Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological species groups and interspecific association of dominant tree species in Daiyun Mountain National Nature Reserve

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the ecological species groups and interspecific association of plant species are helpful to discover species coexistence processes and mechanisms, and to more fully understand plant community structure, function, and its taxonomy. However, little is known about the ecological species groups (ESG) and the interspecific association of dominant species in Daiyun Mountain National Nature Reserve of Fujian Province, China. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to explore the ESG using maximal tree, and to analyze interspecific associations of 32 dominant species selected from 102 sample plots using the chi-square test. The results show that: (1) 32 dominant species have a significant overall positive interspecific association, which indicates that the natural forest in Daiyun Mountain National Nature Reserve is stable, (2) The species pairs with weak associations, non-associations and positive associations account for 10.88%, 29.64% and 59.48% of the total 496 species pairs respectively, which suggests that the population distributions of the dominant species investigated are relatively independent, (3) The following species pairs may be useful for practical application, 〈Pinus taiwanensis, Rhododendron farrerae〉, 〈Castanopsis carlesii, Altingia chinensis〉, 〈C. carlesii, Castanopsis fargesii〉, 〈Castanopsis eyrei, C. fargesii〉, 〈P. taiwanensis, Fagus lucida〉, 〈Machilus thunbergii, Castanopsis nigrescens〉, and (4) The results of clustering analysis based on the maximal tree method indicates that the 32 dominant species can be divided into 3 ESGs when λ at 0.60, that is ESG I {Pinus massoniana, Cunning hamia lanceolata}, ESG II {P. taiwanensis, R. farrerae, Enkianthus quinqueflorus}, ESG III {C. carlesii, A. chinensis, C. eyrei, Castanopsis fabri, C. fargesii, Schima superba, Machilus thunbergii, Rhododendron latoucheae}. The results may be used for the selection of afforestation tree species in South China Forest Areas and guide the natural management of plantations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abella SR, Covington WW (2006) Vegetation environment relationships and ecological species groups of an Arizona Pinus ponderosa landscape, USA. Plant Ecology 185: 255–268. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-006-9102-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abella SR, Shelburne VB (2004) Ecological species groups of South Carolina’s Jocassee Gorges, southern Appalachian Mountains. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 131(3): 220–231. DOI: 10.2307/4126952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron Y, Bouchard A (1983) Use of ecological groups in analysis and classification of plant communities in a section of western Quebec. Vegetatio 56(1): 45–63. DOI: 10.1007/BF00036136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XJ, Hu XD, Shuai TP (2006) Inapproximability and approximability of maximal tree routing and coloring. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 11: 219–229. DOI: 10.1007/s10878-006-7135-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidudu B, Copeland RS, Wanda F, et al. (2011) Distribution, interspecific associations and abundance of aquatic plants in Lake Bisina, Uganda. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 49: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ, Mustapha EH (2006) Interspecific associations in habitat use between marbled teal and other waterbirds wintering at Sidi Bou Ghaba, Morocco. Ardeola 53(1): 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong W, Chen MX (1990) Calculation and application of interspecific associations of broad-leaved trees in the North Fujian. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 26(2): 175–181. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalilvand H, Kooch Y, Bahamnyar MA, et al. (2007) Ecological species groups of hornbeam forest ecosystems in Southern Caspian (North of Iran). Journal of Biological Sciences 7: 1504–1510. DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2007.1504.1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jian MF, Liu QJ, Zhu D, et al. (2009), Interspecific correlations among dominant populations of tree layer species in evergreen broad-leaved forest in Jiulianshan Mountain of subtropical China, Chinese. Journal of Plant Ecology 33(4): 672–680. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashian DM, Barnes BV, Walker WS (2003) Ecological species groups of landform-level ecosystems dominated by jack pine in northern Lower Michigan, USA. Plant Ecology 166: 75–91. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1023265012964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunwar RM, Mahat L, Sharma LN, et al. (2012) Underutilized plant species in far west Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science 9(5): 589–600. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-012-2315-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan GY, Getzin S, Wiegand T, et al. (2012) Spatial distribution and interspecific associations of tree species in a tropical seasonal rain forest of China. PLOS ONE 7(9): 1–9. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YD, Xu H, Chen DX, et al. (2008) Division of ecological species groups and functional groups based on interspecific association — a case study of the tree layer in the tropical lowland rainforest of Jianfenling in Hainan Island, China. Frontiers of Forestry in China 3(4): 407–415. DOI: 10.1007/s11461-008-0049-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SX, Chen Y, Gao HD, et al. (2010) Potential chromosomal introgression barriers revealed by linkage analysis in a hybrid of Pinus massoniana and P. hwangshanensis. BMC Plant Biology 10: 37. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SZ, Cao GQ, Yu XT, et al. (2001) A selection of suitable multi-purpose associated tree species for Chinese fir. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 37(special issue): 24–29. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JF, Huang ZS, Fu DL, et al. (2010) Study on compositions and geographical elements of vascular plants in castanopsis fabri community, Daiyun Mountain. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 28(1): 27–33. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer HA (2006) Interspecific association and substrate specificity in Tardigrades from Florida, Southeastern United States. Hydrobiologia 558: 129–132. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1411-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao S, Fang JY, Ciais P, et al. (2009) The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458: 1009–1012. DOI: 10.1038/nature07944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piche J, Iverson SJ, Parrish FA (2010) Characterization of forage fish and invertebrates in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands using fatty acid signatures: species and ecological groups. Marine Ecology progress series 418: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad JE, Shafiei AB (2010) The distribution of ecological species groups in fagetum communities of Caspian forest: Determination of effective environmental factors. Flora 205(11): 721–727. DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter DA. 1984. Variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications. Ecology 65(3): 998–1005. DOI: 10.2307/1938071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Barnes BV (1985) Ecological species groups of upland northern hardwood-hemlock forest ecosystems of the Sylvania Recreation Area, Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15: 961–972. DOI: 10.1139/x85-153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XG, Wiegand T, Hao Z, et al. (2010) Species associations in an old-growth temperate forest in north-eastern China. Journal of Ecology 98: 674–686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01644.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang FY, Wang YC (1987) Methematical classification of ecological species groups in virgin forests on south slope of Xiaoxing’anling mountains. Journal of northeast forestry university 15(6): 1–7. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. taxon 21(2/3): 213–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte JPM (2002) The descriptive capacity of ecological plant species groups. Plant Ecology 162: 199–213 DOI: 10.1023/A:1020370629402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand T, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N (2007) Species associations in a heterogeneous Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest. American Naturalist 170: 77–95. DOI: 10.1086/521240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZH, Hu G, Zhu JD, et al. (2010) Spatial patterns and interspecific associations of dominant tree species in two oldgrowth karst forests, SW China. Ecological Research 25: 1151–1160 DOI: 10.1007/s11284-010-0740-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng SQ, Liu JF, Huang ZS, et al. (2012) Nutrition ecological niche of dominant arbor species in Castanopsis fabri forest in Daiyun Mountain. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 20(2): 177–183. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DH, Liu JF, Hong W, et al. (2012) Studies on regeneration niche of main species in Pinus taiwanensis community in Daiyun Mountain. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 20(6): 561–565. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-fu Liu.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-5735

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-0845

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-041x

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-2997

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-3095

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-4018

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Sj., Liu, Jf., He, Zs. et al. Ecological species groups and interspecific association of dominant tree species in Daiyun Mountain National Nature Reserve. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 637–646 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2935-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2935-7

Keywords

Navigation