Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 1068–1083 | Cite as

Determination method for shear strength parameters of rock-soil mixtures using close-range photogrammetry and 3-D limit equilibrium theory

  • Jia-wen ZhouEmail author
  • Xing-guo Yang
  • Zhao-hui Yang
Article

Abstract

Using a combination of close-range photogrammetry and three-dimensional (3-D) limit equilibrium theory, a determination method for the shear strength parameters of rock-soil mixture is presented. A close-range photogrammetry method is used for measurement of the 3-D terrain of the experimental target. AutoCAD Lisp and EXCEL VBA are used to perform 3-D limit equilibrium analysis of the stability of sliding mass and perform backanalysis of shear strength parameters. The presented method was used to determine the shear strength parameters of rock-soil mixtures at the Liyuan Hydropower Station. The 3-D terrain of sliding surface could be measured notably well using of closerange photogrammetry. The computed results reveal that the cohesion and friction angle of rock-soil mixtures were 3.15 kPa and 29.88° for test A, respectively, and 4.43 kPa and 28.30° for test B, respectively, within the range of shear strength parameters, as determined by field and laboratory tests. The computation of shear strength parameters is influenced by the mesh grid number, especially the cohesion of the rock-soil mixture. The application of close-range photogrammetry can reduce the site works and improve the computational efficiency and accuracy.

Keywords

Rock-soil mixtures In-situ horizontal push-shear test Photogrammetry Limit equilibrium Shear strength parameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arias P, Herráez J, Lorenzo H, et al. (2005) Control of structural problems in cultural heritage monuments using close-range photogrammetry and computer methods. Computers and Structures 83: 1754–1766. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias P, Ordόñez C, Lorenzo H, et al. (2007) Low-cost documentation of traditional agro-industrial buildings by close-range photogrammetry. Building and Environment 42: 1817–1827. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldi P, Fabris M, Marsella M, et al. (2005) Monitoring the morphological evolution of the Sciara del Fuoco during the 2002-2003 Stromboli eruption using multi-temporal photogrammetry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 59: 199–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldi P, Cenni N, Fabris M, et al. (2008) Kinematics of a landslide derived from archival photogrammetry and GPS data. Geomorphology 102: 435–444. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang K, Cheng M (2014) Estimation of the shear strength of gravel deposits based on field investigated geological factors. Engineering Geology 171: 70–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coli N, Berry P, Boldini D (2011) In situ non-conventional shear tests for the mechanical characterisation of a bimrock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science 48: 95–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du X, Jin X, Zhang X, et al. (2009) Geometry features measurement of traffic accident for reconstruction based on close-range photogrammetry. Advances in Engineering Software 40: 497–505. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallousi C, Koukouvelas IK (2007) Quantifying geomorphic evolution of earthquake-triggered landslides and their relation to active normal faults. An example from the Gulf of Corinth, Greece. Tectonophysics 440: 85–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2007.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garg A, Garg A, Tai K, et al. (2014a) A computational intelligence-based genetic programming approach for the simulation of soil water retention curves. Transport in Porous Media 103: 497–513. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-014-0313-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garg A, Vijayaraghavan GA, Wong CH, et al. (2014b) Combined CI-MD approach in formulation of engineering moduli of single layer graphene sheet. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 48: 93–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2014.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garg A, Tai K (2014) Stepwise approach for the evolution of generalized genetic programming model in prediction of surface finish of the turning process. Advances in Engineering Software 78: 16–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haneberg WC (2008) Using close range terrestrial digital photogrammetry for 3-D rock slope modeling and discontinuity mapping in the United States. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 67: 457–469. DOI: 10.1007/s10064-008-0157-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kääb A (2002) Monitoring high-mountain terrain deformation from repeated air-and spaceborne optical data: examples using digital aerial imagery and ASTER data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 57: 39–52. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00114-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsson L, Sjö dahl M, Thuvander F (2004) Microscopic 3-D displacement field measurements using digital speckle photography. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 41: 767–777. DOI: 10.1016/S0143-8166(03)00028-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang R, Jáuregui DV, White KR (2008) Close-range photogrammetry applications in bridge measurement: Literature review. Measurement 41: 823–834. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2007.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Noda A, TuZino T (2007) Characteristics of sediments and their dispersal systems along the shelf and slope of an active forearc margin, eastern Hokkaido, northern Japan. Sedimentary Geology 201: 341–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohnishi Y, Nishiyama S, Yano T, et al. (2006) A study of the application of digital photogrammetry to slope monitoring systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 43: 756–766. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pesci A, Fabris M, Conforti D, et al. (2007) Integration of ground-based laser scanner and aerial digital photogrammetry for topographic modelling of Vesuvio volcano. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 162: 123–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwab M, Rieke-Zapp D, Schneider H, et al. (2008) Landsliding and sediment flux in the Central Swiss Alps: A photogrammetric study of the Schimbrig landslide, Entlebuch. Geomorphology 97: 392–406. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007. 08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Selley RC (2000) Applied Rock-Soil Aggregateology, 2nd edition. Academic Press, Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Sturzenegger M, Stead D (2009) Close-range terrestrial digital photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for discontinuity characterization on rock cuts. Engineering Geology 106: 163–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vallejo LE, Mawby R (2000) Porosity influence on the shear strength of granular material-clay mixtures. Engineering Geology 58: 125–136. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00051-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang Y, Cuitiño AM (2002) Full-field measurements of heterogeneous deformation patterns on polymeric foams using digital image correlation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 39: 3777–3796. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00176-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview. Engineering Geology 102: 112–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu J, Tillett R, McFarlane N, et al. (2004) Extracting the threedimensional shape of live pigs using stereo photogrammetry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 44: 203–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu WJ, Hu RL, Tan RJ (2007) Some geomechanical properties of soil–rock mixtures in Hutiao Gorge Area, China. Geotechnique 57: 255–264. DOI: 10.1680/geot.2007.57.3.255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu WJ, Xu Q, Hu RL (2011) Study on the shear strength of soil–rock mixture by large scale direct shear test. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science 48: 1235–1247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. You XH, Tang JS (2002) Research on horizontal push-shear insitu test of soil and rock-mixture. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 21: 1537–1540. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Yilmaz HM, Yakar M, Yildiz F (2008) Documentation of historical caravansaries by digital close range photogrammetry. Automation in Construction 17: 489–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou J, Xu W, Yang X, et al. (2010) The 28 October 1996 landslide and analysis of the stability of the current Huashiban slope at the Liangjiaren Hydropower Station, Southwest China. Engineering Geology 114: 45–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou J, Shi C, Xu F (2013) Geotechnical characteristics and stability analysis of rock-soil aggregate slope at the Gushui Hydropower Station, Southwest China. The Scientific World Journal, Volume 2013, Article ID540636, 16 pages. DOI: 10.1155/2013/540636Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.College of Water Resource and HydropowerSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.School of EngineeringUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations