sheil D (1999) Tropical forest diversity, environmental change and species augmentation: After the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 851–860. DOI: 10.2307/3237310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shrestha KB, Maren IE, Arneberg E, et al. (2013) Effect of anthropogenic disturbance on plant species diversity in oak forests in Nepal, Central Himalaya. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 9: 21–29. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2012.749303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh G (2008) Diversity of vascular plants in some parts of Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary (Western Himalaya). Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University Nainital. p. 191.Google Scholar
  50. Singh JS, Singh SP (1992) Forests of Himalaya: structure, functioning and Impact of management. Gyanodaya Prakashan: Nainital, India.Google Scholar
  51. Singh JS, Singh SP, Pam J (1988) Fodder and Fuelwood resources of Central Himalaya: problems and solutions. Project report, Planning commission, GOI, New Delhi, pp. 159.Google Scholar
  52. Singh MP, Vishwakarma V (1997) Forest Environment and Biodiversity, pp 47. (Daya Publishing House Delhi).Google Scholar
  53. Singh V, Dasgupta S, Jhaldiyal V, Chauhan, DS, Todaria NP (2011) Diversity pattern of vegetation in and around proposed Kotlibhel hydroelectric project along the Alaknanda River in Garhwal Himalaya (India). iForest 4: 38–43. DOI: 10.3832/ifor0557-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh, JS (2006) Sustainable development of Indian Himalayan Region: Linking ecological and economic concern. Current Science 90(6): 784–788.Google Scholar
  55. Thakur AK, Singh G, Singh S, et al. (2011) Impact of pastoral practices on forest cover and regeneration in the outer fringes of Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Himalaya. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing 39: 127–134. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-011-0079-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thonicke K, Venevsky S, Sitch S, et al. (2001) The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Global Ecology and Biogeography 10: 661–677. DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001. 00175.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. UNEP (2001) India: State of the Environment—2001. United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  58. Uniyal P, Pokhriyal P, Dasgupta S (2010) Plant diversity in two forest types along the disturbance gradient in Dewalgarh Watershed, Garhwal Himalaya. Current Science 98: 938–943.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zubair A. Malik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajiv Pandey
    • 2
  • Ajay Ballabh Bhatt
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecology Laboratory, Department of Botany and MicrobiologyHNB Garhwal University Srinagar (Garhwal)UttarakhandIndia
  2. 2.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesHNB Garhwal University Srinagar (Garhwal)UttarakhandIndia

Personalised recommendations