Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in grain size distribution in debris flow

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grain composition of debris flow varies considerably from fluid to deposit, making it uncertain to estimate flow properties (e.g., density, velocity and discharge) using deposit as done in practice. Tracing the variation of grain composition is thus more important than estimating some certain properties of flow because every debris flow event consists of a series of surges that are distinct in properties and flow regimes. We find that the materials of debris flows, both the fluid and the source soils, satisfy a universal grain size distribution (GSD) in a form of P (D) = CD - μexp( -D/D c), where the parameters C, μ and D c are determined by fitting the function to the grain size frequency. A small µ implies a small porosity and possible high excess pore pressure in flow; and a large D c means a wide range of grain composition and hence a high sediment concentration. Flow density increases as µ decreases or D c increases, in a power law form. A debris flow always achieves a state of certain mobility and density that can be well described by the coupling of µ and D c , which imposes a constraint on the fluctuations of flow surges. The GSD also describes the changes in grain composition in that it is always satisfied during the course of debris flow developing. Numerical simulation using the GSD can well illustrate the variation of µ and D c from source soils to deposits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen NS, Cui P, Liu ZG (2003) Calculation of the debris flow concentration based on clay content. Science in China E46. Supp. 163–174. DOI: 10.1360/03ez0005

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui P, Chen XQ, Wang YY, et al. (2005) Jiangjia Ravine debris flows in south-western China. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds.), Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Praxis Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany. pp 565–594.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Du RH, Kang ZC, Chen XQ (1987) Investigation and Prevention Plan of Debris Flows in the Xiaojiang River, Yunnan, China. Science and Technology Literature Press, Chongqing, China. pp 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, AG (2004) Percolation transport in fractal porous media. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 19: 309–325. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00044-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory. Journal of Geophysical Research 106(B1): 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Vallance JW (2001) New views of granular mass flows. Geology 29(2): 115–118. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613 (2001) 029<0115:NVOGMF>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, Iverson NR, et al. (2000) Acute sensitivity of landslide rates to initial soil porosity. Science 290: 513–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CG, Kokelaar BP, Iverson RM, et al. (2012) Grain-size segretation and levee formation in geophysical mass flows. Journal of Geophysical Research 117 DOI: 10.1029/2011JF002185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, AJ, Thompson AH (1985) Fractal sandstone pores: implications for conductivity and pore formation. Physical Review Letters 54(12): 1325–1328. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li PJ, Liang DL (1982) Calculation of debris flow density. Journal of Sediment Research 9(3): 75–83. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Yong, Zhou Xiaojun, Su Pengcheng, et al. (2013) A scaling distribution for grain composition of debris flow. Geomorphology 192: 30–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien JS, Julien PY (1988) Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 114: 877–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson TC (1980) Erosion and deposition by debris flows at Mt. Thomas, North Canterbury, New Zealand. Earth Surface processes and Landforms 5(3): 227–247. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3760050302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson TC (1981) Dominant particle support mechanisms in debris flows at Mt. Thomas, New Zealand, and implications for flow mobility. Sedimentology 28: 49–60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1981.tb01662.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieu M, Sposito G (1991) Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity, and water properties I. Theory. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55(5): 1231–1238. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500050006x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1981) Debris flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 13: 57–77. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.13.010181.000421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Bin (2008) Research on the calculating density by the deposit of debris flows. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica 26(5): 789–796. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XJ, Cui P, Jia ST, et al. (2012) Flume text on the movement of fine grains based on orthogonal design. Journal of Sichuan University 44(1): 83–103. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Li.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-3131

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8049-0534

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8693-9048

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0590-9550

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Wang, Bl., Zhou, Xj. et al. Variation in grain size distribution in debris flow. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 682–688 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3351-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3351-3

Keywords

Navigation