Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 193–202 | Cite as

Case study of debris flow disaster scenario caused by torrential rain on Kiyomizu-dera, Kyoto, Japan - using Hyper KANAKO system

  • Kana NakataniEmail author
  • Satoshi Hayami
  • Yoshifumi Satofuka
  • Takahisa Mizuyama


This paper presents debris-flow numerical simulations using the Hyper KANAKO system, developed by the authors. The system uses the debris flow simulator KANAKO 2D equipped with a graphical user interface (GUI); hence, a user can easily produce appropriate landform data for simulations using standard laser profiler data, and visualize the results using a GIS. Hyper KANAKO was applied to the streams around Kiyomizu-dera in Kyoto, Japan. Kiyomizu-dera is a famous temple in Japan which is visited by numerous tourists throughout the year. We simulated a disaster scenario of debris flow caused by torrential rain. We set the hydrograph using rainfall intensity data, and set the landform data using information from the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI) and a digital elevation model (DEM). We evaluated different mesh sizes and also used a digital surface model (DSM) to consider the building heights. The simulation results showed that with small mesh size, the debris flow moved through the roads, which seems realistic for a disaster situation. When buildings were considered, the flow direction changed, and a 1-m flow depth, which was deeper than in other cases, appeared in the flow path. This may pose a dangerous situation for evacuations.


Debris flow Simulation GIS Hyper KANAKO system Torrential rain Kiyomizu-dera 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aron G, Kibler DF (1990) Pond sizing for rational formula hydrographs. Water Resources. Bulletin 26(2): 255–258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1990.tb01368.xGoogle Scholar
  2. Egashira S, Miyamoto K, Itoh T (1997) - Constitutive equations of debris flow and their applicability. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Debris Flow Hazards Mitigation, ASCE, held in San Francisco, California, United States, 7-9 August, 1997, pp 340–349. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.4623.7122Google Scholar
  3. Fukawa G, Katsuki S, Ishikawa N, et al. (2002) Simulation and stochastic evaluation of the open type steel check dam for damming up performance. In: Proceedings of INTERPRAEVENT 2002 in the Pacific Rim, held in Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan, 14-18 October, 2002. pp 751–760.Google Scholar
  4. Ishikawa N, Inoue R, Beppu M, et al. (2012) Dynamic response of specimen under debris flow surge model. In: Proceedings of 12th Congress INTERPRAEVENT 2012, held in Grenoble, France, 23-27 April, 2012. pp 761–770. Available online: tionen/Tagungsbeitraege/2012_2_761.pdf (Accessed on 1 March 2015)Google Scholar
  5. Ishikawa Y, Ikeda A, Kashiwabara Y, et al. (2014) Debris disasters caused by Typhoon Wipha (T 1326) in Izu Oshima on Oct.16, 2013. Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control. Engineering 66(5): pp 61–72. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Jiang CH, Chen NC, Hsu SC (2013) Modeling of debris flow using Distinct Element Method. In Proceedings of IACGE 2013, Challenges and Recent Advances in Geotechnical and Seismic Research and Practices, ASCE, held in Chengdu, China, 25-27 October, 2013. pp 713–720. DOI: 10.1061/9780784413128Google Scholar
  7. Kreibich H, Piroth K, Maiwald H, et al. (2009) Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modeling? Natural Hazard and Earth System. Sciences 9: 1679–1692. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009Google Scholar
  8. Kyoto Prefecture, Construction transportation department, Sabo section (2004) Sediment Disaster Prone Areas Map. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Kyoto Local Meteorological Office (2012) Heavy rainfall occurred on July 15, 2012 in Kyoto City and Kameoka City. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Loup B, Egli T, Stucki M, et al. (2012) Impact pressures of hillslope debris flows. In: Proceedings of 12th Congress INTERPRAEVENT 2012, held in Grenoble, France, 23-27 April, 2012. pp 225–236. Available online: http://www. ngsbeitraege/2012_1_225.pdf (Accessed on 5 March 2015)Google Scholar
  11. Lin JY, Yang MD, Lin BR, et al. (2011) Risk assessments of debris flows in Songhe Stream, Taiwan, Engineering Geology (123): 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakatani K, Wada T, Satofuka Y, et al. (2008) Development of “Kanako”, a wide use 1-D and 2-D debris flow simulator equipped with GUI, Monitoring, Simulation, Prevention, and Remediation of Dense and Debris Flow II, WIT PRESS. pp 49–60. DOI: 10.2495/DEB080061Google Scholar
  13. Nakatani K, Iwanami, Horiuchi, S, et al. (2012) Development of “Hyper KANAKO”, a debris flow simulation system based on Laser Profiler data. In: Proceedings of INTERPRAEVENT 2012, held in Grenoble, France, 23-27 April, 2012. pp 269–280. Available online: upload_files/Publikationen/Tagungsbeitraege/2012_1_ 269.pdf (Accessed on 1 March 2015)Google Scholar
  14. Nakatani K, Okuyama Y, Hasegawa Y, et al. (2013) Influence of housing and urban development on debris flow flooding and deposition. Journal of Mountain. Science 10(2): 273–280. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2507-xGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakatani K, Iwanami E, Horiuchi S, et al. (2014) Application of “Hyper KANAKO”, a debris flow simulation system using laser profiler data. In: Proceedings of INTERPRAEVENT 2014 held in Nara, Japan, 25-28 November, 2014, O-29. p 9.Google Scholar
  16. Nakatani K, Satofuka Y, Fujita M, et al. (2014) Study on Debris Flow Occurred in Nanjo, Kameoka City, Kyoto Prefecture on July 2012 Considering Houses Influence. Japan Society for Natural. Disaster: 33(1): 17–27. Available online: http://www. (Accessed on 1 February 2015) (In Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  17. National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan (2007), Manual of Technical Standard for establishing Sabo master plan for debris flow and driftwood, Technical Note of National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Report. No.364 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. O’Brien JS, Julien PY, Fullerton WT (1993): Two dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 119(2): 244–261. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Public Works Research Institute, Japan (2003) Research Report of calculation method of probability precipitation using AMEDAS observation site, Technical Note of Public Works Research Institute, No.3900 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Satofuka Y, Mizuyama T (2005). Numerical simulation of a debris flow in a mountainous river with a sabo dam. Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering 58(1): 14–19. (in Japanese with English abstract). Available online: _pdf (Accessed on 1 February 2015)Google Scholar
  21. Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Satofuka Y, et al. (2001) Flood and sediment disasters triggered by 1999 rainfall in Venezuela: A river restoration plan for an alluvial fan. Journal of Natural Disaster. Science 23: 65–82. Available online: http://www. (Accessed on 5 February 2015).Google Scholar
  22. Takahashi T (2007) Debris flow: Mechanics, Prediction and Countermeasures. Taylor & Francis, Leiden, CRC Press, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wada T, Satofuka, Y, Mizuyama T (2008) Integration of 1- and 2-dimensional models for debris flow simulation. Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control. Engineering 61(2): 36–40. (in Japanese with English abstract). Available online: (Accessed on 1 February 2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kana Nakatani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Satoshi Hayami
    • 2
  • Yoshifumi Satofuka
    • 3
  • Takahisa Mizuyama
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Erosion Control EngineeringKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.CTI Engineering Co.,Ltd.OsakaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringRitsumeikan UniversityShigaJapan
  4. 4.National Graduate Institute for Policy StudiesTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations