Skip to main content
Log in

Application and comparison of coaxial correlation diagram and hydrological model for reconstructing flood series under human disturbance

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intense human activities have greatly changed the flood generation conditions in most areas of the world, and have destroyed the consistency in the annual flood peak and volume series. For design flood estimation, coaxial correlation diagram and conceptual hydrological model are two frequently used tools to adjust and reconstruct the flood series under human disturbance. This study took a typical mountain catchment of the Haihe River Basin as an example to investigate the effects of human activities on flood regime and to compare and assess the two adjustment methods. The main purpose is to construct a conceptual hydrological model which can incorporate the effects of human activities. The results show that the coaxial correlation diagram is simple and widely-used, but can only adjust the time series of total flood volumes. Therefore, it is only applicable under certain conditions (e.g. There is a strong link between the flood peaks and volumes and the link is not significantly affected by human activities). The conceptual model is a powerful tool to adjust the time series of both flood peak flows and flood volumes over different durations provided that it is closely related to the catchment hydrological characteristics, specifically accounting for the effects of human activities, and incorporating expert knowledge when estimating or calibrating parameters. It is suggested that the two methods should be used together to cross check each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RM, Koren VI, Reed SM (2006) Using SSURGO data to improve Sacramento Model a priori parameter estimates. Journal of Hydrology 320(1–2): 103–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao ZX, Zhang JY, Wang GQ, et al. (2012) Attribution for decreasing streamflow of the Haihe River basin, northern China: Climate variability or human activities? Journal of Hydrology 460: 117–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beighley RE, Moglen GE (2003) Adjusting measured peak discharges from an urbanizing watershed to reflect a stationary land use signal. Water resources research 39(4) DOI: 10.1029/2002wr001846

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T (2008) On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Processes 22(5): 629–642. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Baldassarre G, Kooy M, Kemerink JS, et al. (2013) Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human-water systems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17(8): 3235–3244. DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-3235-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan QY, Sorooshian S, Gupta V (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water resources research 28(4): 1015–1031. DOI: 10.1029/91WR02985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan QY, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1994) Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology 158(3): 265–284. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenicia F, Kavetski D, Savenije HHG, et al. (2014) Catchment properties, function, and conceptual model representation: is there a correspondence?. Hydrological Processes 28(4): 2451–2467. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaal L, Szolgay J, Kohnova S, et al. (2015) Dependence between flood peaks and volumes: a case study on climate and hydrological controls. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques 60(6): 968–984. DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.951361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan TY (1998) Hydroclimatic trends and possible climatic warming in the Canadian Prairies. Water resources research 34(11): 3009–3015. DOI: 10.1029/98WR01265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan TY, Dlamini EM, Biftu GF (1997) Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 192(1): 81–103. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03114-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharari S, Hrachowitz M, Fenicia F, et al. (2014) Using expert knowledge to increase realism in environmental system models can dramatically reduce the need for calibration. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(12): 4839–4859. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-10-14801-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J, Arheimer B, Borga M, et al. (2014) Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(7): 2735–2772. DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-2735-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Xia DZ, Gan HX (2011) Study on Extraction and Application of Hydrological Characteristics. Water Resources Informatization 103(4): 4–8. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrachowitz M, Fovet O, Ruiz L, et al. (2014) Process consistency in models: The importance of system signatures, expert knowledge, and process complexity. Water resources research 50(9): 7445–7469. DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jothityangkoon C, Sivapalan M, Farmer DL (2001) Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development. Journal of Hydrology 254(1–4): 174–198. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00496-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latron J, Gallart F (2008) Runoff generation processes in a small Mediterranean research catchment (Vallcebre, Eastern Pyrenees). Journal of Hydrology 358(3–4): 206–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DL, Wang WS, Hu SX, et al. (2012) Characteristics of annual runoff variation in major rivers of China. Hydrological Processes 26(19): 2866–2877. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JZ, Feng P, Chen FL (2014) Effects of land use change on flood characteristics in mountainous area of Daqinghe watershed, China. Natural Hazards 70(1): 593–607. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0830-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Xia J, Xu C-Y, et al. (2009) Analyse the sources of equifinality in hydrological model using GLUE methodology. In: Hydroinformatics in Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Water Resources, Proceedings of Symposium JS. pp: 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CM, Yu JJ, Kendy E (2001) Groundwater exploitation and its impact on the environment in the North China Plain. Water International 26(2): 265–272. DOI: 10.1080/02508060108686913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre N, Al-Qurashi A (2009) Performance of ten rainfallrunoff models applied to an arid catchment in Oman. Environmental Modelling & Software 24(6): 726–738. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of PRC (2006) Regulation for calculating design flood of water resources and hydropower projects. China Water & Power Press, Beijing, P.R.China. p 7 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash J, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center of Hydrological Information (2000) Standard for hydrological information and hydrological forecasting. China WaterPower Press, Beijing, China. pp: 19 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff D, Fritsch U, Bronstert A (2002) Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology 267(1–2): 80–93. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00142-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrone KC, Hughes JD, Van Niel TG, et al. (2010) Streamflow decline in southwestern Australia, 1950-2008. Geophysical Research Letters 37: L11401. DOI: 10.1029/2010GL043102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, et al. (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52(10): 891–904. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savenije HHG, Hoekstra AY, van der Zaag P (2014) Evolving water science in the Anthropocene. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(1): 319–332. DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-319-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih SS, Yang SC, Ouyang HT (2014) Anthropogenic effects and climate change threats on the flood diversion of Erchung Floodway in Tanshui River, northern Taiwan. Natural Hazards 73(3): 1733–1747. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1166-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son K, Sivapalan M (2007) Improving model structure and reducing parameter uncertainty in conceptual water balance models through the use of auxiliary data. Water resources research 43(1): W01415. DOI: 10.1029/2006wr005032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WG, Shao QX, Yang T, et al. (2013) Quantitative assessment of the impact of climate variability and human activities on runoff changes: a case study in four catchments of the Haihe River basin, China. Hydrological Processes 27(8): 1158–1174. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YC, Yu PS, Yang TC (2010) Comparison of genetic algorithms and shuffled complex evolution approach for calibrating distributed rainfall-runoff model. Hydrological Processes 24(8): 1015–1026. DOI: 10.1002/Hyp.7543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong LH, Yu KX, Zhang HG, et al. (2013) Annual runoff change in the headstream of Yangtze River and its relation to precipitation and air temperature. Hydrology Research 44(5): 850–874. DOI: 10.2166/nh.2012.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu HL, Xu CY, Chen H, et al. (2013) Assessing the influence of rain gauge density and distribution on hydrological model performance in a humid region of China. Journal of Hydrology 505: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YH, Tian F (2009) Abrupt change of runoff and its major driving factors in Haihe River Catchment, China. Journal of Hydrology 374(3–4): 373–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao C, Zhang K, Yu ZB, et al. (2014) Improving the flood prediction capability of the Xinanjiang model in ungauged nested catchments by coupling it with the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology 517: 1035–1048. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan X, Lei T (2004) Soil and water conservation measures and their benefits in runoff and sediment reductions. Transactions of the CSAE 20(2): 296–300. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhou Y (2009) Analysis of soil and water conservation measures in the Qiuzhuang catchment. Hebei Water Resources 6: 29. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao RJ (1992) The Xinanjiang model applied in China. Journal of Hydrology 135(1): 371–381. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90096-E

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiao-ling Li.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8202-5361

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-9479

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-4988

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-9372

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-429X

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Pn., Li, Zj., Li, Ql. et al. Application and comparison of coaxial correlation diagram and hydrological model for reconstructing flood series under human disturbance. J. Mt. Sci. 13, 1245–1264 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3474-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3474-1

Keywords

Navigation