Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 137–145 | Cite as

Geomorphologic analysis and physico-dynamic characteristics of Zhatai-Gully debris flows in SW China

  • Xi-lin LiuEmail author
  • Chuan Tang
  • Hua-yong Ni
  • Yuan Zhao


Zhatai gully is a typical debris flow channel in Butuo county of Sichuan province, southwestern China. The geomorphologic features are analyzed and the physical-dynamic characteristics are discussed on the basis of field investigation and laboratory tests. Geomorphologic analysis indicates that Zhatai-gully drainage in relation to debris flow can be divided into source area, transport area, and deposition area. The source area has a steep slope and has very limited vegetation cover, which favors runoff, allowing loose solid materials to be mobilized easily and rapidly. In the transport area, there are many small landslides, lateral lobes, and loose materials distributed on both banks. These landslides are active and constantly providing abundant source of soils for the debris flows. In the deposition area, three old debris-flow deposits of different ages can be observed. The dynamic calculation shows that within the recurrence intervals of 50 and 100 years, debris flow discharges are 155.77m3/s and 1y8.19m3/s and deposition volumes are 16.39 x 104 m3 and 18.14 x 104 m3, respectively. The depositional fan of an old debris flow in the outlet of the gully can be subdivided into six layers. There are three debris flow deposits on left and two on the right side of the gully. Grain-size tests of sediments from the soil, gulley bed deposits, and the fresh and old debris flow deposits showed that high amounts of clay and fine gravel were derived from the soil in the source area whereas much of the gravel fraction were sourced from the gully bed deposits. Comprehensive analysis indicates that Zhatai gully is viscous debris-flow gully with moderate to high frequency and moderate to large magnitude debris flows. The risk of a debris flow disaster in Zhatai-gully is moderate and poses a potential threat to the planned hydroelectric dam. Appropriate engineering measures are suggested in the construction and protection of the planned hydroelectric station.


Debris flows Geomorphologic feature Zhatai gully China 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander D (1989) Urban landslides. Progress in Physical Geography 13: 157–191. DOI: 10.1177/030913338901300201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berti M, Genevois R, Simoni A, et al. (1999) Field observations of a debris flow event in the Dolomites. Geomorphology 29: 265–274. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00018-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunsden D (1979) Mass movements. In: Embleton C, Thornes J (eds.), Process in Geomorphology. Edward Arnolds, London, UK. pp 130–186.Google Scholar
  4. Cannon SH, Reneau SL (2000) Conditions for generation of firerelated debris flows, Capulin Canyon, New Mexico. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25: 1103–1121. DOI: 10.1002/1096-9837(200009)25:10<1103::AIDESP120>3.0.C O;2-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen NS, Yue ZQ, Cui P, et al. (2007) A rational method for estimating maximum discharge of a landslide-induced debris flow: a case study from southwestern China. Geomorphology 84: 44–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coe JA, Glancy PA, Whitney JW (1997) Volumetric analysis and hydrologic characterization of a modern debris flow near Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Geomorphology 20: 11–28. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00008-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decaulne A, Saemundsson T (2006) Geomorphic evidence for present-day snow-avalanche and debris-flow impact in the Icelandic Westfjords. Geomorphology 80: 80–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Editorial Committee of Butuo County Annals of Sichuan Province (ECBCASP) (1993) Butuo County Annals. China Architecture Industry Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Gabet EJ, Bookter A (2008) A morphometric analysis of gullies scoured by post-fire progressively bulked debris flows in southwest Montana, USA. Geomorphology 96: 298–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glade T (2005) Linking debris-flow hazard assessments with geomorphology. Geomorphology 66: 189–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hongey C, Dadson S, Chi YG (2006) Recent rainfall-induced landslides and debris flow in northern Taiwan. Geomorphology 77: 112–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006. 01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Innes J (1983) Debris flows. Progress in Physical Geography 7: 469–501. DOI: 10.1177/030913338300700401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMHE, CAS) (1989) Research and prevention on debris flow. Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Reviews of Geophysics 35: 245–296. DOI: 10.1029/97RG00426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson AM, Rodine JR (1984) Debris Flow. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (eds.), Slope Instability. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. pp 257–361.Google Scholar
  16. Malet JP, Laigle D, Remaître A, et al. (2005) Triggering conditions and mobility of debris flows associated to complex earthflows. Geomorphology 66: 215–235. DOI: 10.1016/j. geomorph.2004.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neary DG, Klopatek CC, Debano LF, et al. (1999) Fire effects on below ground sustainability: a review and synthesis. Forest Ecology and Management 122: 51–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00032-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ni HY, Zheng WM, Liu XL, et al. (2011) Fractal-statistical analysis on grain-size distribution of debris-flow deposits and its geological implications. Landslides 8: 253–259. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-010-0240-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sichuan Department of Water Conservation (SDWC) (1984) manual of small drainage floods in Sichuan Province. Chengdu, Sichuan Department of Water Conservation. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Wilson AJ, Petley DN, Murphy W (2003) Down-slope variation in geotechnical parameters and pore fluid control on a largescale Alpine landslide. Geomorphology 54: 49–62. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00055-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou BF, Li DJ, Luo DF, et al. (1991) Guidline for debris flow countermeasures. Science Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xi-lin Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chuan Tang
    • 2
  • Hua-yong Ni
    • 3
  • Yuan Zhao
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Geography and PlanningSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengduChina
  3. 3.Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral ResourcesChina Geological SurveyChengduChina
  4. 4.Natural Resoources Science Academy of Sichuan ProvinceChengduChina

Personalised recommendations