Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 522–531 | Cite as

GIS-based numerical modelling of debris flow motion across three-dimensional terrain

  • Jian Wu
  • Guang-qi Chen
  • Lu Zheng
  • Ying-bin ZhangEmail author
Open Access
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study is to incorporate a numerical model with GIS to simulate the movement, erosion and deposition of debris flow across the three dimensional complex terrain. In light of the importance of erosion and deposition processes during debris flow movement, no entrainment assumption is unreasonable. The numerical model considering these processes is used for simulating debris flow. Raster grid networks of a digital elevation model in GIS provide a uniform grid system to describe complex topography. As the raster grid can be used as the finite difference mesh, the numerical model is solved numerically using the Leap-frog finite difference method. Finally, the simulation results can be displayed by GIS easily and used to debris flow evaluation. To illustrate this approach, the proposed methodology is applied to the Yohutagawa debris flow that occurred on 20th October 2010, in Amami-Oshima area, Japan. The simulation results that reproduced the movement, erosion and deposition are in good agreement with the field investigation. The effectiveness of the dam in this real-case is also verified by this approach. Comparison with the results were simulated by other models, shows that the present coupled model is more rational and effective.

Key words

Debris flow Numerical simulation GIS Movement Erosion Deposition Equilibrium concentration 

References

  1. Armanini A, Fraccarollo L, Rosatti G (2009) Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows in erodible channels. Computers & Geosciences 35: 993–1006. Doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blahut J, Horton P, Sterlacchini P, Jaboyedoff M (2011) Debris flow hazard modelling on medium scale: Valtellina di Tirano, Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10: 2379–2390. Doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-2379-2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brufau P, García-Navarro P, Ghilardi P, et al. (2000) 1D mathematical modelling of debris flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research 38(6): 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng KY, Lin LK, Chang SY (1997) The field investigation and GIS application in a potential hazardous area of debris flow. Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings of the First International Conference, ASCE, New York. pp 83–92.Google Scholar
  5. Coussot P (1994). Some considerations on debris flow rheology. In: P. Ergenzinger and K.H. Schmidt (eds.), Dynamics and Geomorphology of Mountain Rivers, Berlin German. pp 315–326. Doi.org/10.1007/BFb0117848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sidle RC, Chigira M (2004) Landslides and debris flows strike Kyushu, Japan. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 85: 145–156. Doi.org/10.1029/2004EO150001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraccarollo L, Papa M (2000) Numerical simulation of real debris-flow events. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 25: 757–763. Doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00098-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hungr O (1995) A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 32: 610–623. Doi.org/10.1139/t95-063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hungr O, Evans SG (1997) A dynamic model for landslides with changing mass. In: Marinos, Koukis, Tsiambaos & Stournaras (eds.), Engineering geology and the environment, Athens, Greece. pp 719–724.Google Scholar
  10. Kappes MS, Malet JP, Remaitre A, et al. (2011) Assessment of debris-flow susceptibility at medium-scale in the Barcelonnette Basin, France. Nature Hazards Earth System Science 11: 627–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin J, Yang MD, Lin PS (1998) An evaluation on the applications of remote sensing and GIS in the estimation system on potential debris flow. Annual Conference of Chinese Geographic Information Society (CD edition).Google Scholar
  12. Lin ML, Jeng SS (1995) A preliminary study of risk assessment of debris flow using GIS. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering 7: 475–486. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Lin PS, Lin JY, Hung JC, Yang MD (2000) Risk assessment of potential debris flows using GIS. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Debris-Flow. Taipei, Taiwan. pp 431–440.Google Scholar
  14. Lai C (1991) Modelling alluvial channel flow by multimode characteristic method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 117: 32–53. Doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(32).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore ID, Grayson RB (1991) Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resources Researches 27: 1177–1191. Doi.org/10.1029/91WR00090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris PH, Williams DJ (1996) Relative celerities of mobile bed flows with finite solid concentration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 122: 311–315. Doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:6(311).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakagawa H, Takahashi T (1997) Estimation of a debris flow hydrograph and hazard area. In: Chen CL (eds.), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings of first International DFHM Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA. pp 64–73.Google Scholar
  18. Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Satofuka Y (2000) A debris-flow disaster on the fan of the Harihara River, Japan. In: Wieczorek GF and Naeser ND (eds.), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings of second International DFHM Conference. Taipei, Taiwan. pp 193–201.Google Scholar
  19. Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Satofuka Y, Kawaike K (2003) Numerical simulation of sediment disasters caused by heavy rainfall in Camuri Grande basin, Venezuela 1999, Proceedings of the third Conference on Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. pp 671–682.Google Scholar
  20. Naef D, Rickenmann D, Rutschmann P, McArdell BW (1999) Comparison of friction relations for debris flows using a one dimensional finite element simulation model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quan Luna B, Remaitre A, van Asch TWJ, et al. (2012) Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run — out model incorporating entrainment. In: Engineering geology, 128: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quan Luna B, Blahut J, van Westen CJ (2011) The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves. Natural hazards and earth system sciences 11: 2047–2060. Doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2047-2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rickenmann D, Koch T (1997) Comparison of debris flow modelling approaches. In: Chen CL (eds.), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings of first International DFHM Conference. ASCE, New York, USA. pp 576–585.Google Scholar
  24. Shieh CL, Jan CD, Tsai YF (1996) A numerical simulation of debris flow and its applications. Natural Hazards 13: 39–54. Doi.org/10.1007/BF00156505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang C, Renger N, Yang YH, Wang GF (2011) Triggering conditions and depositional characteristics of a disastrous debris flow event in Zhouqu city, Gansu Province, northwestern China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11: 2903–2912. Doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2903-2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takahashi T (1982) Study on deposition of debris flows (3): Erosion of debris fan. Disaster Prevention Research Institute annuals 25(B-2): 327–348. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Nishizaki T (1986) Two dimensional numerical simulation method to estimate the risk of a flood hazard caused by a river bank breach. Disaster Prevention Research Institute annuals 29(B-2): 431–450. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Yamaji A (1987) Method for determination of the hazardous area due to a debris flow. Disaster Prevention Research Institute annuals 30(B-2): 611–626. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. Takahashi T (1991). Debris Flow, IAHR Monograph Series, A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam. Doi.org/10.1201/9780203946282.Google Scholar
  30. Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Harada T, Yamashiki Y (1992) Routing debris flows with particle segregation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 118: 1490–1507. Doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:11(1490).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Takahashi T (2007). Debris Flow: Mechanics, Prediction and Countermeasures. Balkema-proceedings and monographs in engineering, water and earth sciences. pp 448.Google Scholar
  32. Wang C, Li S, Esaki T (2008) GIS-based two-dimensional numerical simulation of rainfall-induced debris flow. Natural hazards and earth system sciences 8: 47–58. Doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-47-2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whipple KX (1997) Open channel flow of Bingham Fluids: applications on debris flow research. The Journal of Geology 105: 243–262. Doi.org/10.1086/515916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoshiaki I and Akihide T (1978) Numerical simulations of flows and dispersive behaviours in southern part of lake Biwa. Disaster Prevention Research Institute Annuals 31 (B-2):293–305. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. Zanre DDL, Needham DJ (1996) On simple waves and weak shock theory for the equations of alluvial river hydraulics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 354: 2993–3054. Doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1996.0137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jian Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guang-qi Chen
    • 1
  • Lu Zheng
    • 1
  • Ying-bin Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Structure Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Geo-disaster Prevention LaboratoryFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations